Human Sacrifice
#1
Posted 19 May 2006 - 12:24 PM
In addition, when a king died, many under him had to follow him to the netherworld (a practice that continued long well after the Shang).
Recently however I found out from Discovery Channel that the Shang also another equally barbaric practice:
They found not a small number of cooking vessels in their excavations where human skulls are found. What these skulls were different from other skulls or skeletons found outside was that all of these skulls showed very strong evidences of being cooked!!Yes, being cooked, not really surprising, considering they were found inside cooking vessels. The real question is, they were cooked for what purpose?
It is still speculative at best but one possibility proposed is that the head was there to be eaten... in other words, cannabalism could have been practiced in Shang times or perhaps even earlier.
What do you guys think of it?
#2
Posted 19 May 2006 - 01:31 PM
Assuming that it is cannibalism here then I think it must be more symbolic than nourishing, otherwise other parts of the body would have been cooked instead?
#3
Posted 19 May 2006 - 09:38 PM
However there isn't much flesh on a head. Unless like Chinese today, those extremities are considered delicacies. Were the top of the skulls removed? The brain might be the main course.
Assuming that it is cannibalism here then I think it must be more symbolic than nourishing, otherwise other parts of the body would have been cooked instead?
hey, this almost exactly what the archeaologists speculated! Did you watch the show also? They actually thought this was some form of ritual cannabalism, not general, to celebrate killing some important enemies. Devouring the flesh of the enemies head, seemed to be a form of respect for the fallen enemy, while at the same time tranferring the prowess of the enemy to themselves. Respect? Well, I won't want to end up in a cooking vessel in order to get respected...
#4
Posted 19 May 2006 - 10:53 PM
In any case Cannibalism as practice is more common in many ancient cultures than we like to think.
#5
Posted 20 May 2006 - 02:31 AM
No, Ididnt watch the show, firstly I don't have Cable, 2ndly I no longer watch TV ever since I found CHF...
![]()
In any case Cannibalism as practice is more common in many ancient cultures than we like to think.
waah , GZ paid you to do advertisement for CHF izzit? like dat also can..
#6
Posted 29 May 2006 - 02:20 PM
Isolated cases still happen fairly regularly in even the most developed nations.
The journalist Zheng Yi wrote about mass cannibalism during the Cultural Revolution http://www.bordersst...1&srchType=ISBN
#7
Posted 29 May 2006 - 07:49 PM
Being associated with other cooking vessels does not mean the flesh is being eaten. The distinction needs to be made that food and wine figured largely into Shang ritual. The skulls may have been defleshed or used as vessels but there is no reason to assume true cannibalism even in the context of the find, since boiling a skull is a way people defesh bone even today.
Cannibilism is not so hard to prove, if longbones show cut marks from defleshing, or cracked bones to remove the marrow etc. If the skulls were cooked with the intention of eating the brains then some evidence should show if they were extracted for use as wine vessels or for wine consumption.
A documentary is too sparse to make a conclusion from, but if the evidence isnt clear and the skulls are known to be used for other purposes then it doesnt mean the Shang are actually eating flesh.
Given the focus on the skull then ritual seems more likely.
The type of vessels used would make the ritual purpose more clear....since some are not used for mundane purposes at all.
#8
Posted 29 May 2006 - 09:41 PM
#9
Posted 29 May 2006 - 10:11 PM
If the skull was still intact you could suck the fluid from the foramen magnum (the hole where the spine attaches) without spilling it on your neighbour during a toast.
Bob's your uncle & ''bottoms up''.
#10
Posted 29 May 2006 - 10:29 PM
#11
Posted 01 June 2006 - 04:51 AM
I agree with all that.. if full-fledged cannibalism was practiced, other parts should have been used other than the head..
but the fact that there were evidences that the head was cooked (as explained in the show) still makes me very uncomfortable..
#12
Posted 04 June 2006 - 02:43 AM
Hi guys, thanks for all the insights.. ( I myself have gain lots more already)
I agree with all that.. if full-fledged cannibalism was practiced, other parts should have been used other than the head..
but the fact that there were evidences that the head was cooked (as explained in the show) still makes me very uncomfortable..
ultimately we are all walking bags of meat.
in some cannibalistic societies, man was known as 'long pig' and considered to be a delicacy second only to pork (and superior to game, fish and fowl).
loads of chinese have eaten monkey. Man is only a couple chromosones' worth of difference.
I've always thought Shu Qi was the most delectable thing in the world.
yum, yum.
#13
Posted 17 February 2007 - 12:48 AM
It ain't over till it's over - Rocky Balboa
Knowledge without wisdom is useless, wisdom without knowledge is also useless; only with both wisdom and knowlge comes power
#14
Posted 17 February 2007 - 05:57 AM
Brings a whole new meaning to the word "munchkin", eh? Get it ... "munch kin"?
(sigh)
(whacks self on head)
"We Vandals get blamed for stuff that was actually done by some errant Lombard or Visigoth"
"Nationalism is much about forgetting as it is about remembering"
China historical vacation 2011 photos and videos: http://www.chinahist...na-trip-photos/
#15
Posted 17 February 2007 - 11:24 PM
maybe this people were cooked in pots as part of torture purposes?
A good possibility if bones were found inside the cooking vessels, but you'll have to ask lifelizard if that's true.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












