Massacre and Slaughter of the Overseas Chinese
#31
Posted 03 December 2004 - 02:37 AM
Malaysia - 8 million
Singapore - 3.5 million
Thailand - 6 million (I think)
Philippine - not clear because many chinese have become so integrated as mestizos that they themselves no longer consider themselves chinese.
Most overseas chinese, despite the hype about how rich they are, are actually quite poor. The gap between rich and poor amongst the chinese themselves is very large. The richest person in SEA is a Chinese, but we also have some of the poorest families in SEA.
It will be difficult to change things. As minorities (even sizeable minorities) in the various countries, they will always be subject to the whims and fancies of the majority.
Using the European descendants in the US & Australia as examples, they only achieved favourable conditions for their own people when they out-numbered the local population. They were lucky because they had only small local populations to deal with (and when this wasn't the case, the gun helped make it so, like in Tasmania). This is unlike SEA where the Chinese entered already well populated lands and not wide empty spaces. SEA was already seats of small local kingdoms and the chinese settled as traders. So for the last 1000 years, we are still trying to find an accomodation with the local populace, some more successfully than others. This millenium year old question will not be easy to solve.
Jieming
ISBN 981-05-5380-3
ACRS Singapore
#32
Guest_ignorant_fool_*
Posted 03 December 2004 - 02:49 AM
From the articles and things I read/heard, squabbles/fights about money by indonesian chinese does give me the impression of disunity. Nonetheless, this is just my opinion and exposure (experience/contacts). So this might not be correct, though i think some validity in my opinion.I respectfully disagree.
I am between disagree and agree. Disagree because I think massive PR would help. i.e. positive PR vs negative propaganda. Agree because the low level of education of the population hinders such a "race-impartiality" concept through the bad press/propaganda.In my opinion, the position of the ethnic-Chinese Indonesian citizens will never be a tenable one, at least for two more generations, regardless of what is done today.
One of the major root of the issue is the low level of education of the indonesian population. The past/present government admit this but real work/effort (not empty talk) has yet to be seen.But the reality is that the real source of the threat of violence come not from the poor people, but from unscrupulous masterminds working behind the scenes making use of the poor people for their own political gains.
"I mentioned earlier in this thread that many, if not a significant majority, of the Indonesian "natives" (i.e., excluding Chinese), would find it an affront to have significant ethnic Chinese presence in politics."
While the affront exist, the reasons behind it are multiple. Some reasons are reasonable, some political, some baseless, some racism, some propagandised, etc.
"One cannot judge by how native Indonesians and ethnic Chinese Indonesians might interact with each other overseas. The former is a miniscule percentage of the native Indonesians, and can be considered as a "priviliged group" even if you see them slaving away illegally in restaurants."
I dun know if "you" is a general "you" or referring to me. Some of native Indonesians and ethnic Chinese Indonesians i met before are consultants, but i do not think they are accurate depictions of typical indonesians.
"Many ethnic Chinese are actually struggling for a livelihood, but compared to the poorest Indonesians who live literally among human filth, the ethnic Chinese will never be seen as "one of us" by the natives."
This is due to the media reports of rich chinese and perceptions(to some extent correct) from chinese controlling majority economy. While I would think by comparison with native indonesians, the percentage of well-off chinese is more than the natives (I have not yet encounter any statistics on this.), the lower rungs of chinese are not better off than the natives. When it comes to the crunch, poor chinese eat tree barks and leaves too unless their more well-off relatives help. Like in a population graph, there are two ends of extreme, the difference is the alignment of the bell curve. Definitely not 20 millions out of 20 millions chinese are smart and rich.
"Until the issue of deep-rooted widespread urban poverty can be addressed, the ethnic Chinese will always be the target of frustrations and suspicions."
This issue of poor governance should majorly lies squarely on the government. Corruption and inefficiencies of the government is known by whole indonesia (but as mentioned blaming chinese is a good outlet). Problems like laws are common. e.g Past laws on a particular issue are not removed, while new laws on the same issue are passed. Even the government officials are confused to use which law to use because of multiple/different laws pertaining an issue. How does good governance would come about when laws/policies are not clear and are often changed irresponsibly?
"But the reality is that the real source of the threat of violence come not from the poor people, but from unscrupulous masterminds working behind the scenes making use of the poor people for their own political gains."
While masterminds made use of poor people, it still depends on the individual poor people "willingness" to harm/burn/loot.
#33
Posted 03 December 2004 - 03:13 AM
Which is why we're the way we are. The Qing government gave serious thought but no action. Same thing with the Ming government. They also gave serious thought about retaking Melaka from the Portuguese but again, no action. If they had acted, even with a minor show of strength we would be in a much better position today and many of the later day massacres probably not occur. It was partly this apathy from the Chinese government that left the overseas chinese in the cold. We were "criminals" & "pirates" in their eyes anyway. ;-)"The Qing did give serious thought to taking punitive measures in 1740. This should caution us against too sweeping a claim that China was a 'world empire' that could see nothing to be gained from involvements with economies beyond its own borders. Indeed, one of the major arguments in favour of a trade embargo to punish the Dutch for the massacre was that if not properly chastened, the Dutch might mistreat the next group of Chinese who came to trade, just as they had mistreated their long-term Chinese residents. The major argument against a ban was the deleterious effect it would have on the lives of hundreds of thousands of people on the south China coast. The crucial distinction was that those who remained based in China were entitled to imperial protection when they traded with and traveled to southeast Asia; but those who settled elsewhere were not." (Kenneth Pomeranz, "The Great Divergence" p. 203 - bold face added by me)
The funny thing is, right after the 2nd WW, the CCP government did position itself as the protector of the huaqiao for the first time in chinese history (but for political reasons, to spread communist revolution). This had the exact opposite effect and further alienated the overseas chinese from the local populace because suddenly every chinese was suspected of being communist. So I guess, when the overseas chinese would have best benefited from a show of strength from China, they didn't get it, but when it would not help the overseas chinese, they got it. hehehehe
Anyway, thankfully they dropped that idea fairly quickly or many of us would be languishing in jails, labelled as left-wing revolutionary elements.
Now that China is finally "respectable" in the world's eyes, would another round of "championing" huaqiao rights work for, or against their interests? I really don't know. The overseas chinese have learnt to stand on their own in many places in the world today. Maybe what is needed is not a strong champion China, but rather a strong chinese network similar to the Anglo-network of UK, US, Aus, NZ, Cad & SA.
Jieming
ISBN 981-05-5380-3
ACRS Singapore
#34
Posted 03 December 2004 - 05:25 AM
The traders in china has economical benefits to the qings i.e tax. Whereas the settlers that went abroad are generally (most if not almost all) poor southern commoners who tried their luck overseas to escape the overcrowding, lack of employment, famine, poor conditions in mainland. E.g qings do not bother much about the "sold" chinese labour "cheated" to "jin san" (san fransico). For the southeast asian (overseas) chinese, they do not pay tax and has no benefits (in addition which the nothern qing mandarins very often look down on southern china chinese). Therefore (and also pratically) qing has no "economic" reasons to bother about them even though these chinese are "son, grandsons of yan huang"(yan huang zi sun).
The ignorance of the government played a more decisive role. The government forsook its subjects in the first place. It did not encourage migration overseas as other nations that afterwards became world powers, like Britain, Spain, etc. If the government offered protection to the overseas Chinese and demanded tax payment, the latter would hardly refuse, I believe.
The North Superiority Complex is evident even today. Being a Fujianese, I find this distasteful.
#35
Posted 03 December 2004 - 11:36 AM
When it comes to the crunch, poor chinese eat tree barks and leaves too unless their more well-off relatives help.
I thought I mentioned it before but if not, I will do so again.
As impoverished as the poor Chinese Indonesians are, most if not all do have a network of friends and relatives to fall back on to avoid starvation. These friends and relatives are not necessarily well off, but they will not see their kin or kith literally go hungry. Chinese Indonesians are usually equipped for some manual labour and the Tiong Huas will find some jobs or other.
A comparison would be what I observe in America.
Excluding the illegal workers who paid "snakeheads" to smuggle them into the US without any local contacts, one can observe that the poor Chinese Americans in Chinatown have a network of friends or relatives to tide them through.
While masterminds made use of poor people, it still depends on the individual poor people "willingness" to harm/burn/loot.
This is just my personal observation, but I do believe the lower-social-strata "native Indonesians", especially the Javanese and the Madurans, tend towards hot headedness and aggressions, and demonstrated an eagerness to violence with little agitation. These two groups have a reputation even among other native Indonesian groups.
I am not saying all of them are like that. Among the Javanese and Madurans are wonderful artists, musicians etc who directed their passions in non destructive manners.
I could relate incidents I heard or witnessed, but it would just be the observations of one person.
Maybe this incident from the past will show how "unreasonable" they could be.
During the Konfrantasi incited by Sukarno, apart from border incursions in Borneo, coastal landings in Peninsular Malaysia, Indonesia also despatched a marine unit secretly into Singapore. They bombed a well known and busy commercial building, causing losses of lives.
Two of the Indonesian marines were caught, tried by the courts in Singapore and sentenced to death.
By that time, Suharto had taken over power in Indonesia and the Konfrantasi was ended. Diplomatic appeals to Singapore were rejected and the two marines were duly executed.
Years later, the then Prime Minister of Singapore had to offer flowers at the graves of the executed marines before relationship between Indonesia and Singapore could be normalised.
#36
Posted 04 December 2004 - 01:06 AM
Because unless the living standard of urban Indonesian improve,Indonesian chinese will suffer if riot broke up
But here we are encountering the cultural damage that was done because of 30 years of kleptocracy
You see javanese like japanese are very hierarchical society they looked up to the their leader or elite and usually follow whaterver the leader does or say
Now after 30 years of kleptocracy they now see that is the normal thing of doing business instead of Doing service to the the people The Indonesian elite see position in the goverment as a way to enrich oneself and one family
Not only that Indonesian political system is so outdated since most of them are direct copy from Dutch colonial goverment where the goverment duty is to control a COLONY! not to provide service to fellow citizen
I give an example most of governor, regent or other offical are appointed and not selected by the people so they have no sense of duty to the people they are only responsible to their bosses who usually expect a tribute from him! in the form of money where this poor official get the money ?
Only this year they direct presidential election ususally they the president are elected by electoral college That's way they are noramly subject to bargaining and backroom dealing It's not necessarily the best politician who become the president but the most manipulative people!
#37
Guest_ignorant_fool_*
Posted 04 December 2004 - 06:17 AM
IMO, i think you are incorrect. But this maybe due to our difference in exposure to different information. There are "good" chinese/incidents and there are "bad" chinese/incidents. Your exposure would be towards the former and mine towards the latter. But there are bad chinese/incidents. I once watch a documentary about poor indonesian chinese, about how poor they are. They are really poor, living squatters just like the other poor natives. One family lives beside a cemetery tomb because there is "no rental" fees.I thought I mentioned it before but if not, I will do so again.
As impoverished as the poor Chinese Indonesians are, most if not all do have a network of friends and relatives to fall back on to avoid starvation. These friends and relatives are not necessarily well off, but they will not see their kin or kith literally go hungry. Chinese Indonesians are usually equipped for some manual labour and the Tiong Huas will find some jobs or other.
This is a generalistic statement which suggest indonesian chinese are fundementally good, at least to their own group. But Indonesian chinese are like other chinese/humans, they are not a special group. Bad/cruel traits in chinese/humans exist in indonesian chinese too. Some help, some dont. From I heard (indonesian chinese grapevine, not baseless rumours but from people who knows/related those "bad" chinese and "victims"), some do worse than not helping. While those incidents are on micro level, the general sentiment from the ones i knew was that indonesian chinese tends to be self-caring towards themselves or their group(maybe in some cases), not as a collective indonesian chinese group. Maybe as chinese saying goes, "ren bu wei ji, tian zhu di mie" (if not for oneself, doom is there)."...most if not all do have a network of friends and relatives to fall back on to avoid starvation. These friends and relatives are not necessarily well off, but they will not see their kin or kith literally go hungry."
I would guess some would help, some wouldn't. Just like the population bell curve.A comparison would be what I observe in America.
Excluding the illegal workers who paid "snakeheads" to smuggle them into the US without any local contacts, one can observe that the poor Chinese Americans in Chinatown have a network of friends or relatives to tide them through.
There are a number of ethnic races in indonesia, javanese, madurese, sundanese, bataks, bugis, dayaks, etc. There are a number of indonesian dialects too, definitely more than five, i cant remember the article but i think more than ten.This is just my personal observation, but I do believe the lower-social-strata "native Indonesians", especially the Javanese and the Madurans, tend towards hot headedness and aggressions, and demonstrated an eagerness to violence with little agitation. These two groups have a reputation even among other native Indonesian groups.
I am not saying all of them are like that. Among the Javanese and Madurans are wonderful artists, musicians etc who directed their passions in non destructive manners.
Bugis in past, traditionally carry knife(parang,knife,etc) as part of manhood symbolism. And some of them are quick to use the weapons to settle quarrels. I was told there are certains distinct traits belonging to each ethnic races, but i am not too sure about that. I have not heard about javanese "being hotheaded" (i doubt so, i heard something more postive about them). For the madurese, I cant remember about what i heard about madurese "trait" but i think it is not "hotheaded". But for the racial "traits", i wonder as to their applicability as opposed to population bell curve. There might be cultural inclinations towards certain behaviour but not a "blanketing" characteristic.
In year 2000, there was a major conflict between dayaks and madurese in western borneo. Madurese are the new immigrants there, by suharto policy. Generally, there was tension all along, it went over the limit in year 2000 because of an incident(some varying reports of the incident). Dayaks started coming down from the mountains and forest to kill madureses. It was pretty cruel. Heads are beheaded and put on spikes. Eyewitness accounts are pretty cruel. I saw the photos of the piled up dead bodies (presumably madurese and some were speared), and among them a boy (age around 6-8) has his head beheaded and lie beside his body. The government was "late" in prevention and mediation of conflict. Hundreds of madurese died and thousands flee.
I read an article saying the indonesian government tax office registered less than one percent of personal income tax-payers as compared to the total population of tax-payers.
-> more than 99% income-holders are not paying tax i.e lost tax
-> only 1 in 100 (or 1000 or more depending how small is less than 1) pays tax.
Indonesian chinese pays for more than 80-90% of the total tax, meaning indonesian chinese contributes/pays more than 80%-90% for economic development, infrastructure, social, administration(police,army,hospitals)etc that used tax-money. This is however, what is "conveniently" overlooked by the politicians/anti-chinese elements (the general population might not know due to general low education and the likelyhood of source of information/opinion comes from their leader).
Indonesia (at currently) could not survive without indonesian chinese. But amusingly, indonesian chinese is "propagandised" as the "bane and thief" of indonesia. The idonesian chinese cant do much to the country's woe(except for PR activities) if the government is "utterly inefficient and corrupt"(-quote taken from a journalist(i think indonesian) who harshly critised indonesian government in his article.)
#38
Guest_ignorant_fool_*
Posted 04 December 2004 - 06:26 AM
The cabinet ministers choices are rife with rumours about backroom dealing. The announcement was late by 3+ hours. The decision of choices are shrouded in mystery despite the promises of "transparancy, accountability,etc" to public (till now they dun know whats going on during the 3+ hours). When the 100 days of president's report card comes, i will just read the articles about it.Only this year they direct presidential election ususally they the president are elected by electoral college That's way they are noramly subject to bargaining and backroom dealing It's not necessarily the best politician who become the president but the most manipulative people!
#39
Posted 01 February 2005 - 02:16 PM
Jews were persecuted everywhere for being successful minorities. The solution is to find a home. (not getting into the israel-palestine conflicts)
If Japan with its resource-devoid islands can support its own people, China definitely can.
Please take this into account as each of us plans our lives.
#40
Posted 10 February 2005 - 10:13 AM
**************Viewer discrestion advised*************
US$6 reward for raping a Chinese Indonesian; Ethnic Chinese men forced to rape daughters and sisters
http://www.colorq.or...esia/Reward.htm
Chinese apartment block attacked by gangs of rapists
http://www.colorq.or...esia/Vivian.htm
Ethnic Chinese teenager commits suicide after gang rape by Indonesian mob
http://www.colorq.or...sia/suicide.htm
Chinese churches and homes burned and looted; government officials pass anti-Chinese statements
http://www.colorq.or...nti_Chinese.htm
Gangs of grave robbers desecrate Chinese tombs in Indonesia
http://www.colorq.or...esia/graves.htm
Chinese woman forced to watch gang rape and burning death of her sisters
http://www.colorq.or...sia/Jakarta.htm
well.....there's many more......up to you to discover more.....
many(including me) do not know coz it's well covered up by the government
suffering'' -Yoda
아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#41
Posted 02 March 2005 - 05:28 AM
Let's face it, the Indonesian government is unbelievably corrupt and whenever the economy is doing badly in Indonesia (whether due to corruption or meddling by the IMF and/or World Bank), people look for scape goats. The Chinese community is a handy scapegoat because some of them are very rich, tend to keep to themselves and hire mostly Indonesians at low wages. There are also religious differences as well, namely between Indonesia's large Muslim population and the Chinese minority.
And so, whenever the government looks bad in the eyes of the ordinary Indonesians, they deflect all the blame onto the rich Chinese. And guess what, the average poor Indonesian believes them and then riots and violence happens. So even poor ethnic Chinese get attacked.
What is unusual about the Chinese is that they're not particularly politically active. This is going to hurt them in the future. When you think about it, many other richer ethnic minority groups tend to lobby local governments to protect their rights. Despite all this violence against the ethnic Chinese, they DON'T participate in politics. Weird. In this day and age, it's important they do.
Da jia ni men hao
Glad the fellow hua ren keep their eyes open and watch this tragedy.
As the Chinese born and grew up in indonesia, I can tell you how hard it was and is.
To date, there are some changes compare to few years back. But the discrimination is still there. There used to be www.huaren.com site, that provided quiete clear information about the "Rape of Jakarta 1998", but thanks to the hacker, that site is not so up to date.
Cheers.
#42
Posted 02 March 2005 - 05:58 AM
ISBN 981-05-5380-3
ACRS Singapore
#43
Posted 05 March 2005 - 07:50 AM
Suhana Lim, welcome! Tell us some of the experiences you've encountered as a Chinese in Indonesia. Which part are you in? Jakarta?
Liang Jieming ni hao
Thanks for the welcome. Yes, I was born and grew up in Jakarta.
Sigh! I am sure, we the hoakiau in Indo is the most racial discrimination savvy on this planet. Throughout history, so many racial incidents towards the hoa kiau, with the culmination in May 1998, The Rape of Jakarta.
The moment you are born, then you will start to face the ugly discrimination treatment. So many documentations required, which mean not only money but stress for obtaining them. Then, when you reach 17 years old, you have to arrange your ID. Again, must spend more money and stress. In your ID, because you are hoa kiau, they give "special code."
When you want to enter uni, especially state uni, no matter how good your result in the test, there is unwritten rules that the native must be prioritise for the place.
If you have an ambition to have a career in armed forces or police, civil servants better forget it!
Again, there is unwritten "understanding" that these sectors are not for hoakiau.
When it's time to leave the world, again your family must deal with the stress and of course money, to arrange the death certificate.
Cheers.
#44
Posted 06 March 2005 - 07:47 PM
BTW:miss Han and Tang Dynasty!!
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users










