Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

History of Chinese in Singapore


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

#61 snowybeagle

snowybeagle

    Sentinel of the Southern Star (鎮南星)

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 5,197 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 05 April 2006 - 10:50 PM

Speaking of the leave system in schools, if I am not wrong, aside the gazette public holidays, teachers also enjoy term leave. This would mean 7 days during the first term in March, almost 30 days in June, another 7 days in September and approximately 40 days in December. In total this would mean about 84 days’ of leave a year, ie counting in the public holidays and weekends too. Yes there are training for teachers during the school holidays too, but this is already considered as luxury compared to others working in non-teaching environment that have approximately between 12 days to 21 days a year.

Moon,

I can only say your brother is fortunate that his school allowed him to better utilise his due for annual leave.

March's term break : 2 days course + 3 days spent preparing term papers. 7 days is not an accurate count as you're including Saturday and Sunday.

Of the 4 weeks term break in June, at least half of that is spent on CCA, preparing next term's papers, another 2-4 days courses, and if one is in the WITS team ... good luck. Did I forget to mention excursions?

September term break : same as March.

Year-end term break : first and last week of the break are usually booked by the school.
In addition, teachers aren't allowed to leave Singapore without explicitly applying for annual leave.
They have to be available for the school to recall them at any time unless they are officially on leave.
Year end is also the time when they try to arrange for the teachers to fulfil the quota for number of training days.

Except for the honeymoon (3 weeks), the longest we got was 2 weeks annual leave when we could travel out of Singapore.

Basically, it means usually there's only about 2 weeks in June and 3 weeks in November-December, of which only 15 days of annual can one leave Singapore and not worry about being called back for some administrative matters or other.

And childcare leave - please produce MC for the child from the doctor. It's not a leave that one can take one's infant/toddler out for a picnic, not when the young ones are suffering from cold/cough/fever spells.

#62 Centaur

Centaur

    Chief of the Beggars

  • CHF Avatar Award
  • 6,286 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Interests:Movies, Music, Books and Travel
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 05 April 2006 - 10:56 PM

Singapore was a part of Malaysia Federation before it's independence,do Singapore ethnic Chinese retain STRONG KINSHIP with mainland Malaysia ethnic Chinese these 35 years.


I would like to think so, although, I did lost contact with my only uncle in KL. I guess someday, I will go to KL to look for him.

#63 Centaur

Centaur

    Chief of the Beggars

  • CHF Avatar Award
  • 6,286 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Interests:Movies, Music, Books and Travel
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 06 April 2006 - 12:57 AM

I would like to understand majority Singaporean-Malays' views on became a " minority ethnicity " and limited economic and or political empowerments plus government-directed BUMI entitlements comparing to fellow Malays presently in the old federation under secular Islam democratic rule.Are they CONTEND with current conditions ? Do some of the ethnic Malays yearn for re-unification with Malaysia ?


I dont know about the majority of the Malays in Singapore, but I do have a friend and she expressed unhappiness over her current lot. She said that there is not sufficient Malay representation in the Armed Forces - this being that it is a sensitive area and the people on top not willing to share power with the Malays. I really dont know how much truth in it. We did have a hoohah some years ago about it.

About being re-unified with Malaysia - right now, I doubt if there is any thoughts of it, as the Malays currently do still receive many privileges that we Chinese dont get - eg. education. So I can only hope that they are happy with the current arrangements.

#64 Edgar Liao

Edgar Liao

    Provincial Governor (Cishi 刺史)

  • Master Scholar (Juren)
  • 44 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 06 April 2006 - 08:23 AM

actually, Singapore's constitution specifically recognizes the Malays as the 'native' race in Singapore and declares that the government will help protect and ensure the rights of the Malay community in Singapore. Again, this recognition of the Malays will have to be understood in the context of Singapore's political circumstances, especially on the road to Independence haha

it is also very interesting to understand how the Singaporean Malay community view their status in Singapore. Do they tend towards hoping for the 'bumiputra' status their ethnic kind enjoy in Malaysia?
I think there is a danger in generalizing however. I have a lot of Malay friends and have encountered many other Malays in university and they proffer a diverse plethora of views. Some feel strongly 'Singaporean' than 'Malay', so reunification with Malaysia may not be a plausible option for them. However, and unfortunately, a few, and only a few in my experience, of these educated Malays do seem to be quite 'ethnocentric', in the sense that they talk to you as if they are better than you. *shrug*

About Malay representation in SAF, it's not that they don't serve National Service, it's that the chances of them posted to sensitive vocations and positions are quite low, other than those who get in because of the need to fulfill the quota system. It's largely to do with the issue of their loyalties and religious orientation bah. The authorities have to due with the question of whether, in the event of war between a Muslim neighbour and Singapore, would a Malay be able to fire at his Muslims brethen on another side. Our dear PM Lee Hsien Loong made an unequivocal statement about that a few years ago, which sparked the controversy that you mentioned. Other than PM Lee's faux pas, the discrimination is kind of an informal, unannounced thing. Another factor that may play a part in diminishing Malay representation in command positions may be that, statistically, their education qualifications tend to be comparatively lower than the rest of the ethnicities, and given our government's technocratic love of credentials and qualifications ... *shrug*

As a signallor during my National Service, i did notice that there weren't many Malays in the ranks of the signallors...




I dont know about the majority of the Malays in Singapore, but I do have a friend and she expressed unhappiness over her current lot. She said that there is not sufficient Malay representation in the Armed Forces - this being that it is a sensitive area and the people on top not willing to share power with the Malays. I really dont know how much truth in it. We did have a hoohah some years ago about it.

About being re-unified with Malaysia - right now, I doubt if there is any thoughts of it, as the Malays currently do still receive many privileges that we Chinese dont get - eg. education. So I can only hope that they are happy with the current arrangements.


[FONT=Optima]Y@ndao!

#65 urofpersia

urofpersia

    Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)

  • CHF Grand Historian Award
  • 3,174 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth - Sol System
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    none

Posted 06 April 2006 - 11:25 AM

Speaking of the leave system in schools, if I am not wrong, aside the gazette public holidays, teachers also enjoy term leave. This would mean 7 days during the first term in March, almost 30 days in June, another 7 days in September and approximately 40 days in December. In total this would mean about 84 days’ of leave a year, ie counting in the public holidays and weekends too. Yes there are training for teachers during the school holidays too, but this is already considered as luxury compared to others working in non-teaching environment that have approximately between 12 days to 21 days a year. In fact I understand that the long school leave is the main attraction that lures qualified people into joining the teaching profession. It is also a statutory requirement for organizations to provide 2-day per year of Childcare leave to a parent regardless the number of children at home. But I understand that female teachers get 5 days of Childcare leave per year per child. That means for example a mum teacher with 3 kids below seven years of age will get 5 days x 3 kids = 15 days of childcare leave per year compared to us 2 days per year even for 3 kids below age of seven. Wow! On top of 84 days school holidays + 5 days Childcare leave (assuming 1 kid), and in addition all teachers enjoy 11 days of UPA – Urgent Private Affairs leave per year. I lost count of the total leave already. Excuse me, I am not complaining here, just envying. :cry^:


I have some friends who are teachers as well and it doesn't work that way. Often their schedules are quite packed during the holidays. They *may* have a slightly easier time during holidays in the sense they don't have to manage the kids but bear in mind during term time they tend to have to get up earlier than most folks everyday and to teach in class. Now, depending on your personality, actually teaching can be a very tiring affair. I know this personally because I am involved in a lot of training in my work. Within their normal workday they also have to allocate time to mark assignments, which again can get really tiring really fast. The only thing I can think of that would keep one going is believing you are doing this for your students. Not always easy when some students obviously isn't keen on learning and disrespect the teacher.

As Snowybeagle says, teaching is very much a calling, and I salute all the good teachers out there and encourage all to do better for our future is in their hands.
Ur of Persia

#66 Moon

Moon

    Grand Marshal (Da Sima/Taiwei 大司马/太尉)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 1,278 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:SG
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Culture

Posted 06 April 2006 - 10:56 PM

Well I am becoming naggy <_< so I am not going to harp further about how the load of my job is not far better either, and how I understand that after training and field excursions the total leave is only about 4 weeks per year (or less). This is not the main gist of what I wanted to say.

Teachers’ training is ultimately beneficial to the teachers themselves, and field excursions are suppose to be fun, a time for interaction and bonding with colleagues and students. I personally don’t mind going for training if my company could afford the budget as when we join the company we are already expected to have the experience and job knowledge to perform on the job. Of course teacher’s job is more complex hence constant training and upgrading are required. But at the end of the day the teachers themselves are the ones benefit from the training. At some point of time some teachers may want to switch career and these extra training may be useful to their new posts.

My point is for our own good, we really ought to look at the glass half filled instead of half empty. I do because I am a highly self-motivated person. I have learnt long time ago, to look at the positive side of things instead of the negative. We have to take positive steps towards improving the source of stress. If there is a problem, find a resolution, solve it. Not mood and do nothing about it. Then put it behind you and never to think about it again.

Of course I respect teachers. I would love to be one if I could. No I cant because I don’t fit the bill and I dont have the qualities to become one. But I am interested in Counseling Psychology and am considering to take up this programme soon.

Anyone with the right qualification can apply for the teacher post, but remember, only the one with ** spiritual qualities will make a good teacher.

** Kindness
Patience
Honesty
Generosity


I am sorry if I sound harsh in my previous post, I really meant to help.

Cheers! B)
Posted Image
樹高千丈
落葉歸根

Even if a tree reaches the height of ten thousand feet,
Falling leaves return to their roots
.


CHF Newsleter
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=57
Han Lin Journal
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=26

#67 urofpersia

urofpersia

    Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)

  • CHF Grand Historian Award
  • 3,174 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth - Sol System
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    none

Posted 07 April 2006 - 12:37 AM

Oh, Moon, but we know you meant well! :) Never had any doubts about that.

However I think it is important to highlight to would-be teachers what they are getting into. Teaching is a sacred profession, I remember we use to have more respect for it than today. Now some see it as just another job.

Edited by urofpersia, 07 April 2006 - 12:37 AM.

Ur of Persia

#68 Centaur

Centaur

    Chief of the Beggars

  • CHF Avatar Award
  • 6,286 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Interests:Movies, Music, Books and Travel
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:00 PM

Can any of you tell me,what incentives Singapore ruling elite uses to entice local born well-educated Chinese stay home or return from study abroad as often not the case for China and Taiwan who would rather take up permanent residency in white-dominated nations than return home.

Do Singapore Chinese have a strong " SENSE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY " as Singaporean ?

Do average Singapore Chinese see LKY as " FATHER " of Singapore nation ?


1. I recalled in 1997, we actually had kinda of 'poached' people from Hong Kong, who were avoiding the return of HongKong to the mainland. I think we have limited success. As for Singaporean, many left Singapore to study overseas and remain there, but there are a number of them returning, perhaps it is because of family ties. They have family here and many would return home.

You asked about incentives - I really don't recall any incentives given. I suppose if you would look at political stability, almost crime free, a well paying job and perhaps Baby bonus for the newer generation. Someone would have to fill this gap up - I don't know enough.

2. I don't know about all the Singapore Chinese, but I can tell you one thing: The moment, they start playing the national anthem, I will stand up. I get choked up whenever, I see our flag raised up high - especially like in the SEA games, when our Sportsmen and women win for Singapore. - Ok this sounds terrible - I truly feel that way.

3. Father of Singapore? Well, no. He is too fierce to be my father. Yes, I admire him for all that he had done, but to look at him objectively - no, not yet the Father of Singapore.

#69 urofpersia

urofpersia

    Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)

  • CHF Grand Historian Award
  • 3,174 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth - Sol System
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    none

Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:03 AM

2. I don't know about all the Singapore Chinese, but I can tell you one thing: The moment, they start playing the national anthem, I will stand up.

You and me both. :-) I dont care for games or other events that Singapore participate in, probably the only time I felt pride (and great joy) was the 1993 (?) Malaysia Cup final at the Merdeka Stadium. Gosh wish I was there! Of course see where that got us with our neighbour. :blush: Guys and gals, do all the flag-waving you want on homeground but be sensitive to the feelings of others. No need to wave the flag in others' faces. (Which we literally did! :lol: )
Ur of Persia

#70 Moon

Moon

    Grand Marshal (Da Sima/Taiwei 大司马/太尉)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 1,278 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:SG
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Culture

Posted 10 April 2006 - 09:20 AM

Centuar - you are not alone on stand-up for Singapore Anthem.. <_< me too!

Edited by Moon, 10 April 2006 - 08:30 PM.

Posted Image
樹高千丈
落葉歸根

Even if a tree reaches the height of ten thousand feet,
Falling leaves return to their roots
.


CHF Newsleter
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=57
Han Lin Journal
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=26

#71 Moon

Moon

    Grand Marshal (Da Sima/Taiwei 大司马/太尉)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 1,278 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:SG
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Culture

Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:43 PM

Singapore - Independence

Singapore was separated from Malaysia on 9 August 1965, and became a sovereign, democratic and independent nation.

Independent Singapore was admitted to the United Nations on 21 September 1965, and became a member of the Common Wealth of Nations on 15 October 1965. On 22 December 1965, it became a republic, with Yusof bin Ishak as the republic's first President.

Thereafter Singapore commenced struggle to survive and prosper on its own. It also had to create a sense of national identity and consciousness among a disparate population of immigrants. Singapore's strategy for survival and development was essentially to take advantage of its strategic location and the favourable world economy.

Founding of Modern Singapore


The world's busiest port, the modern nation of the Republic of Singapore, was founded as a British trading post on the Strait of Malacca in 1819. Singapore's location on the major sea route between India and China, its excellent harbor, and the free trade status conferred on it by its visionary founder, Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, made the port an overnight success. By 1990 the multiethnic population attracted to the island had grown from a few thousand to 2.6 million Singaporeans, frequently referred to by Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew as his nation's greatest resource. If Raffles had set the tone for the island's early success, Lee had safeguarded the founder's vision through the first quarter-century of Singapore's existence as an independent nation, providing the leadership that turned it into a global city that offered trading and financial services to the region and to the world.

Modern Singapore would be scarcely recognizable to Raffles, who established his trading center on an island covered with tropical forests and ringed with mangrove swamps. Towering skyscrapers replace the colonial town he designed, and modern expressways cover the tracks of bullock carts that once led from the harbor to the commercial district and the countryside beyond. Hills have been leveled, swamps filled, and the island itself expanded in size through extensive land reclamation projects. Offshore islands are used for recreation parks, oil refineries, and military training bases. Despite the scarcity of land for real estate, the government has worked to maintain and expand the island's parks, gardens, and other green spaces. By housing 88 percent of its population in mostly multistoried public housing, Singapore has kept a rein on suburban sprawl. In Raffles's town plan, separate areas were set aside for the various ethnic groups of the time: Malays, Chinese, Arabs, Bugis, and Europeans. Government resettlement programs begun in the 1960s broke up the former ethnic enclaves by requiring that the public housing projects--called housing estates--that replaced them reflect the ethnic composition of the country as a whole. As a result, modern Singapore's three main ethnic groups--Chinese, Malays, and Indians--live next door to each other and share the same housing development facilities, shops, and transportation.

Despite efforts to maintain an ethnic balance in housing, however, the stated goal of the nation's leaders is not that Singapore become a mini-melting pot, but, rather, a multiethnic society. Of the country's 2.6 million inhabitants, about 76 percent are Chinese, 15 percent Malay, 6.5 percent Indian, and 2.5 percent other. There are, however, mixtures within this mixture. The designation Chinese lumps together speakers of more than five mutually unintelligible dialects; Singaporean Malays trace their forebears to all of the major islands of the Indonesian archipelago, as well as to the Malay Peninsula; and the ancestral homes of Indians include what are the modern states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Out of this diversity, the government leadership has attempted to establish a what is calls "Singaporean identity," which would include certain unifying and modernizing elements but yet retain essential variations, based on Asian culture and values. One of the unifying factors is the English language, selected as the medium for educational instruction both because of its neutrality in the eyes of the three dominant ethnic groups and because of its position as the international language of business, science, and technology. In order not to lose touch with their Asian heritage, however, Singaporean school children are also required to study an appropriate "mother tongue," designated by the government as either Malay, Tamil, or Mandarin Chinese--a vast oversimplification of the polyglot of Singaporean native languages.

Singaporean identity, as envisioned by the country's leadership, calls for rugged individualism with an emphasis on excellence; the government constantly exhorts its citizens to be the best they can be. Education, home ownership, and upward mobility are all considered appropriate goals. Although Singaporeans are expected to be modern in their outlook, they also are encouraged to retain a core of traditional Asian values and culture. In a society in which all share a common education system, public housing, recreation facilities, and military training, the government considers it important to highlight the uniqueness of the three official ethnic groups--Chinese, Malays, and Indians-- through the setting aside of national ethnic holidays and the sponsorship of ethnic festivals. Singaporean ethnic differences are usually maintained, however, not so much by these somewhat self-conscious displays of ethnicity but rather by membership in ethnically exclusive associations. Usually religious, charitable, or business in nature, many of these associations had their origins in colonial Singapore and represent finer distinctions of ethnicity than those supported by the government. Chinese trade associations, for example, are usually restricted to speakers of a particular dialect. Hindu temples are sometimes associated with worshipers who trace their heritage to a particular region of India.

Singapore is multi-religious as well as multi-ethnic. Major religious preferences reported in 1988 were Buddhism (28 percent), Christian (19 percent), no religion (17 percent), Islam (16 percent), Daoist (13 percent), and Hindu (5 percent). Singapore's nineteenth-century immigrants valued the social as well as religious aspects of their congregations, and their descendants are more likely to concern themselves with social activities centered around their temples and mosques than with elaborate ritual or ceremony. The government, although secular, views religion as a positive force for instilling moral values in the society. At the same time, it keeps a watchful eye out for social or political activism within religious groups. Muslim fundamentalists and over-zealous Christian proselytizers alike are kept under careful scrutiny, lest they upset the religious and ethnic harmony of the country.

Singapore closely resembles developed countries in terms of its low birth rates, high life expectancy (73.8 years at birth), and major causes of death--heart disease, cancer, and stroke. Although in the early years of independence the government mounted campaigns to lower the country's high birth rate, it became concerned in the 1980s when the rate dropped below the replacement level. Campaigns and incentives were instituted to encourage those who could afford it to have more than two children. College-educated women were especially encouraged by exhortations and incentives to marry and have children.

In terms of public health, Singapore also closely resembles developed countries. Although some observers criticize the country's modern, sanitized environment and mourn the loss of the old port's charm, they probably either have forgotten or never knew the open sewers, tuberculosis sanatoriums, and opium dens of colonial Singapore. Whereas the manufacture and sale of opium continued to be a major source of revenue for the colonial government up until World War II, the government effectively combats drug use in modern Singapore through anti-drug campaigns, rehabilitation centers, and a mandatory death penalty for trafficking. The government heavily subsidizes services in order to make them affordable to all and sets aside 6 percent of the monthly income of each worker into a personal Medisave account, which can be used to pay hospitalization costs for any family member. The Medisave account is part of the Central Provident Fund, which is Singapore's compulsory national social security savings plan. Contribution rates due to be phased in in the early 1990s mandate a contribution of 40 percent of the gross wages of employees under fifty-five, with employee and employer sharing the burden equally. Singaporeans can use these funds to invest in approved securities, to purchase homes in government housing projects, or to pay for hospitalization and retirement. By 1990 some 88 percent of Singaporeans lived in Housing and Development Board apartments, a vast public housing and urban redevelopment project initiated in the early postwar years. Under the program, which began in earnest after independence, Singapore's slums and ethnic neighborhoods gradually were replaced with modern housing estates, self-contained units providing shopping, restaurant, and recreation facilities as well as apartments of various sizes, scattered outward from the old central city. A network of superhighways and a state-of-the-art mass rapid transit system connect Singapore's housing estates with commercial and industrial areas.

Although Singapore's founder and other nineteenth-century residents would no longer recognize the island, they would at least be able to identify with certain aspects of its modern economy. The principle of free trade laid down by Raffles was still largely in effect in the late 1980s, with only a few revenue tariffs levied on such things as tobacco and liquor. Trade continued to be the island's lifeblood; in 1988 the value of Singapore's international trade was triple the total of its gross domestic product (GDP). Although some aspects of the trade have changed, others remained the same. The island's initial success resulted from its role as a conveniently located and duty-free entrepôt for the three-way trade among China, India, and various parts of the Malay Archipelago. This trade was an ancient commerce, and trading posts probably had flourished intermittently at that favored location for two millenia. In early colonial times, silks from China, manufactures from Europe, incense from India, and spices from the Moluccas all were shipped on the various seasonal trade winds to Singapore, where they were bought, sold, traded, or stored for a future customer. By the late nineteenth century, however, the British overlords of Singapore had extended their influence or control throughout the Malay Peninsula, and the port acquired a large hinterland rich in resources. Singapore became the outlet for Malaya's tin and rubber, as well as the gateway through which were funneled supplies and workers for the peninsula's mines and plantations. Tin smelting and rubber processing were added to the list of services that Singapore provided--a long list that already included wholesaling, ship repair and provisioning, warehousing, and a host of banking and financial services.

In 1990 the economy of modern Singapore was still based on the same services that were performed by the colonial port, although most of these services had been greatly expanded or modified and new ones added. The major sectors of the economy were the regional entrepôt trade, export-oriented manufacturing, petroleum refining and shipping, production of goods and services for the domestic economy, and a vastly expanded services industry.

When independence was suddenly thrust upon Singapore in 1965, its economic prospects looked bleak, if not precarious. In the aftermath of World War II, Singapore had faced staggering problems of high unemployment, slow economic growth, inadequate housing, decaying infrastructure, and labor and social unrest. Separation from Malaysia meant the loss of its economic hinterland, and Indonesia's policy of military Confrontation directed at Singapore and Malaysia had dried up the entrepôt trade from that direction. Moreover, with the announcement in 1968 of Britain's departure from the island's bases, Singapore faced the loss of 20 percent of its jobs. These problems led Singapore's leadership to take a strong role in guiding the nation's economy. The government aggressively promoted export-oriented, labor-intensive industrialization through a program of incentives designed to attract foreign investment. By 1972 one-quarter of Singapore's manufacturing firms were either foreign-owned or joint-venture companies, with the United States and Japan both major investors. The response of foreign investors to Singapore's favorable investment climate and the rapid expansion of the world economy at that time were factors in the annual double-digit growth of the country's GDP during most of the period from 1965 through 1973. By the late 1970s, however, government planners had adopted a policy of replacing Singapore's labor-intensive manufacturing with skill- and technology-intensive, high value-added industries. Information technology was particularly targeted for expansion, and by 1989 Singapore was the world's largest producer of disk drives and disk drive parts. In that year, earnings from manufacturing accounted for 30 percent of the country's GDP.

Although Singapore lost its former hinterland when it separated from Malaysia, its northern neighbor remained the leading source of primary imports and a major destination for Singapore's manufactured exports. Malaysia was Singapore's third largest overall trading partner in 1988, and Singaporean companies were major investors in Malaysia's southern state of Johor. The entrepôt trade with Indonesia had long since revived following the end of Confrontation in 1966. By the late 1980s, Singapore was the world's third largest petroleum-refining center as well as third largest oil-trading center, serving the needs of oil-rich Indonesia and Malaysia. By 1988 Singapore had nosed out Rotterdam as the world's busiest port in terms of tonnage. Some 700 shiplines used its modern facilities each year, including Singapore's own merchant fleet, which ranked fifteenth worldwide. Four major shipyards employed about 70,000 workers, about 40 percent of whom were from neighboring Asian countries.

One of the fastest growing sectors of the economy was Singapore's international banking and financial services sector, which accounted for nearly 25 percent of the country's GDP in the late 1980s. Historically, Singapore served as the financial services center for Southeast Asia, and in the late 1980s it ranked with Hong Kong as the two most important Asian financial centers after Tokyo. The government provided incentives for the continuing diversification and automation of financial services, and Singapore's political stability and top-notch infrastructure were important attractions for international bankers and investors.

Trade, manufacturing, and international financial services were closely linked in Singapore, which in 1990 hosted more than 650 multinational companies and several thousand international financial institutions and trading firms. Singapore's reliance on the international economy, over which it had little control, provided incentive for the government to play a strong role in regulating domestic conditions. Soon after independence, the government brought under control the serious labor unrest of the 1950s and early 1960s in order to present a more favorable climate for foreign investment. Discipline imposed on the labor force was counterbalanced, however, by provisions for workers' welfare. While the booming economy of the late 1960s and 1970s brought new jobs to the private sector, government provision of subsidized housing, education, health services, and public transportation created jobs in the public sector. The Central Provident Fund, built up by compulsory contributions by both employer and employee, provided the necessary capital for government projects as well as for the country's comprehensive social security scheme.

Singapore, Inc., as some observers refer to the country, spent the first twenty-five years of its independence under the same management. Led by Lee Kuan Yew, the country's first and only prime minister, the People's Action Party ( PAP) won all or nearly all of the seats in parliament in the six elections held between 1959 and 1988. Based on a British parliamentary system, with free and open elections, the Singapore government was recognized for its stability, honesty, and effectiveness. Critics complained, however, that the government's authoritarian leadership reserved for itself all power of decision making and blocked the rise of an effective opposition. A small nucleus of leaders centered around Lee had indeed closely guided the country from its turbulent preindependence days and crafted the policies that led to Singapore's economic development. During the 1980s, however, a second generation of leaders was carefully groomed to take over, and in early 1990, only Lee remained of the first generation leaders.

In late 1989, Lee announced that he would step down in late 1990 and that his successor, First Deputy Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, had already largely taken over the day-to-day management of the government. However, based on the prime minister's own assertions that he was not yet ready to relinquish all control, observers speculated on just what powers Lee would continue to hold. Goh acknowledged in late 1989 the growing sophistication and rising expectations of younger Singaporeans, who want a greater participation in the country's political life, and noted that he expected the opposition to claim a larger share of seats in parliament in the 1990s. In contrasting his leadership style with that of Lee, Goh stated that Lee "believes in firm government from the center . . . whereas our style is a little more consultative, more consensus-building." Behind Goh in the Singapore leadership queue was believed to be Lee Kuan Yew's son, Brigadier General Lee Hsien Loong, who served in the cabinet as minister for trade and industry and second minister for defence. His meteoric rise in the late 1980s through the ranks of bureaucratic and political responsibility was regarded with interest by both foreign and domestic observers.

The transition to a new generation of leaders was a phenomenon not unique to Singapore. In neighboring Malaysia and Indonesia, the independence generation was also rapidly dwindling, and the 1990s will surely mark the passing from the scene of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and President Soeharto as well as Lee Kuan Yew. The close relationship between Singapore and both its neighbors had been built to a large extent on personal ties between Lee and his counterparts in Malaysia and Indonesia. Nonetheless, the new leadership of these countries will very likely continue to build on the foundation laid by their predecessors.

In late 1989, Goh discussed the prospect of Johor State, the nearby Indonesian island of Batam (currently being developed), and Singapore forming a "triangle of growth" within the region in a cooperative rather than competitive effort. There were also signs of increased military cooperation among the three countries. Singapore, for example, conducted bilateral land exercises for the first time with both Malaysia and Indonesia in 1989. Bilateral air and naval exercises had been conducted with both countries during most of the 1980s. All three countries (along with Thailand, Brunei, and the Philippines) were members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN), formed in 1967 to promote closer political and economic cooperation within the region. The invasion of Cambodia by Vietnam in 1978 brought increased unity to the organization throughout the 1980s, as it sought to find a peaceful solution to the Cambodian problem.

Although there was considerable bilateral military cooperation among ASEAN states, the organization was not viewed by its members as a military alliance. However, Singapore and Malaysia, along with Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, were also members of the 1971 Five-Powers Defence Agreement, which provided for consultation and support by the latter three nations in the event of an attack on Singapore or Malaysia. Cooperation under the agreement diminished during the 1970s, but by the late 1980s extensive military exercises involving all five participants were again being held.

In August 1989, Lee Kuan Yew created a stir within the region by stating that Singapore was "prepared to host some United States facilities to make it easier for the Philippines to host the United States bases there." Malaysia reacted negatively to the announcement, and other ASEAN countries expressed some dismay. In October, however, the Singapore foreign ministry clarified the issue by stating that an increased use of Singapore's maintenance and repair facilities by United States ships had been agreed on by the two countries, as had short-term visits by United States aircraft to Singapore's Paya Lebar Air Base. The agreement followed a period of somewhat strained relations between the two nations, during which the United States had been critical of Singapore's use of its Internal Security Act to detain dissidents indefinitely, and Singapore had accused Washington of meddling in its internal affairs. The United States, however, was Singapore's largest trading partner and foreign investor, and the relationship was one that neither country was eager to upset.

By the last decade of the twentieth century, the former colonial port of Singapore had become a global financial, trading, and industrial center that continued to live by its wits in the world of international trade, just as it had done in the nineteenth century. Singapore's leadership and its people have always managed to adapt to the changing demands of the world economy, on which so much of their livelihood depended. In the coming decade, however, a new generation of leaders will take full control of the nation's government and economy. Before them lies the task of reconciling the need to steer a steady course in the nation's continuing development with the people's growing aspirations for an increased share in political and economic decision making.


Source : http://www.country-s...troduction.html

Edited by Moon, 10 April 2006 - 09:24 PM.

Posted Image
樹高千丈
落葉歸根

Even if a tree reaches the height of ten thousand feet,
Falling leaves return to their roots
.


CHF Newsleter
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=57
Han Lin Journal
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=26

#72 Centaur

Centaur

    Chief of the Beggars

  • CHF Avatar Award
  • 6,286 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Interests:Movies, Music, Books and Travel
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 10 April 2006 - 11:28 PM

Centuar - you are not alone on stand-up for Singapore Anthem.. <_< me too!


Cool :D

#73 yongzheng freak

yongzheng freak

    Grand Tutor (Taifu 太傅)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 329 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Interests:Movies, music (eclectic), chess, swimming, reading and eating (am singaporean, what to expect?)

Posted 12 April 2006 - 09:29 AM

Honestly, Centuar and Moon isn't alone (standing up when s'pore's national anthem is being played). The national anthme always managed to stir up intense emotion in me especially when honouring the country eg whatever games that we are taking part in and i will honestly tear when it's being played during the national day parade.
:D
Neither mother, father, nor any relative can do one greater good than one's own well-directed mind

#74 Moon

Moon

    Grand Marshal (Da Sima/Taiwei 大司马/太尉)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 1,278 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:SG
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Culture

Posted 12 April 2006 - 09:54 AM

Honestly, Centuar and Moon isn't alone (standing up when s'pore's national anthem is being played). The national anthme always managed to stir up intense emotion in me especially when honouring the country eg whatever games that we are taking part in and i will honestly tear when it's being played during the national day parade.
:D


That makes three of us :blush: i get all overwhelm whenever our national anthem is played. sniff sniff***
Posted Image
樹高千丈
落葉歸根

Even if a tree reaches the height of ten thousand feet,
Falling leaves return to their roots
.


CHF Newsleter
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=57
Han Lin Journal
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=26

#75 Hang Li Po

Hang Li Po

    State Undersecretary (Shangshu Lang 尚书郎)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 673 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Cheras, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
  • Languages spoken:Bahasa Melayu, English
  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Malaysian
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Asian History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Malai Ren, Malai Yun, Mo-lo-yu, Molo-yoou, Mali-yu-eul, Ma-lo-yu, Mo Lou Yu, Mo Lo Yu, Mo Lou Y, Mo Lou Yuu, Ma Li Yi Er, Ma La Yu, Wu Lai Yu & Wu Lai Yu, Malaysian History, Islamic History, Chinese Muslim History, Japanese Muslim History

Posted 26 April 2006 - 12:42 AM

Security act must go, says victim of 32-year ordeal South China Morning Post. Nov 28, 1998.

DEUTSCHE PRESSE-AGENTUR in Singapore

RELATED: Amnesty International statement

FORMER political detainee Chia Thye Poh, lashed out at the city-state's Internal Security Act yesterday immediately following the official end of his 32 years of prison and house arrest.

"The best part of my life was taken away just like that, without even a charge, let alone a trial in court," Chia Thye Poh, 57, said in a statement. "As a victim of the notorious Internal Security Act, I sincerely call on the government to abolish the act," the statement said.

Mr Chia - previously a university physics teacher - was detained in 1966 at the age of 25, when he was active in politics as a member of Singapore's opposition Socialist Front (Barisan Socialis) party.

Officials had said Mr Chia believed in the forceful overthrow of the People's Action Party government, an accusation he has vehemently denied throughout his captivity.

After gradually reducing restrictions on Mr Chia over the years, the government officially restored his full freedom as of yesterday.

Singapore's Internal Security Department has found that Mr Chia's conduct "suggests he is unlikely to engage in activities prejudicial to Singapore's security".

The government warned that Mr Chia would be "dealt with firmly" if he were to "re-involve himself in such activities".

But Mr Chia said he was not ruling out political involvement. "I told the Internal Security department officers that I was still interested in politics.

"I hope that with the lifting of the conditions, I will be able to talk to more people and see what I can do for the people of Singapore."

Mr Chia was imprisoned from his arrest in 1966 until 1982, after which he was detained in government "half-way" houses.

In 1989, Mr Chia was moved to a house on Singapore's offshore theme park island of Sentosa, a popular tourist destination, where he was allowed visitors.

The government let Mr Chia return to Singapore's main island in 1992 with restrictions on travel, activities and associations.

In August last year, Mr Chia was allowed to travel to Hamburg, Germany, on a one-year Hamburg Foundation academic fellowship, to study politics and economics.

Former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt had written to the Singapore government about him in the mid-1980s, Mr Chia said.

"He intervened for me, asking for my freedom."

Published in the South China Morning Post. Nov 28, 1998

Ayoo Kiasu Kiasi Land... :P
TOO PHAT feat YASIN - ALHAMDULILLAH (ENGLISH VERSION)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users