Pu Yi: Child Emperor
#1
Guest_Zhuge Zhao_*
Posted 15 November 2004 - 04:39 PM
So what do you think of him?
#2
Posted 16 November 2004 - 02:10 AM
#3
Posted 30 June 2007 - 05:52 AM
#4
Posted 30 June 2007 - 06:46 AM
#5
Posted 30 June 2007 - 08:54 AM
As for Pu Yi my evaluation of him is one of pity and sympathy. Having gain the throne in an early age during a period where the Qing collapse was inevitable, he was a mere figurehead with not much poltical significance. His ascending to the throne led him living an abnormal upbringing where he was surrounded by eunuchs and court ladies while devoided of his biological parent's care and love. His only serious fault is to work with the japanese with the vain hope of restoring the throne while this of course forever left his reputation tarnished as a traitor.He is considered as as a royalty born at the wrong place and at a wrong time, and throughout his life was used basically as a political instrument, first by Ci Xi( through her attempt of selecting a child emperor to mantain her rule), then by pigtail general Zhang Xun, followed by Japanese Imperialist( to set up manchuko) and finally by the Communist Goverment as propoganda . Truly pathetic, sad and undignify life for the Last Son of Heaven of China.
#6
Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:45 AM
#7
Posted 26 November 2010 - 03:55 AM
#8
Posted 06 February 2011 - 01:10 AM
However he is just a puppet ,miserable life...
Maybe if he didn't support japanese, he will has a better life
#9
Posted 08 March 2011 - 11:16 PM
Maybe if he didn't support japanese, he will has a better life
hmm better life in hell? He got no option. If he choose not support the Japanese he would definitely put to death.
#10
Posted 09 March 2011 - 01:11 AM
hmm better life in hell? He got no option. If he choose not support the Japanese he would definitely put to death.
What makes you say that?
#11
Posted 06 April 2011 - 11:19 AM
#12
Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:51 AM
#13
Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:56 AM
true. I can also see a similarity between him and tsar nicolas II both of becoming emperor were not their own decisions and they were the last emperors of two large countries.OK firstly his father(Zai Feng) retired from politics after the monarchy was abolished and acepted the Repuplic of China goverment and was praised by Kuomintang for distancing himself from politics and even was favourably commented on and visited by Sun Yat Sen himself. When his son Pu Yi was made the emperor of Manchuko, he invited him tojoin him in his puppet state but he decline, choosing to reamin in China and was firmly against his son decision to work with the Japanese Imperialist.
As for Pu Yi my evaluation of him is one of pity and sympathy. Having gain the throne in an early age during a period where the Qing collapse was inevitable, he was a mere figurehead with not much poltical significance. His ascending to the throne led him living an abnormal upbringing where he was surrounded by eunuchs and court ladies while devoided of his biological parent's care and love. His only serious fault is to work with the japanese with the vain hope of restoring the throne while this of course forever left his reputation tarnished as a traitor.He is considered as as a royalty born at the wrong place and at a wrong time, and throughout his life was used basically as a political instrument, first by Ci Xi( through her attempt of selecting a child emperor to mantain her rule), then by pigtail general Zhang Xun, followed by Japanese Imperialist( to set up manchuko) and finally by the Communist Goverment as propoganda . Truly pathetic, sad and undignify life for the Last Son of Heaven of China.
#14
Posted 11 September 2011 - 12:38 PM
人在江湖,身不由己。
Edited by Swordsman, 11 September 2011 - 12:39 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











