Who was Qin Shi Huang's father?
#1
Guest_Liu Bang_*
Posted 18 November 2007 - 02:29 AM
What do you gusy think?
#2
Posted 18 November 2007 - 03:05 AM
#3
Posted 18 November 2007 - 04:53 AM
Recently, many historians are arguing over the real identity of Qin Shi Huang. Is his father Lu Buwei or Qin Zhuang Xiang wang? In books, the answer remains a mystery but in television shows, it is usually Lu Buwei. Zhao Ji (Qin Shi Huang's mother) was with both of them (Lu Buwei and Qin Zhuang Xiang wang) but since DNA could not be tested last time, the answer remains a mystery. I guess this will be a mystery forever.
The idea that Qin Shihuang is illegitimate is very old. In fact, the main source for this theory (and, in fact, the main source for all stories about this era) is Sima Qian.
Here's the passage from the Lu Buwei chapter (other chapters on Qin Shihuang, do not have this story, neither does, I think, the Zhanguoce)
呂 不 韋 取 邯鄲 諸 姬 絕 好 善 舞 者 與 居 , 知 有 身 。 子 楚 從 不 韋 飲 , 見 而 說 之 , 因 起 為 壽 , 請 之 。 呂 不韋 怒 , 念業 已 破 家 為 子 楚 , 欲 以 釣 奇 , 乃 遂 獻 其 姬 。 姬 自 匿 有 身 , 至 大 期 時 , 生 子 政 。 子 楚 遂 立 姬 為夫 人 。
Lü Buwei had, among his concubines in Handan, a very beautiful and gracious dancer. He lived with her, and knew she was expecting. One day, as Zichu had followed Lü Buwei to a banquet, he saw her and admired her. As she rose to wish him a long life, Zichu asked for her. Lü Buwei was incensed, but he pondered that he had already ruined his house on behalf of Zichu, in order to capture a rare thing. So he offered her his concubine, who hid her pregnancy. After a long time, she gave birth to a son named Zheng. Zichu then made the concubine his first spouse.
(A complete translation of the chapter can be found here : http://www.chinahist...showtopic=14716)
Personally, I would doubt the Lu Buwei chapter: its rather odd style suggest that it has been edited a lot, and it is full of extravagant anecdotes, sometimes bordering on the grotesque... But I understand that filmmakers would love it. It has a great cast : the crafty merchant, the exotic dancer (who incidentally is named Zhao, so she might actually be a princess in disguise...), the weak Qin prince who serves as a hostage, and then, the false eunuch...
Francois
#4
Guest_Liu Bang_*
Posted 18 November 2007 - 06:48 AM
Lü Buwei had, among his concubines in Handan, a very beautiful and gracious dancer. He lived with her, and knew she was expecting. One day, as Zichu had followed Lü Buwei to a banquet, he saw her and admired her. As she rose to wish him a long life, Zichu asked for her. Lü Buwei was incensed, but he pondered that he had already ruined his house on behalf of Zichu, in order to capture a rare thing. So he offered her his concubine, who hid her pregnancy. After a long time, she gave birth to a son named Zheng. Zichu then made the concubine his first spouse.
Francois
I know about all this, but I guess probably no one will know who Ying Zheng's father really is...........
#5
Posted 18 November 2007 - 07:08 AM
#6
Posted 18 November 2007 - 07:28 AM
In addition, even if Lu Buwei was the father, how did the public know this fact that even Sima Qian know about the story several hundred years later?
#7
Guest_Liu Bang_*
Posted 19 November 2007 - 09:26 PM
Professors John Knoblock and Jeffrey Riegel say that the story of Lü being the father are "patently false, meant both to libel Lü and to cast aspersions on the Fisrt Emperor." (LSCQ p. 9)
I think they draw this conclusion according to their own opinions.
#8
Posted 28 November 2007 - 07:13 AM
#9
Posted 28 November 2007 - 10:35 AM
I think, that's inposible. If Lu Buwei really is the father of Qin Shi Huang, then how come King Zhuangxiang did'nt realise it? however, in TV shows, it is really very interesting to made Lu Buwei the father of Qin Shi Huang. it makes the show more interesting.
It also made Shi Ji more interesting. I guess everyone loves gossip magazines, including the ancient Chinese!
#10
Posted 28 November 2007 - 10:46 AM
I think, that's inposible. If Lu Buwei really is the father of Qin Shi Huang, then how come King Zhuangxiang did'nt realise it?
Maybe she wasn't showing yet.
#11
Posted 01 December 2007 - 11:29 PM
But I digress. On the matter at hand I think that in all probability Lu Buwei was not the biological father of Ying Zheng, Qin Shi Huang. I must agree with Francois, there is something very odd about the chapter on Lu Buwei in the Shiji. I can't really say for sure why but I doubt the validity of the chapter, which is also odd. I also wonder if the one we have now is the original that the Grand Historian wrote. It seems too artificial, but maybe that is a product of the translation process. Food for thought hmm?....
Anyway in my personal opinion that while there is a possibility that Lu Buwei did have some role in the meeting of Ying Zichu and Lady Zhao it was no more then this, if I even dare go that far. Ying Zheng was Zichu's son, of that I am convinced. More probable then not this whole business started as a result of the traditional disdain of the Confucian gentry that rose to power during the Han for Qin Shi Huang. I wouldn't put it below them to call the paternity of the First Emperor into question. From there it is just a short hop to doubting his sanity, and we know the Confucian gentry did that! But I wander.... Sorry.
Anyway that is my cents.
#12
Guest_Liu Bang_*
Posted 02 December 2007 - 06:52 AM
Actually this is a pretty interesting subject. Sima Qian certainly had a talent for bringing such interesting matters to light for us, centuries later, to ponder.
But I digress. On the matter at hand I think that in all probability Lu Buwei was not the biological father of Ying Zheng, Qin Shi Huang. I must agree with Francois, there is something very odd about the chapter on Lu Buwei in the Shiji. I can't really say for sure why but I doubt the validity of the chapter, which is also odd. I also wonder if the one we have now is the original that the Grand Historian wrote. It seems too artificial, but maybe that is a product of the translation process. Food for thought hmm?....
Anyway in my personal opinion that while there is a possibility that Lu Buwei did have some role in the meeting of Ying Zichu and Lady Zhao it was no more then this, if I even dare go that far. Ying Zheng was Zichu's son, of that I am convinced. More probable then not this whole business started as a result of the traditional disdain of the Confucian gentry that rose to power during the Han for Qin Shi Huang. I wouldn't put it below them to call the paternity of the First Emperor into question. From there it is just a short hop to doubting his sanity, and we know the Confucian gentry did that! But I wander.... Sorry.
Anyway that is my cents.
Yes, Lu Buwei spent some time with Lady Zhao before she was introduced to Qin Zhuang Xiang wang.
Whether Ying Zheng was Zichu's son or not, I guess no one would know now.......
#13
Posted 02 January 2008 - 04:39 AM
This is definitely a controversial issue as we will never arrive to a positive answer due to the lack of information presented to us.
The only thing we could be certain about this topic is that Zhao Ji had been Lu Buwei’s concubine before being officially married to Qin Zhuang Xiang Wang. With this in mind, Zhao Ji herself might not even have been aware of her own son’s paternity. However, there are three clues pointing towards Qin Shihuang being of royal blood.
1.] Qin Shihuang was born 14 months after the official marriage of his parents.
2.] If the rumors that Qin Shihuang was the actual son of Lu Buwei were truly believable at the time, then there would be rebellions everywhere in the state of Qin because of the current king’s illegitimacy. There was indeed only one minor rebellion staged by Qin Shihuang’s younger half brother and General Pan; however, it was quelled rather quickly.
3.] Fireball has a very valid point stating that how would Sima Qian have known all the minute details of the incidents in order to create a complete account in the Shi Ji?
Therefore, I think Qin Shihuang was of actual royalty; however, the rumor that he was really the son of Lu Buwei was simply a possibility, which was bolstered by TV series as the real truth behind the story.
I am normally very critical regarding how TV series distort history; however, I must admit the directors/producers did not create something so absurd this time as this was something actually recorded in the Shi Ji. We are just doubting the validity of the “original text” itself.
http://59.151.27.202...goto=nextnewset
http://www.chinahist...ch/page__st__15
http://6.cn/playlist/174122-6
#14
Guest_Liu Bang_*
Posted 04 January 2008 - 05:06 AM
I doubt the validity of the chapter, which is also odd. I also wonder if the one we have now is the original that the Grand Historian wrote. It seems too artificial, but maybe that is a product of the translation process.
It's true. Sometimes, people of later generations tend to change some parts of history.
#15
Posted 10 December 2008 - 04:15 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











