chinese dao vs japanese katana
#16
Posted 07 February 2005 - 12:36 AM
#17
Posted 07 February 2005 - 05:45 PM
katanas, the most recent incarnation of them, are 'draw-cut' blades. They shear through flesh and bone by the blade making contact, then being 'pulled'. Kinda like cutting a big vegetable by laying the blade on top, then sliding it back. It just draws through it. That kind of cut won't go through iron though. I guess you could chop, but it wouldn't be that effective.I'm not sure about the Katana's armor penetration ability, but I wouldn't say it was incapable of penetrating iron armor...if it was a high quality blade.
I've heard that the usual method of fighting armor was, if possible, shear off the straps holding the lamellar together, or thrust and strike with the tip.
I figure the no-dachi had to have been used against armor, so could it cut through armor too?
And is it only the straight-edge zhanmadao that cuts through armor?
#18
Posted 07 February 2005 - 08:07 PM
this is confusing to me......i thought katanas are heavy when they are held two-handed.....
I assume you mean that you think katans must be heavy as they are held in a two-handed grip.
You'll find that the katana is held very losely with the left hand, with the right hand above it bearing most of the weight (that is, if one is right-handed). The left hand mainly assists in control.
His fingers on the sand;
The breakers foamed about his feet,
And broke across his hand.
#19
Posted 08 February 2005 - 10:52 AM
this is confusing to me......i thought katanas are heavy when they are held two-handed.....
If you read the Book of Five Rings by the 16th/17th Century ronin swordsman Miyamoto Musashi he advocates that a competent swordsman needs to be able to handle two swords simultaneously, since it created larger arcs of motion and effectiveness.
#20
Posted 09 February 2005 - 10:14 PM
is pudao and zhanmadao are the same?
PuDao

Zhanmadao(bottom)
Sun Tzu found alive!
Help your moderators, use the "Report Post to Moderator" button.
#21
Posted 10 February 2005 - 02:39 AM
suffering'' -Yoda
아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#22
Posted 10 February 2005 - 08:57 AM
#23
Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:44 AM
suffering'' -Yoda
아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#24
Posted 10 February 2005 - 11:36 PM
#25
Posted 11 February 2005 - 02:46 AM
A parang is a type of Malay single-edged knife for clearing vegetation. I would say that essentially it looks similar to a dao, but is shorter.
for clearing vegetation?does it used for the actual combat in South East Asia other than keris?
suffering'' -Yoda
아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#26
Posted 11 February 2005 - 09:00 AM
But I would think that the Parang would be a little more utility oriented than the Dao, which is specifically meant to kill others.
#27
Posted 20 February 2005 - 11:34 PM
#28
Posted 21 February 2005 - 01:04 AM
Welcome to CHF, Zuwairi - are you Malay?
#29
Posted 21 February 2005 - 08:45 PM
One must understand that nothing back then was strictly standardized. The design of the weapon depended greatly on the army it equips. So if a general wanted a longer handle for the Song dynasty Zhanmadao, chances are he would just continue to call it Zhanmadao despite the fact that we may consider it to be a different weapon already.
#30
Posted 21 February 2005 - 09:24 PM
But why does no one take me seriously when I point out that the 'Pudao' is actually pronounced as 'Podao'?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












