I was wondering . . . . would it not make sense to have a separate Zhou Dynasty or Shang Dynasty section instead of grouping everything under ""Pre-Qin and Qin"?
Shang Dynasty
#1
Posted 12 February 2005 - 06:49 PM
I was wondering . . . . would it not make sense to have a separate Zhou Dynasty or Shang Dynasty section instead of grouping everything under ""Pre-Qin and Qin"?
#2
Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:00 PM
#3
Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:09 PM
It just doesn't seem right that more than 1500 years of Chinese history is combined under one heading. But, that's just me
#4
Posted 13 February 2005 - 12:04 AM
Funny guy
![]()
It just doesn't seem right that more than 1500 years of Chinese history is combined under one heading. But, that's just me
Xiangyu has a point, however, i just think the groupings should be more like
Pre-Imperial(neolithic to Warring States)
Qin/Han
Three Kingdoms
Age of fragmentation
and so forth and so on
but whats done is done, theres nothing bad about how the forum is currently set up.
#5
Posted 13 February 2005 - 03:02 AM
#6
Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:34 AM
Hi YunWell guys, when we opened up the Historical Period sections, we had hardly any threads on anything before the Qin, so we weren't confident about a Shang or Zhou section working out. Nor were we sure that Warring States or Qin could be sufficient on their own, so we grouped them together. But if the amount of discussion on pre-Qin history reaches a high enough level, we can consider changing the present format.
That's what I figured. Although I have seen many posts about the Qin Dynasty, I haven't seen an abundance of Western Zhou/Chunqiu or Shang era posts. There are 'plenty' of records about that period in existence, but it seems not too many people are interested in it besides me.
That's fine
#7
Posted 13 February 2005 - 09:47 AM
Too bad it's classified under 'CHF articles', because the translation work is so extensive. I was very tempted to put it in the Pre-Qin section.
#8
Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:56 AM
#9
Posted 14 February 2005 - 07:46 AM
#10
Posted 15 February 2005 - 08:55 PM
I think the suggestion of Pre-Imperial and Qin/Han is good..but I think the current layout is fine..for pre-Qin and Qin


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
#11
Guest_庞贯哲_*
Posted 26 March 2005 - 04:56 PM
While Xia is obscure, probably a Sino-Tibetan tribe in Shanxi, Shang is likely a Tungusic or Koreic tribe in eastern Henan.
And Zhou was perhaps a Qiang-ized Turkic tribe from Shaanxi.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












