Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Blocking arrows using Sword


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 General_Zhaoyun

General_Zhaoyun

    Grand Valiant General of Imperial Han Army

  • Admin
  • 12,051 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore (Taiwanese/Singapore Permanent Resident)
  • Interests:Chinese History, Chinese Philosophy and Religion, Chinese languages, Minnan/Taiwanese language, Classical Chinese, General Chinese Culture
  • Languages spoken:Mandarin, Taiwanese (Hokkien), English, German, Singlish
  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Taiwanese Hoklo)
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Language, History and Culture

Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:16 AM

In the RoTK TV series, I've seen chinese infantry soldiers or horsemen trying to block arrows fired from enemy archers using their own sword.

Just wonder how effective this defence tactic is? Do the infantry still require shield?
Posted ImagePosted Image

"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮

One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang

#2 Tyler

Tyler

    Prime Minister (Situ/Chengxiang 司徒/丞相)

  • CHF Beginner
  • 1,886 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My interests are very common to most young people. I love meeting new people and hanging with friends. I always have had a interest and expertise in Computer Networking but I also enjoy the great out doors; swimming, camping, hiking, biking are great ways to pass the time.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Other Interests
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Networking

Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:42 AM

It's uneffective to be sure that was an "effect" to liven up the TV series.

#3 Long Dragon

Long Dragon

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • CHF Beginner
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Chatham, kent , england
  • Interests:Archery, Karate, Tai Chi, Military tactic, Daoism, Buddism, Ancinet cultures, my girlfriend

Posted 22 February 2005 - 09:50 AM

It's uneffective to be sure that was an "effect" to liven up the TV series.

View Post

i totally agree with Liu Ce, while it is possible to do, you need extreme skill with the sword, also different bows have different poundages which means that some arrows travel faster than others, so you wouldnt be able to do it agaisnt any old archer, especially a group. shields i consdier a nesscity in a battle, well i do like ancient greece as well so i might be biased, but they are all round goodness, they can stop sword,spear and light axe attacks and stop some arrows, crossbows can punch thorugh sheilds thought

#4 Sephodwyrm

Sephodwyrm

    Vanguard of Zhan Guo (战国先锋)

  • CHF Beginner
  • 2,711 posts
  • Location:Tucson, Arizona, US of A
  • Interests:Upsetting regional imbalances
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Warring States Military, Chinese Sketches and Artwork

Posted 22 February 2005 - 10:40 AM

Crossbows made shields pretty useless...

But I think the silk undergarments or the paddings help the Chinese soldiery survive arrows.
Maxim-Ivan Illustrations
Chief Editor and Founder
Our Deviantart Site

#5 TMPikachu

TMPikachu

    Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)

  • CHF Grand Historian Award
  • 2,542 posts

Posted 22 February 2005 - 03:01 PM

survive, but it can still take you outta the fight. The obvious benefit is being able to fight another day (or if you're the soldier, not dying!). It'd also allow for more experienced soldiers and commanders to be running about.
I guess if a hail of arrows is coming at you, and you've got nothing but a sword, at the very least, one would try to deflect it, 'cause there's nothing else to do.

I would say it's an act of desperation, not to be relied on.

On silk underarmor, when did it come around? how common was it? (whole armies? or just elites/commanders in silk?)
"the way has more than one name, and wise men have more than one method. Knowledge is such that it may suit all countries, so that all creatures may be saved..."

#6 Wujiang

Wujiang

    Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)

  • Visiting Scholar
  • 2,046 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Art of War
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Chinese Military, Weapons Science, Martial Arts, Daoist and Buddhist Psychology, Mythology & Ancient Chinese philosophy

Posted 22 February 2005 - 07:27 PM

It is theoretically possible for one to deflect arrows using swords. I would be inclinde to believe that at least some exception people are able to do it. However, I think the question isn't really about whether or not it is possible but rather how cost effective they in terms of training an entire army to do it. Simply put, the skills required to perfect the sword-against-arrow technique would require so much time that you simply won't train your entire army to do so. Especially true since a nice wooden/metal board would do the job much better. Think about it, all it takes is one slip and the error would be fatal while with a shield, you just hold it up. You might as well spend the time to train them in other things like shooting arrows.
包容天下之心,明明仁義之念,開天闢地之志

#7 Moping4U

Moping4U

    Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 225 posts

Posted 22 February 2005 - 07:32 PM

uhhh....I think i better hide behind a shield.

#8 HaSY

HaSY

    State Undersecretary (Shangshu Lang 尚书郎)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Still studying in Malaysia
  • Interests:World history!!!

Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:46 PM

blocking arrows using sword is possible is kinda like a Jedi Knight blocking blaster bolts.......
using shields is the most practical way than spending too much in training to block arrows using swords.
''Fear leads to anger,anger leads to hate,hate leads to
suffering'' -Yoda

아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

#9 Long Dragon

Long Dragon

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • CHF Beginner
  • 11 posts
  • Location:Chatham, kent , england
  • Interests:Archery, Karate, Tai Chi, Military tactic, Daoism, Buddism, Ancinet cultures, my girlfriend

Posted 23 February 2005 - 09:39 AM

See i said sheilds where good lol :)

#10 Yang Zongbao

Yang Zongbao

    General of the Yang Clan

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 2,758 posts
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Weapons, Chinese Martial Arts

Posted 23 February 2005 - 12:40 PM

But again, both Crossbows and Composite bows have the capability to punch through shields and armor...you'd have to make some pretty d**** thick shields of pretty d**** hard material to stop a bolt or arrow from one of these...but I think that the Chinese did make shields to stop these powerful arrows.
Posted Image

#11 ih8eurocentrix

ih8eurocentrix

    State Undersecretary (Shangshu Lang 尚书郎)

  • Novice Scholar (Tongsheng)
  • 618 posts
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Art of War
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Chinese Military

Posted 23 February 2005 - 05:06 PM

what i dont understand is if its so easy for crossbows to punch through armour and sheild,even european armour couldnt stop crossbow(plate?),
so why is it that Jurchen double lameller armour was able to stop crossbows,if so why didnt the chinese just shoot the jurchen horse surely that wasnt armoured with double lameller armour,,

#12 Yang Zongbao

Yang Zongbao

    General of the Yang Clan

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 2,758 posts
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Weapons, Chinese Martial Arts

Posted 23 February 2005 - 05:26 PM

The Horses were often armored too, if I recall, such as those in the Guaizima formation.
It took hooks and Zhanmadao to bring those down I think.
Posted Image

#13 wlee15

wlee15

    Grand Mentor (Taishi 太师)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 433 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 23 February 2005 - 06:40 PM

what i dont understand is if its so easy for crossbows to punch through armour and sheild,even european armour couldnt stop crossbow(plate?),
so why is it that Jurchen double lameller armour was able to stop crossbows,if so why didnt the chinese just shoot the jurchen horse surely that wasnt armoured with double lameller armour,,

View Post


Most European crossbows were designed for a very powerful bolt at the expense of speed of reloading. Some of them were even made out steel and required a winching mechanism to load. The early development of crossbows in China likely prevented the development of any type of heavy armor and so Chinese crossbows would be more effective in increasing the ease of use of the crossbow rather than increasing it's pentrative capability.

#14 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 23 February 2005 - 08:55 PM

In the RoTK TV series, I've seen chinese infantry soldiers or horsemen trying to block arrows fired from enemy archers using their own sword.

Just wonder how effective this defence tactic is? Do the infantry still require shield?

View Post

There's a direct reference to a character blocking an arrow with his sword in Water Margin, so this concept was already known at least to the author during the Yuan/Ming dynasty.

#15 Moping4U

Moping4U

    Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 225 posts

Posted 23 February 2005 - 11:03 PM

Has anyone ever thought of using the bodies of your dead enemies as shields?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users