Blocking arrows using Sword
#1
Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:16 AM
Just wonder how effective this defence tactic is? Do the infantry still require shield?


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
#2
Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:42 AM
#3
Posted 22 February 2005 - 09:50 AM
i totally agree with Liu Ce, while it is possible to do, you need extreme skill with the sword, also different bows have different poundages which means that some arrows travel faster than others, so you wouldnt be able to do it agaisnt any old archer, especially a group. shields i consdier a nesscity in a battle, well i do like ancient greece as well so i might be biased, but they are all round goodness, they can stop sword,spear and light axe attacks and stop some arrows, crossbows can punch thorugh sheilds thoughtIt's uneffective to be sure that was an "effect" to liven up the TV series.
#4
Posted 22 February 2005 - 10:40 AM
But I think the silk undergarments or the paddings help the Chinese soldiery survive arrows.
#5
Posted 22 February 2005 - 03:01 PM
I guess if a hail of arrows is coming at you, and you've got nothing but a sword, at the very least, one would try to deflect it, 'cause there's nothing else to do.
I would say it's an act of desperation, not to be relied on.
On silk underarmor, when did it come around? how common was it? (whole armies? or just elites/commanders in silk?)
#6
Posted 22 February 2005 - 07:27 PM
#7
Posted 22 February 2005 - 07:32 PM
#8
Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:46 PM
using shields is the most practical way than spending too much in training to block arrows using swords.
suffering'' -Yoda
아론 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------谭伟伦-----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#9
Posted 23 February 2005 - 09:39 AM
#10
Posted 23 February 2005 - 12:40 PM
#11
Posted 23 February 2005 - 05:06 PM
so why is it that Jurchen double lameller armour was able to stop crossbows,if so why didnt the chinese just shoot the jurchen horse surely that wasnt armoured with double lameller armour,,
#12
Posted 23 February 2005 - 05:26 PM
It took hooks and Zhanmadao to bring those down I think.
#13
Posted 23 February 2005 - 06:40 PM
what i dont understand is if its so easy for crossbows to punch through armour and sheild,even european armour couldnt stop crossbow(plate?),
so why is it that Jurchen double lameller armour was able to stop crossbows,if so why didnt the chinese just shoot the jurchen horse surely that wasnt armoured with double lameller armour,,
Most European crossbows were designed for a very powerful bolt at the expense of speed of reloading. Some of them were even made out steel and required a winching mechanism to load. The early development of crossbows in China likely prevented the development of any type of heavy armor and so Chinese crossbows would be more effective in increasing the ease of use of the crossbow rather than increasing it's pentrative capability.
#14
Posted 23 February 2005 - 08:55 PM
There's a direct reference to a character blocking an arrow with his sword in Water Margin, so this concept was already known at least to the author during the Yuan/Ming dynasty.In the RoTK TV series, I've seen chinese infantry soldiers or horsemen trying to block arrows fired from enemy archers using their own sword.
Just wonder how effective this defence tactic is? Do the infantry still require shield?
ISBN 981-05-5380-3
ACRS Singapore
#15
Posted 23 February 2005 - 11:03 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












