Paper Armour?
#1
Posted 24 February 2005 - 08:11 AM
Is this correct, and if so, how widespread was its usage and when?
#2
Posted 24 February 2005 - 11:10 AM
Last night I saw on BBC2 the episode of 'What the Ancients Did For Us' about China. Among features on silk, flamethrowers, gunpowder, paper, calligraphy, printing, attempts at flight, bridges, and seismographic equipment, there was the briefest of mentions for paper armour (with a silk backing).
Is this correct, and if so, how widespread was its usage and when?
A small section from my Chinese Armour essay
Zhijia (纸甲), or paper armour originated during the Tang dynasty. It was said that this form of armour was made during the reign of Tangyizong (859 – 873 CE). During the Song-Hsia Wars, thirty thousand of this form of armour was made and worn by the besieged archers of the Song dynasty in the fortress in Shanxi. It was made from a form of processed paper being one to three inches thick. Under wet conditions such as rain the material would turn even tougher making it a valuable form of defence against arrows. This was an important tactical advantage of paper armour as metal armour, despite providing a much better protection, would rust under these conditions. Other advantages of this form of armour includes its lightness allowing perhaps the greatest form of mobility among all armour styles. Lightness was essential and hence the paper armour being one of the more preferred form of armour in areas of the south where there are a large amount of rivers and forests. During the campaign by General Qi Jiguang against the Japanese pirates, a large number of his troops wore this form of armour as it was effective against the firearms of the time. In addition, it was extremely flexible as well as cheap to produce.
#3
Posted 24 February 2005 - 12:00 PM
I guess it would be sorta like a modern day flak vest.
#4
Posted 25 February 2005 - 09:53 AM
#5
Posted 25 February 2005 - 12:21 PM
Although there is no support for this claim, this image seems to indicate that the paper armour used lamellar type construction......
#6
Posted 25 February 2005 - 02:36 PM
I have the book that image is in. So, is that look where the head fits through? Then this paper armor would be of the simplest pattern, a front and back.
#7
Posted 25 February 2005 - 10:47 PM
#8
Posted 25 February 2005 - 11:34 PM
Does he say that? I ought to check again. I do see him mentioning that scale remained around for a long long time. That I sorta disagree with. I can see it for ceremonial/fancy lookin' armor, but lamellar's just better for fighting. He doesn't get mountan-pattern-scale right either (though the 'lion armor' picture is neat)Yes, that pic is from the Wubei Zhi of the Ming and looks more like paper scales on a backing of leather. I don't agree with Robinson's view in "Oriental Armour", however, that the standard Chinese armour was scale rather than lamellar.
#9
Posted 02 March 2005 - 03:41 AM
Therefor, its existence is a crime, and the punishment is death - thirdgumi
#10
Posted 02 March 2005 - 04:50 PM
#12
Posted 02 March 2005 - 09:55 PM
#13
Posted 03 March 2005 - 06:15 AM
#14
Posted 03 March 2005 - 06:15 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












