Gavin Menzies' Zheng He Theory
#31
Posted 07 July 2004 - 08:42 PM
if you actually read his book and examine it, you will also see how the many critiques of menzies' book reveals his "evidence" to be a whole bunch of mumbo-jumbo.
#32
Posted 08 July 2004 - 01:13 PM
The thing is that we should, on the pretext of Menzies' work, start other projects and investigate more about the voyages of Ma San Bao. It is useless just sitting around and criticizing. Recent news from the Chinese archaeological department is that they are probably going to spend some serious money looking more deeply into the matter. I think this is the better way to go.
#33
Posted 08 July 2004 - 06:53 PM
"We Vandals get blamed for stuff that was actually done by some errant Lombard or Visigoth"
"Nationalism is much about forgetting as it is about remembering"
China historical vacation 2011 photos and videos: http://www.chinahist...na-trip-photos/
#34
Posted 08 July 2004 - 10:44 PM
i have problems with this sort of sensationalist literature. many, many critiques have been done of menzies work ranging from taida in taiwan to the full gamut of US and british universities, including UC berkeley, UCSD, stanford, harvard, princeton, oxford...etc etc. certainly not just "european bias." the taiwanese magazine "sinorama" (guang hua) just did an article about this.
#35
Posted 17 July 2004 - 05:19 PM
"We Vandals get blamed for stuff that was actually done by some errant Lombard or Visigoth"
"Nationalism is much about forgetting as it is about remembering"
China historical vacation 2011 photos and videos: http://www.chinahist...na-trip-photos/
#36
Posted 18 July 2004 - 01:25 AM
#37
Posted 22 July 2004 - 08:02 AM
#38
Posted 22 July 2004 - 12:09 PM
So what about the DNA. Can you tell me its not sketchy, I mean from the map all the indian nations on the coast had Chinese linked DNA. The counter argument is that the theory of the Asian crossing over the ice bridge, but that wouldn't explain why only coastal DNA is like Chinese.
I don't believe the light house was Chinese, but that rock road was left by the Chinese. Its too perfect to be natural, and it makes perfect sense the reason for it. They need a kinda of ramp for the ships.
I think the Italian explorer didn't metion the Chinese that much is because, Europeans are tradionally nationalists, and have been know to lie about things. Who would want to come back home and admit that there is someone WAY WAY beyond you.
Think about it 28,000 some men, no matter how rich you are, you don't send that many men to just trade, they were going on a long journey.
Only problem is the records have been burned, and we will probaley never be for sure in what happened. But no one can denine that something in History is worng.
#39
Posted 23 July 2004 - 01:26 PM
of which I would think are the most important supporting contentions for Menzies' main thesis.
#40
Posted 23 July 2004 - 03:35 PM
#41
Posted 23 July 2004 - 05:29 PM
to Ghost of Han: im not trying to bring him down, i want to believe that china reached America first as much as he did. Its just i cannot believe in theories that have way too many holes in them.
#42
Posted 23 July 2004 - 09:36 PM
http://www.1421.tv/gallery.asp#
Or on Menzies' suggestion that the Chinese built an earlier version of the Panama Canal? http://www.1421.tv/p...?EvidenceID=194
(contrary to the title, he doesn't say anything about the Egyptians)
#43
Posted 24 July 2004 - 02:19 AM
I personally believe that Menzies is a fraud, and the show proves it. Menzies' inability to respond to the criticize presented to him shows how groundless his theory is. All he could say was "i accept that" when presented with experts saying that da Conti never mentions Chinese or travels to China, or how the map does not really say "volcano erupted here", or when Chinese experts said that Zhou Wen returned home early. He's basically agreeing that he never really did any indepth research, and his claims are fradulent!
All he did was assume things, and they posed questions at him, that he had no way to give a good reponse. They just skewd him. All the facts are kinda blurry, but the fact remains, there was a map made long before Colmbus, the NAtive american DNA on the Coast is that of Chinese and Europeans were known for lying, so I bet they know there weren't the first and just lied about it.
#44
Guest_Thanol_*
Posted 24 July 2004 - 10:34 AM
Does he ever give out details on the DNA evidence, I mean really NA and Chinese are part of the same race so of course we're going to be related.I personally believe that Menzies is a fraud, and the show proves it. Menzies' inability to respond to the criticize presented to him shows how groundless his theory is. All he could say was "i accept that" when presented with experts saying that da Conti never mentions Chinese or travels to China, or how the map does not really say "volcano erupted here", or when Chinese experts said that Zhou Wen returned home early. He's basically agreeing that he never really did any indepth research, and his claims are fradulent!
All he did was assume things, and they posed questions at him, that he had no way to give a good reponse. They just skewd him. All the facts are kinda blurry, but the fact remains, there was a map made long before Colmbus, the NAtive american DNA on the Coast is that of Chinese and Europeans were known for lying, so I bet they know there weren't the first and just lied about it.
#45
Posted 29 July 2004 - 09:12 AM
For those of you who missed it, here is a BitTorrent file for it.
http://66.90.75.92/s...America.torrent
Yeah, in your face DaMo. :P
[Mod: Kulong, I've merged this into the original thread for you]
"You can believe in any god, as long as it's our God."
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











