The origin of Chinese people is revealed
#1
Posted 19 April 2009 - 02:47 AM
#2
Posted 19 April 2009 - 11:00 PM


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
#3
Posted 20 April 2009 - 10:30 AM
Interesting.. is this a new research or theory?
This is not shocking as they all are in the same linguistic family and it is thought CHinese (huaxia tribes) came into the Yellow River valley from the North West...
-Preston Sturges 1942 film, The Palm Beach Story.
http://southeastasia...olicyblogs.com/
龙马 Rising!
#4
Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:56 AM
#5
Posted 20 April 2009 - 07:20 PM
The video says that the ancestors of the Dong Yi (Shandong aboriginals) and Bai Yue (Southern China aboriginals) are the O1 group that originated from Guangdong along time ago, but migrated into eastern china. They later got absorbed by Northern and Western Asian groups, and today O1 is relatively rare haplogroup, which only exists in coastal regions (with more than 20% of O1) of Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Taiwan. So is the video saying that Bai Yue blood is only retained in those 3 provinces, which in guangdong and fujian it is gone ?
I suggest you refrain from your persistent comments that the cantonese or taishanese have ZERO bai yue blood and imply that the taishanese (which you belong to) are purer han and more superior than the rest of the south chinese.
Or that ridiculous assumption that all bai yue were chased out to vietnam when China conquered Guangdong.
Edited by xng, 20 April 2009 - 07:26 PM.
#6
Posted 20 April 2009 - 07:25 PM
This is not shocking as they all are in the same linguistic family and it is thought CHinese (huaxia tribes) came into the Yellow River valley from the North West...
There are theories that the han chinese and tibetans originated from the kunlun mountains 7000 years ago. And that's why they fall in the same language family.
#7
Posted 20 April 2009 - 10:10 PM
#8
Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:06 PM
I suggest you refrain from your persistent comments that the cantonese or taishanese have ZERO bai yue blood and imply that the taishanese (which you belong to) are purer han and more superior than the rest of the south chinese.
Or that ridiculous assumption that all bai yue were chased out to vietnam when China conquered Guangdong.
no i didn't mean that >.< I mean.. the video says those statistics (that O1 belongs to the Bai Yue and that the only provinces that currently have the 20%+ O1 blood is those 3 provinces of Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Taiwan).. and i think it's weird, because i think Guangdong and Fujian both do have some Bai Yue blood too.
Edited by Andy Lau, 20 April 2009 - 11:07 PM.
#9
Posted 21 April 2009 - 01:15 AM
If I remember correctly, humans have diverged only around 141000 years ago, and the O gene is only about 30000 years old (not 3 Million).
The ordering of some things are also wrong, and I think those can be traced when you make a graph of how they diverged.
If you read it more carefully, it doesn't say that it only exists in these 3 provinces.So is the video saying that Bai Yue blood is only retained in those 3 provinces, which in guangdong and fujian it is gone ?
It says that, only in those 3 provinces the frequency is >20%, i.e. in other provinces they are rarer, <20%.
And then, we actually should cast doubt if they are really the "BaiYue". The video says that the Tais has mostly O2.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - JFK
#10
Posted 21 April 2009 - 06:37 AM
This video author is well known racist from Youtube, the vid is worthless.
역사를 왜곡하는 민족은 반드시 멸망한다.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











