Guangxi's Cantonese speakers
#1
Posted 15 March 2011 - 11:42 AM
And, what Cantonese dialect do they speak? Standard Guangzhou or Taishanese? Cheap Gucci ShoesThere are also Mandarin speakers in the north of Guangxi. Were they in Guangxi before or after the Cantonese speakers arrived?
#2
Posted 01 April 2011 - 08:41 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinghua
Edited by xng, 01 April 2011 - 08:41 PM.
#3
Posted 02 April 2011 - 12:24 AM
But Guangxi has a branch of Cantonese largely endemic to the region called 桂南片 (not so sure how exactly it is close to the rest of Yue Chinese). Any Cantonese dialect that is not of this branch, such as 粵海片 (Guangzhou Cantonese) and 四邑片 (Taishanese) are 'foreign' branches of Cantonese spoken in Guangxi and is likely to be spoken by migrants or descendants of migrants from Guangdong.
Mandarin speakers moved to Northern Guangxi during the Ming and Qing periods, which is why you see a population boom of SW Mandarin speakers in Southwestern China for the large part except for some migrant enclaves such as Wu speakers and Gan speakers in Guizhou or Hakka speakers in Sichuan, for example. I would supposed that Yue and Ping speakers have been in Guangxi for quite a while, before the settlement of Mandarin-speakers, had their own branches of Yue. 桂南片 and Pinghua have been in Guangxi the longest, followed by Mandarin speakers, Taishanese speakers and Guangzhou Cantonese speakers right around the same time period.
Edited by bloodmerchant, 02 April 2011 - 12:30 AM.
─伍子胥 《知化》,《呂氏春秋》
#4
Posted 02 April 2011 - 10:16 AM
Wuzhou and Nanning Baihua are close to Guangzhou, highly intelligible. So they should be late migrants (Ming, Qing) from Guangdong.
(now I am basing on "中国语言地图集")
There are also ones classified as Yong-Xun, very similar to Cantonese, after one gets used to the accent (that means, using ears only instead of a systematic comparison) it's basically intelligible.
Qin-lian is most likely not a valid grouping (geographically-oriented), some having little changes and some having big changes compared to Cantonese. Qinzhou is just like different accent, while Hepu is almost like a different language.
The ones classified as "Goulou" are very different. Yulin has the most peculiar changes (e.g. siang -> slaa, *kiau -> tʃau instead of kau), not really intelligible even after a few repetitions. After "adjusting for accents", Rongxian a bit better, but not too intelligible either, and Tengxian maybe half.
Note that Nanning Pinghua and Nanning Baihua are different tongues. I read somewhere about Nanning Pinghua, and saw a significant number of "un-Cantonese" vocabularies in simple expressions (though Nanning Baihua basically agrees with Cantonese).
South Pinghua still sounds somewhat close to Cantonese, maybe only slightly less intelligible than Yulin.
North Pinghua are very different from those, and appears more closely related to "Xiangnan Tuhua" or "Yuebei Tuhua", classified as Guangxi Pinghua maybe only because of the name and province.
Edited by qrasy, 02 April 2011 - 10:17 AM.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - JFK
#5
Posted 02 April 2011 - 10:51 PM
http://www.ispeakmin...ad.php?tid=5646
Is Guilin Hokkien this close to Zhangzhou Hokkien? This may seem to be the case as 門 is pronounced as 'muoi' rather than 'mng'.
http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=1013766429
It seems that Min speakers are scattered all across Guangxi, in small enclaves.
http://ndltd.ncl.edu...earchmode=basic
Apparently, in Taiwan, some scholars think that Guangxi Min Nan is conservative compared to other Min Nan dialects.
─伍子胥 《知化》,《呂氏春秋》
#6
Posted 02 April 2011 - 11:18 PM
#7
Posted 03 April 2011 - 12:02 AM
It's really interesting how there are so many Minnan speakers all over Guangdong(northern =Chaozhou and southern tips=Zhanjiang) and Guangxi. Even Hainan's Han majority come from the minnan speaking group. I wonder if Minnan speakers were actually the first Han Chinese that settled in Guangdong, before the Cantonese speaking groups.. because minnan seems to be more older than Cantonese, while cantonese is younger than minnan but older than mandarin: Minnan > Cantonese > Mandarin.
Min Nan speakers are the most widespread of any Chinese language, from as north as Jiangsu (somewhere around Yixing) to as southwest as Chongqing, Guangxi and of course Hainan. But I believe most Min Nan speakers in Yixing and Huzhou and other places to the north of Wenzhou actually came from Wenzhou, as many of them also happened to speak Wenzhou dialect. They came from Southern Zhejiang to northern Zhejiang and southern Jiangsu during the late 19th century. Most local residents, of course, speak Wu Chinese. I heard Wu speakers are found within a town in Xinjiang and another town in Guizhou, but I assume they came after the 20th century, as many hardly left their homeland prior to that area.
http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=867398070
It's more accurate to say that the early ancestor of Min split from Chinese, then the early ancestor of Cantonese split from Late Middle Chinese or Qin Chinese, which ever theory you subscribe to, whether it'd be OC/MC theory or 'Warring States' theory. To say something like 'Cantonese language is the ancestor of Mandarin language' is much like saying that 'monkeys and gorillas are the ancestors of humans', which they are not.
─伍子胥 《知化》,《呂氏春秋》
#8
Posted 03 April 2011 - 12:25 AM
I don't know but I don't think you can say Minnan speakers are the 1st Han Chinese to settle in Guangdong ? Here was the land of Bai Yue.
It seems that Minnan speakers first landed on current Teochew grounds during the Song Dynasty.
And...What do you mean by "Han Chinese" ? Purely people from Han Dynasty ? Or before that ? As far as I heard of, some people from Qin Dynasty resettled in the South too last time.
Edited by mrclub, 03 April 2011 - 12:37 AM.
#9
Posted 03 April 2011 - 09:11 AM
To Mrclub: By Han Chinese = i meant the people who migrated from Central Plains of China into other areas of China (and of course there were some assimilation of locals).
#10
Posted 03 April 2011 - 09:57 AM
I guess you may assume that. But then, before those migrations, there were already some Sinitic Pinghua.So I assume that the majority of the population were ethnic Zhuang on the onset of mass migrations from Guangdong and other parts of Southwestern China during Ming dynasty?
Of course, they are in decline among Chinese after the migrations from Guangdong and other parts of SW China.
While I forgot to bookmark where I saw it, the Minnan in Guangxi was descended from the Minnan in Yunan 鬱南 of Guangdong. There's a dialect island in Liantan 連灘I did hear that there is a small minority of Min Nan speakers in Guangxi.
http://www.ispeakmin...ad.php?tid=5646
Is Guilin Hokkien this close to Zhangzhou Hokkien? This may seem to be the case as 門 is pronounced as 'muoi' rather than 'mng'.
I don't know if "muoi" by itself can prove that it's closer to Zhangzhou, as Leizhou and Hainan (also in SW Guangdong) apparently have "ui" for that rhyme, too.
It's just a few features that are more preservative. Other parts are presumably heavily influenced by SW Mandarin and Yue dialects, and overall I would think that those islands didn't preserve Minnan features very well.http://ndltd.ncl.edu...earchmode=basic
Apparently, in Taiwan, some scholars think that Guangxi Min Nan is conservative compared to other Min Nan dialects.
It's vague as it depends on what you are really thinking when you mention "Oldness".because minnan seems to be more older than Cantonese, while cantonese is younger than minnan but older than mandarin: Minnan > Cantonese > Mandarin.
Does it mean
1. after excluding a few most recent changes, to claim that the remaining features are all preservative
2. to take the whole branch instead of the any representative dialect and see that the most common features are preservative.
3. to trace its ancestors until the common ancestor meet with another branch (i.e. historical split with all other branches)
or what?
You seem to have forgotten the Mandarin branch, from Northern tip of Heilongjiang to Southern tip of Yunnan. (those are no less closely related than Hainan is to Quanzhou)Min Nan speakers are the most widespread of any Chinese language, from as north as Jiangsu (somewhere around Yixing) to as southwest as Chongqing, Guangxi and of course Hainan.
I think the first Sinitic speakers in Guangdong spoke an extinct branch of Sinitic, and (keeping the possibility that it's replaced a few times by another Sinitic branch which later went extinct) much later replaced by Yue and Hakka.I don't know but I don't think you can say Minnan speakers are the 1st Han Chinese to settle in Guangdong ? Here was the land of Bai Yue.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - JFK
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











