Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Sima Yan's harem


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 f0ma

f0ma

    Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)

  • Super Moderator
  • 276 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Asian History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Sino-Japanese relations

Posted 25 May 2012 - 05:42 AM

Hello all, this is my first post, but I've been lurking here for as long as I can remember. I was just hoping maybe someone could help me clarify something. I've been researching the Jin Dynasty and I've encountered one particular controversy over the number of concubine's in Sima Yan's harem. Sun Hao is often seen as corrupting Sima Yan and causing his fall from grace in 280CE, after he brought with him to the capital his personal harem of 5,000 concubines. I've read other sources, however, which claim Sima Yan's own harem consisted of 10,000 concubines - before or after, however, I'm not certain, but I presumed before. It seems an excessive number, however, so I'm not certain if I trust it. I don't really believe Sima Yan could be corrupted solely by the addition of Sun Hao's concubines (I think he just saw his work as complete after uniting the country, which is why he gave himself up to a life of luxury) and if he already had such a large harem, it would go some way to shaping a much more objective argument - instead of just assigning all the blame to Sun Hao. So, in short, can anyone confirm that Sima Yan did in fact already have such a large harem before the conquest of Wu?

#2 Sima2013

Sima2013

    County Magistrate (Xianling 县令)

  • CHF Beginner
  • 5 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA
  • Interests:music, marching bands, gospel, crochet, video games, programming, Final Fantasy Series
  • Languages spoken:english, some spanish
  • Ethnic Groups or Race:why does it even matter?
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    none

Posted 07 August 2012 - 05:15 PM

I see it's been a while since you've posted this question but I've always wondered if Sima Yan really had that many concubines, the numbers do seem too large... I'm not an expert, but maybe I can find some info.

#3 f0ma

f0ma

    Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)

  • Super Moderator
  • 276 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Asian History
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Sino-Japanese relations

Posted 08 August 2012 - 02:58 AM

I think the number is too high also. I still don't have a definitive answer yet, but I believe i) the 10,000 concubines was a mistranslation in the book I read (a very dated western text) and ii) the original 5,000 concubines in and of themselves were probably historiographic hyperbole. I'd be grateful if you could dig anything else up on the subject though.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users