Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Making the Triple-bow Siege Crossbow


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#46 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 09 June 2005 - 02:01 AM

Hehehe ok thanks. It's also one big learning process for me too.

BTW, my test of max range with my model this weekend isn't going to be accurate since I'm not using composite bows similar to what a real ChuangZiNu would use.

Assuming a perfectly scalable equivalent javelin represented by a short bamboo stick would represent a direct proportional reduction in projectile weight and flight characteristics, we are left with only the dimensions of the ChuangZiNu itself.

Here's my preliminary calculations.

Estimation of overall length of a life sized ChuangZiNu (bow tip to winch) = 4m

Overall length of my model ChuangZiNu = 0.17m

So, to (inaccurately) scale a max range of 1000m with the real ChuangziNu, we need to achieve a max range with the model of approximately 170/4000 x 1000 = 42.5 metres

I seriously doubt I can reach that kind of range. Maybe if I change the bows to steel I may. ;)

I'll try anyway.

#47 mk_cn

mk_cn

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Shanghai

Posted 09 June 2005 - 04:29 AM

hope it can reach 20m :unsure:

#48 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 12 June 2005 - 11:36 PM

No good. The maximum I could get with 45 degree arc was 9-11m which would translate to just about 210-260m which is only typical Roman Ballista ranges. Its probably due to the bows not being of proper material. Let me sleep on this and see how I can make better bows and then I'll do a retrial to see if I can get at least your stated 20m range.

#49 mk_cn

mk_cn

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Shanghai

Posted 13 June 2005 - 10:15 PM

No good.  The maximum I could get with 45 degree arc was 9-11m which would translate to just about 210-260m which is only typical Roman Ballista ranges.  Its probably due to the bows not being of proper material.  Let me sleep on this and see how I can make better bows and then I'll do a retrial to see if I can get at least your stated 20m range.

View Post

thank your for your effort, maybe material is the key. :unsure:
do you think the ancient Chinese crafts or processes have been lost for many years, so maybe we cannot restore a crossbow as powerful as before. :(

#50 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 14 June 2005 - 02:10 AM

Yeah, material is the key. I don't have the bows done well enough or properly enough. Chinese traditional bows are composite bows in three primary materials, the tensile sinew, central core bamboo and wood in the compression face. There is one traditional bow maker left in China, in Beijing. I'm quite sure he could still make large enough bows in the traditional way to mount onto a Chuangzi to make the San Gong Chuang Zi Nu!

I intend to purchase one of these traditional bows. Possibly in my next trip to Beijing I'll pick up one.

#51 mk_cn

mk_cn

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Shanghai

Posted 22 June 2005 - 04:16 AM

a rich man ^_^

#52 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 22 June 2005 - 09:58 PM

a rich man ^_^

View Post

Nah, just one with a passion. :lol:

BTW, Kenneth is back from his trip to Xian. He has a lot of new info on the Siege Crossbow. According to him, he was told that Song dynasty acruballistas had ranges up to almost 2km! I find this a little hard to believe but there has apparently been a test done on excavated tomb acruballistas (reconstructed I assume) which reached ranges of 900m. I'm still trying to verify this. Hopefully I can find the source and quote details later.

#53 mk_cn

mk_cn

    Prefect (Taishou 太守)

  • Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Shanghai

Posted 28 June 2005 - 04:33 AM

Nah, just one with a passion.  :lol:

BTW, Kenneth is back from his trip to Xian.  He has a lot of new info on the Siege Crossbow.  According to him, he was told that Song dynasty acruballistas had ranges up to almost 2km!  I find this a little hard to believe but there has apparently been a test done on excavated tomb acruballistas (reconstructed I assume) which reached ranges of 900m.  I'm still trying to verify this.  Hopefully I can find the source and quote details later.

View Post

whoops, 2km... :o, i will try to ask some friends from Xian to verify if there was a test before. :lol:

#54 Liang Jieming

Liang Jieming

    Ingénieur chinois de siège

  • CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • 7,251 posts
  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...
  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 28 June 2005 - 05:28 AM

Yeah but I haven't found the references to verify the 2km distance yet though. Hopefully Kenneth settles down and starts posting his comments on this soon. ;)

#55 General_Zhaoyun

General_Zhaoyun

    Grand Valiant General of Imperial Han Army

  • Admin
  • 12,048 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore (Taiwanese/Singapore Permanent Resident)
  • Interests:Chinese History, Chinese Philosophy and Religion, Chinese languages, Minnan/Taiwanese language, Classical Chinese, General Chinese Culture
  • Languages spoken:Mandarin, Taiwanese (Hokkien), English, German, Singlish
  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Taiwanese Hoklo)
  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture
  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Language, History and Culture

Posted 15 January 2008 - 10:03 PM

Yeah but I haven't found the references to verify the 2km distance yet though. Hopefully Kenneth settles down and starts posting his comments on this soon. ;)


Have you already solved the '2km distance' mystery?
Posted ImagePosted Image

"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮

One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang

#56 Guest_Noob_*

Guest_Noob_*
  • Guest

Posted 16 January 2008 - 05:09 AM

Materials behave differently at different scales. Case in point, it is physically impossible to scale an ant up to car size




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users