Map of Ancient China with cities - 3 kingdoms era
Posted 14 June 2004 - 01:41 AM
Visit my map: http://pub16.bravene...rnum=1312371940
Send your regards to email@example.com
Posted 14 June 2004 - 02:53 AM
"夫君子之行：靜以修身，儉以養德；非淡泊無以明志，非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
Posted 14 June 2004 - 05:04 AM
Posted 14 June 2004 - 06:00 AM
Posted 14 June 2004 - 06:53 AM
Also it shows the lands of the so called "barbarians"
Posted 16 June 2004 - 08:24 AM
Dear Yun, the map (Map of RTK) had no purpose neither its has a goal, all of its cities had wrongly seated, the map are fairly useful, there are also numerous inaccuracies and anachronistic of Map of RTK cities which I just found out.
The two maps serve different purposes: the first map shows all the cities, while Yimanrongdi's map shows the physical terrain, and the extent of the Chinese empire at the time and its position in relation to surrounding peoples. That's why there are hardly any cities indicated on that map other than the political capitals.
Posted 11 July 2004 - 09:06 AM
Posted 11 July 2004 - 09:12 AM
Posted 26 April 2005 - 02:41 PM
Posted 26 April 2005 - 07:52 PM
Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:09 PM
Posted 27 April 2005 - 12:46 AM
Nope, Sichuan belonged to the giant pandas. And Guangdong belonged to the dolphins.
Oh no, another Pan-Yue nationalist. nguoiVietchanhtong, what evidence do you have that the Yue were in Sichuan?
Posted 12 September 2005 - 11:05 PM
Posted 14 May 2007 - 08:58 AM
Posted 15 May 2007 - 12:34 PM
Wu did do that by sending an army to North Vietnam and occupying it, but there was quite a number of uprising. Wei and Shu were too busy fighting each other.
i was thinking at tat time why they dun conquer other lands instead of fighting each other.. lol if they had done tat ... then china might be the biggest country in this world haha this is my point of view
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users