China History Forum, Chinese History Forum: Why is chinese writing from right to left? - China History Forum, Chinese History Forum

Jump to content

Loading

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Why is chinese writing from right to left? Traditional chinese writing format Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is online   General_Zhaoyun 

  • Grand Valiant General of Imperial Han Army
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 11,597
  • Joined: 24-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore (Taiwanese/Singapore Permanent Resident)

  • Interests:Chinese History, Chinese Philosophy and Religion, Chinese languages, Minnan/Taiwanese language, Classical Chinese, General Chinese Culture

  • Languages spoken:Mandarin, Taiwanese (Hokkien), English, German, Singlish

  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Taiwanese Hoklo)

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Language, History and Culture

Posted 23 June 2006 - 01:53 AM

In traditional chinese writing format, you will start by writing from right to left and from top to bottom, column by column... (see below). This is also the sequence on how to read chinese in traditional format.

Posted Image

This traditonal format is still preserved today in Taiwan, where books were published in this style. PRC format are usually using modern format from left to right, row by row, as a result of influence from the west.

Why is the traditional chinese writing from right to left?

I'm not too sure about its historical origin, but my chinese linguistic teacher had once explained that it could be due to the way how the inscription was done on the oracle bone of Shang dynasty (i.e. the Jiaguwen 甲骨文). The Jiaguwen (oracle inscription) of Shang dynasty was the earliest chinese writing found in China and at that time, inscriptions were carved using knife onto a turtle shell or bone. There wasn't any 'pen' at that time, thus to inscribe the words, you would have to hold the turtle shell using the left hand and use your right hand to hold a knife and inscribe the writing onto the turtle shell.

Now, it would naturally be more convenient and easier (handy) to inscribe the writing from right to left (assuming you're right-handed and bearing in mind that you need a certain force to use a knife to inscribe the characters on the turtle shell).

Posted Image
Oracle Bone Inscription of Shang dynasty (Jiaguwen)


I'm not too sure whether this kind of explanation is valid. Why do you think the traditional chinese writing is from right to left, and not from left to right? Any comments and explanation is appreciated.
Posted ImagePosted Image

"夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮

One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. -
Zhugeliang
0

#2 User is offline   Liang Jieming 

  • Ingénieur chinois de siège
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 7,251
  • Joined: 03-September 04

  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...

  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 23 June 2006 - 01:59 AM

What I understand is that the European left to right is due to scribes using ink which needs time to dry. Most scribes being right-handed would hence be writing towards the right side and so won't have the sleeve rub against the undried ink.

The Chinese had established the right to left system well before the invention of ink so it must be because of something inherent in carving/chipping stone/bamboo that "fixed" it right to left.
0

#3 User is offline   snowybeagle 

  • Sentinel of the Southern Star (鎮南星)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 5,197
  • Joined: 09-June 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 23 June 2006 - 02:06 AM

I believe the explanation related to characters originally being carved rather than written would be accurate.

This is also the observation of my ex-neighbour from Israel. The convention applies not only to Chinese writings, but to most writings whose origins were based on carvings, including traditional Arabic and Hebrew.

See section on Directionality in http://en.wikipedia....Writing_systems
0

#4 User is offline   lanjingling 

  • Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 04-December 05

  • Location:Bangkok

Posted 23 June 2006 - 07:11 AM

But why do many radicals are at the left of the character , & not at the right , when the writing is from right to left ?
0

#5 User is offline   fcharton 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 3,010
  • Joined: 12-September 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Nemours and Paris

  • Interests:Contemporary poetry, these days...

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    PreQin, Classical chinese

Posted 23 June 2006 - 07:51 AM

View Postlanjingling, on Jun 23 2006, 02:11 PM, said:

But why do many radicals are at the left of the character , & not at the right , when the writing is from right to left ?


In fact, at the character level, the writing is pretty much left to write (you usually write the left part before the right part, horizontal strokes are written from left to right...).

So, when you look closely :
- at the character level, it is globally left to right (and top to bottom)
- at the "line level", it is vertical (ie chinese write in columns whereas most other languages write in lines)
- at the "top level" it is right to left (just as western languages are written from top to bottom)

Of course, when you read a book, the top level is the most visible, because it determines the order in which the pages are read, but in my opinion, the hallmark of chinese writing is "top to bottom", and the comparisons with arabic and hebrews are a bit far fetched...

Francois

This post has been edited by fcharton: 23 June 2006 - 07:52 AM

0

#6 User is offline   snowybeagle 

  • Sentinel of the Southern Star (鎮南星)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 5,197
  • Joined: 09-June 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 23 June 2006 - 08:04 AM

View Postfcharton, on Jun 23 2006, 08:51 PM, said:

but in my opinion, the hallmark of chinese writing is "top to bottom", and the comparisons with arabic and hebrews are a bit far fetched...

Not at all.

First, right to left origins is because of how one carves before the brush/pen was invented.

Next, the top to bottom origins is because of bamboo scrolls, which no other culture seemed to use.

Middle Eastern societies had scrolls, but those were papyrus etc., not bamboo.

Anyone is welcomed to try an experiment - make a scroll, a long one, of bamboo or wooden strips.
See which is more comfortable - lay the scroll sideways or up-down for writing.

IMHO, our panoramic view tends towards landscape rather than portrait.

Nonetheless, after paper and book binding is invented, portrait shape is found to be easier to handle rather than landscape.
0

#7 User is offline   fcharton 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 3,010
  • Joined: 12-September 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Nemours and Paris

  • Interests:Contemporary poetry, these days...

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    PreQin, Classical chinese

Posted 23 June 2006 - 08:27 AM

View Postsnowybeagle, on Jun 23 2006, 03:04 PM, said:

First, right to left origins is because of how one carves before the brush/pen was invented.

Next, the top to bottom origins is because of bamboo scrolls, which no other culture seemed to use.


But, aren't the Jiaguwen older than bamboo scrolls, and weren't they written from top to bottom? My impression is that the top to bottom order comes from the shape of the turtle carapaces, people would naturally tend to hold them in the "correct direction", and one can write longer sentences in the vertical direction than in the horizontal direction. And a text with a few long lines is easier to read than one with many short lines...

I must say I am unconvinced about the carving explanation: in the west, many ancient carvings are "boustrophedonic" (one line right to left, the next one left to right, etc...) which shows that there is no "privileged" direction for writing when carving.

Francois
0

#8 User is offline   qrasy 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 4,046
  • Joined: 03-April 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Hong Kong

  • Interests:Physics, Chemistry, Maths, Biology, Languages, Ethnicity, History, etc.

  • Languages spoken:English, Indonesian, Mandarin Chinese, (certain extent of) Cantonese

  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Southeastern)

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Other Interests

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Linguistics

Posted 23 June 2006 - 08:35 AM

View Postfcharton, on Jun 23 2006, 08:51 PM, said:

In fact, at the character level, the writing is pretty much left to write (you usually write the left part before the right part, horizontal strokes are written from left to right...).
Why is that the line-alignment direction reverse of general character writing order? And when it's on labelling pavilions, there is only one character per column, so it's reversed.

View Postfcharton, on Jun 23 2006, 09:27 PM, said:

I must say I am unconvinced about the carving explanation: in the west, many ancient carvings are "boustrophedonic" (one line right to left, the next one left to right, etc...) which shows that there is no "privileged" direction for writing when carving.


If I recall correctly, Europeans once used horizontal scrolls and boustropedon forced them to unwind and rewind again and again?

This post has been edited by qrasy: 23 June 2006 - 08:38 AM

It's OK to make mistakes. But please mind the possibility that your examples might not be representative.
0

#9 User is offline   oliverarodriguez 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 09-February 06

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Matanzas, Cuba

  • Interests:Everything about China.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Art of War

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Master in Business Administration/Master in Touristical Management/Choy Gar Kuen instructor

Posted 23 June 2006 - 03:24 PM

Well I have seen old hand writing documents from chinese people from XIX century where they write in colums from right to left, from up to down, but other documents where they write from down to up. I asked about it to an old man and he explained to me that ancient chineses used to do it that way because it was "a sign of wisdom" he says that the texts that read in both ways had sense and diferent intepretation were very appretiated. Have anyone heard anything like this??????
"Once Choy always Choy"
http://www.choykakungfucuba.110mb.com
0

#10 User is offline   KaLing 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 128
  • Joined: 09-December 05

  • Gender:Female

  • Languages spoken:Cantonese, English

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Museum Studies

Posted 12 July 2006 - 02:49 AM

It's a bit relavant to this topic...I've always wondered why in China, it is "East, South, West, North". Why is the East/right side more "respected" than the West/left?
Posted Image
0

#11 User is offline   Liang Jieming 

  • Ingénieur chinois de siège
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 7,251
  • Joined: 03-September 04

  • Location:in the distant past, changing your future...

  • Interests:Ancient History with emphasis on the sciences, technological and engineering achievements and milestones. Areas of interest include Mesopotamian, Chinese, Roman, English and Central American history.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Ancient Chinese Arsenals

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Ancient Siege Weaponry

Posted 12 July 2006 - 02:50 AM

My own take on this, the traditional threats to China almost always came from the north and west.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Visitors have visited CHF