China History Forum, Chinese History Forum: Debate on the Manchu-Qing Regime - China History Forum, Chinese History Forum

Jump to content

  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Debate on the Manchu-Qing Regime Is ban on inter-marriage considered racism? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Subotai 

  • Commissioner (Shi Chijie 使持节)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 17-August 05

Posted 28 August 2006 - 05:23 AM

View Post赵丰年, on Aug 26 2006, 11:28 AM, said:

However, the imerial family is a mixer of Manchu and Mongols. In the Qing dynasty the imperial family only married with Manchu and Mongols, but never marry with Han, in order to keep the purity of their super blood. So people in the above pictures are not alwyas like "pure" original Manchu although they have no blood from the Han ethnic group. I think it is the same applied for the noble family in the Manchu regime.

Correct me if im wrong, isnt that a kind of racism towards the Han ethnic people?
0

#2 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 28 August 2006 - 06:36 AM

View PostSubotai, on Aug 28 2006, 04:23 AM, said:

Correct me if im wrong, isnt that a kind of racism towards the Han ethnic people?

Considering ethnic genocide of at least tens of millions Han Chinese, (more than 800,000 in a single city), this is really a minor side of their racism. In Qing dynasty, the Manchu rulers publically claimed all Han-Chinese were their slaves.

This post has been edited by 赵丰年: 28 August 2006 - 06:44 AM

Posted Image
0

#3 Guest_RICECAKE_*

  • Group: Guest

Posted 28 August 2006 - 06:55 AM

Racism was two-way traffic in those days,Han Chinese generally regarded Nomadic hordes as " barbaric " and wouldn't comsidered marriage with them either.

Nurhaci had lifetime obsessed wavering hatred through out his reign toward Han Chinese,who he blamed the death of his father and grandfather executed by Ming Court.

His son Qing Tai-Zhu implemented some changes to minimized ethnic conflicts/institutionalized bigotry toward ethnic Han as soon as he took the helm.

Replaying victimhood through history and self-victimization provenly damaged self-esteem among modern day Chinese.

Manchu Court RIGHTLY imposed " pigtail " on conquered population for it was their hair-wear not what some idiotic Chinese propagated as racism against ethnic Hans or brainwashed Hans forgetting their NON-Manchu roots.

This post has been edited by RICECAKE: 28 August 2006 - 07:04 AM


#4 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 28 August 2006 - 03:35 PM

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 28 2006, 05:55 AM, said:

Racism was two-way traffic in those days,Han Chinese generally regarded Nomadic hordes as " barbaric " and wouldn't comsidered marriage with them either.


Your definition of racism must be very different from some others. To my knowledge, racism is to despice certain group of people because of their blood. Han Chinese called the nomadic hordes because their regular behavior of constant and endless murding, plundering other civilized area and kidnaping and raping millions of women and also evalued these kinds behavior as glory. Records from different countries are consistent in their crimes, such as riper open pregnent women to kill the unborn baby, raping women in front of the huasbands and sons than killing the latter in front of women. In the record about what the Manchu army did in YangZhou city, when the Manchus sodliers saw women holding small baby, the first thing they did is to throw the small baby to the ground to death, they forced the mother to step on the brains liquid of their own baby and rape them in front of the childrend's dead body. I have problem to understand why Han Chinese victims are not allowed to regard this group criminals as barbarian with heart of animals, and if they did not obey this prohibation, they are racists. There are also other country where people do not consider to marry criminals before they changed their value system. But in the most part of world, this kind of despising are usually not sorted as racism, because it is not despice a certain group of people according to their blood, but only according to their behaviors.

Most Chinese, as many other people in this world, believe it is possible for different group of people live together in peace and hamony. They are against racism and chauvinism because it is not helpful to live paecfully. But there are other kind of people in this world, the Nurhach family and their supporters for example, who think enslaving others is the only way they can live better, They changed definition for racism, if any Chinese are reluctant to be their slaves, it is racism or "Han-Chauvinsm". They are against "racism" not for live peacfully with others, but to justify their enslaving action against Chinese. I guess you are one of them, am I wrong?

Unlike the Manchu-Qing regime, Han Chinese did not organize any action to plunder or enslave Jurgens and they just dislike the other side murdering and plundering them. In any part of this earth, it is a very natural reactions from the victims. You do not think the innocent Han victms and their descendants deserve any human right of blaming the murder because you are a racist toward Han Chinese youself.

Quote

Nurhaci had lifetime obsessed wavering hatred through out his reign toward Han Chinese,who he blamed the death of his father and grandfather executed by Ming Court.
This is simply a lie. Nurhaci's grandfather and and father were not executed by the Ming Court. They were the officers of Ming govement. When they tried to pursuade some Jurgen rebeling force to surrender, the Ming army attacked the rebelling force and kill them accidently. Nurhaci had no problem to accept apology with rich and generous commpensation and serve in the Ming court to accept weapon and wealth from Ming court, until he found he can plunder Han-Chinese area without problem. His so called hatred is just an excuse to attract others to plunder China. Without these so called hatres, these kind of criminals would alway do the same. Korean has not kill any of his family member but they never spare any korean when they raid them. In a single military action, they kidnap 20,000 korean women. They idid those kind of crimes not because korean or Han-Chinese oppress them, but becasue they did not produce food and textile themself, and they found killing plundering Han and Koreans was the quickest way to become rich.

Quote

His son Qing Tai-Zhu implemented some changes to minimized ethnic conflicts/institutionalized bigotry toward ethnic Han as soon as he took the helm.

The way they "minimized ethnic conflicts/institutionalized bigotry toward ethnic Han" is to raiding Han Chinese and Korean area, killing millions of innocent Han-Chinese. When you try to praise this kind of murder, you certainly think the human life of those victims worth nothing, right?

Quote

Replaying victimhood through history and self-victimization provenly damaged self-esteem among modern day Chinese.
The jews victims can not expcet any esteem and respect from Nazi murders.and supporters. Han-Chinese can not seek any esteem from the manchu-qing murders and their supporters. This is simply because Nazi and Manchu-Qing supporters never consider human life of their victims worth anything.

With thinking of Han Chinese deserve nothing but only being slave of the Manchu regime, no matter what chinese do, how can you give any esteem to Chinese anyway? Stoping blaming the murder in order to get esteem from you does sound very feasible, right? At least for me, it is far more important for Chinese to avoid being harmed by a malicious group or organization than paying great effort for getting esteem from them.

by the way, we did not replay any victimhood through history. we were willing to live with the dessident of the murders with equal right. We already forive the and amlost forget the crimes in the history until we were reminded by this kind of picture, TV program and movie almost every week played in China, in which they publiclally glorify the murders and insult the victims and their descendants.

Posted Image

I think it is really stupid to make this kind of picture, because the manchu group in history get their text by plundering Han Chinese. and they were not so easy to get such expensive silk made clothes. It is even more stupid that, despite their own ancesstors including the women victims who were kidnapped and rapred by the murders, they still fell so pround about the crimes the criminal did. They despice Han Chinese by completely forgotten it was Han Chinese who produce and provide all the nesssarry resouce to them during the whole Qing period. Even more, they have forgotten that Han Chinese generously forgave that they have evil ancesstors who committed terrible crimes like animals, and have willing to live with them peacefully with equal right. With all these mercy, they are still malicous to Han Chinese and try all the way to insult and hurt them. They even publically called them idoit, claim there is nothing wrong to kill tens of millions Chinese after they did not receive any retaliation from the latter.

Quote

Manchu Court RIGHTLY imposed " pigtail " on conquered population for it was their hair-wear not what some idiotic Chinese propagated as racism against ethnic Hans or brainwashed Hans forgetting their NON-Manchu roots.


Well, different people have different standard about right or wrong.; Nazi supporter think Hilter rightly impose the ethinic cleaning towards the Jew victims, because they did not care about human life the millions jew victims, exactly as you did not care about the human life of the tens of millions Han Chinese who were murdered by the Manchu court.

You think the personal favorit habbits of the Manchu rulers is more important than the human life millions of the Chinese who did not want to wear in the same way with them, so you think there is nothing wrong to kill the latter. I guess if you have the opportunity, you will kill us like that again, because you never think we are worth anything, right? Aparently, you evalue one group of people higher than Han Chinese, isn't this a typical racisms?

When people in this world want to live peacefully together, they think it is right that innocent people should not be killed. However, there are other types of human being in this world, their only interests are to enslaving others. They are always reluctant to produce and construct. Any accient inventions, technology such as silk, tea, china or art have nothing to do with the Jurgen/Manchu regime. They were so busy to pluder and killing others so that they even have not have their own written system without other's help. In the letter Huang taiji to the Ming court, he threaten to raid if Ming do not give them enough food and textile.

I guess they must think all Han Chinese are idoits and easy to be enslaved again. If one day, Han chinese finally find how smart this group, I am not sure the results is what they really want to get. Might be I am wrong, we will see.

This post has been edited by 赵丰年: 28 August 2006 - 04:47 PM

Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Juchechosunmanse 

  • Grand Mentor (Taishi 太师)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 486
  • Joined: 20-May 05

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Asian History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Korean history

Posted 28 August 2006 - 07:28 PM

Quote

So people in the above pictures are not alwyas like "pure" original Manchu although they have no blood from the Han ethnic group. I think it is the same applied for the noble family in the Manchu regime.


No Han blood? How about the Han Bannermen?
Posted Image

위대한 조선민주주의인민공화국만세! 일심딘결, 강성대국
위대한 령도자 김정일동지께 끝없이 충직한 근위대, 결사대가 되자!
0

#6 Guest_RICECAKE_*

  • Group: Guest

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:08 PM

View Post赵丰年, on Aug 28 2006, 03:35 PM, said:

I guess they must think all Han Chinese are idiots and easy to be enslaved again.


Modern day Chinese are enslaved by past history victimhood propagated by Chinese mass media outlets and some individuals over-exaggerately recyle victimization c**p.

The big question is how Chinese can leap from this grave that buried their backward live senseless souls.

This post has been edited by RICECAKE: 29 August 2006 - 04:41 AM


#7 User is offline   lifezard 

  • Supreme Censor (Yushi Dafu 御史大夫)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 1,125
  • Joined: 29-December 05

  • Location:@?

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:13 PM

View PostJuchechosunmanse, on Aug 29 2006, 08:28 AM, said:

No Han blood? How about the Han Bannermen?


i think no Han Bannerwomen actually became the Emperor s official wife (i.e. Empress (west or east), but then, the emperor was free to take in concubines and quite a number were actually Han
plain amateur, here to make mistakes, make a fool of ownself, and hopefully learn something in the process
0

#8 User is offline   redstick426 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 01-May 06

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 29 August 2006 - 03:10 AM

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 28 2006, 04:55 AM, said:

Manchu Court RIGHTLY imposed " pigtail " on conquered population for it was their hair-wear not what some idiotic Chinese propagated as racism against ethnic Hans or brainwashed Hans forgetting their NON-Manchu roots.



Sorry, I dont get what you saying by "rightly". So you think it is okay if a burglar breaks into your home, take your home away , strip off all your clothes and force you to dress like him, shave off your hair and threaten you stay that way or else you will be killed?
"Kill them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out, for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter". Quran 2:191
0

#9 User is offline   redstick426 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 01-May 06

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 29 August 2006 - 03:27 AM

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 28 2006, 07:08 PM, said:

Modern day Chinese are enslaved by past history victimhood propagated by Chinese mass media outlets and some individuals over-exaggerately recyle victimization c**p.

The BIG QUESTION is how Chinamen can leap from this grave that buried their backward live senseless souls.



Contrary to what you think, recently the PRC goverment has been doing nothing but commending the Manchus Dynasty (as you can see in all the TV drama produced by CCTV. 90% of them are pig-tail related)and glossing over the atrocity perpetruated by the Manchus.

The other thing why you belittle your own people in derogatory term "Chinamen"?


But I do agree this thread should just focus on the look of Manchus. If we want to discuss about Manchus History, we should go to the Qing section.
"Kill them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out, for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter". Quran 2:191
0

#10 Guest_RICECAKE_*

  • Group: Guest

Posted 29 August 2006 - 04:49 AM

View Postredstick426, on Aug 29 2006, 03:27 AM, said:

Contrary to what you think, recently the PRC goverment has been doing nothing but commending the Manchus Dynasty (as you can see in all the TV drama produced by CCTV. 90% of them are pig-tail related)and glossing over the atrocity perpetruated by the Manchus.


Exactly what I meant all along,past history victimization propagated by Chinese mass media outlets.

Qing Dynasty ended nearly 100 years,get a grip it's time to move on and make China a modern respectable nation instead of haunting by the past.Japanese,Westerners,and now the S Koreans make laughs at Chinese for living in the past.

Funny thing is,there are many Han Chinese have a few drops of Manchu blood.

#11 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:32 AM

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 29 2006, 03:49 AM, said:

Exactly what I meant all along,past history victimization propagated by Chinese mass media outlets.

Qing Dynasty ended nearly 100 years,get a grip it's time to move on and make China a modern respectable nation instead of haunting by the past.Japanese,Westerners,and now the S Koreans make laughs at Chinese for living in the past.

You really sound like a slave master who can command what chinese should propagate and what should not. we want to live in a happy life and of course can forgive and forget if no one want to feel pround to kill our ancestor and want to do the same thing again. but we do not do this for obeying the commandment from the supporter of the murder.

We did not "propagate" so much before we find any one who feel so proud for killling our ancestor and despice the Han blood as "coarseness blood of sheeps".

Quote

Funny thing is,there are many Han Chinese have a few drops of Manchu blood.

what is so funny then? If what you said is true, the murders are our own ancestor, why can not we blame our own ancestor, what is the hell have any thing to do with you if we blame those criminal to avoid it happen again?

When you have chance to kill us again, it does not impact if you find we have blood of Manchu, right?
Posted Image
0

#12 User is offline   WangEnlai 

  • Prime Minister (Situ/Chengxiang 司徒/丞相)
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,634
  • Joined: 06-March 06

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    none

Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:35 AM

When you talk about Manchus do you mean Manchus in Pre-Qing to Qing or do you mean modern day Manchurians/Jurchens?

I don't think current day manchurians are blood thirsty, they are as chinese as Han.
"The total amount of undesired sex endured by women is probably greater in marriage than in prostitution."

"The man who says his wife can't take a joke, forgets that she took him." -Oscar Wilde

There's a way of transferring funds that is even faster than electronic banking. It's called marriage. (all relations to the image below is strictly coincidental)

#13 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:43 AM

View PostJuchechosunmanse, on Aug 28 2006, 06:28 PM, said:

No Han blood? How about the Han Bannermen?


In bannermen (旗人) there were an signifcant proportaion of Han Chinese, actulally koreans too . Although they had privillage over the nomal Han Chinese, they were despiced inside their own club for their blood and almost never had changce to get into the royal family of Qing. Those in the above pitures above were the most important princess. Even in the royal family, those who have han blood were despiced and could not get the position high enough to enter those photographs.
Posted Image
0

#14 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:51 AM

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 28 2006, 08:08 PM, said:

Modern day Chinese are enslaved by past history victimhood propagated by Chinese mass media outlets and some individuals over-exaggerately recyle victimization c**p.

Of course, you think all the Chinese are idiots and they should ask you what is enslaving and what is not. If you have the power of Manchu-Qing regime you can run an other cycle of banning books and force Chinese to think as what you do. Unfortunately Manchu-Qing collaps 100 years ago and Chinese can do what they like themselves now. What's a pity.

View PostRICECAKE, on Aug 28 2006, 08:08 PM, said:

The big question is how Chinese can leap from this grave that buried their backward live senseless souls.

Don't worry that much, Chinese can lived very well before the Manchu-Qing's came as slave masters. They can certainly live well without the them in future.

This post has been edited by 赵丰年: 29 August 2006 - 07:54 AM

Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   赵丰年 

  • General of the Guard (Hujun Zhongwei/Jinjun Tongshuai 护军中尉/禁军统帅)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 29-January 06

Posted 29 August 2006 - 08:12 AM

View PostWangEnlai, on Aug 29 2006, 06:35 AM, said:

When you talk about Manchus do you mean Manchus in Pre-Qing to Qing or do you mean modern day Manchurians/Jurchens?

I don't think current day manchurians are blood thirsty, they are as chinese as Han.

There was no such a name Manchu in Pre-Qing. The name of Manchu was formed as a politcal orgianziation or military allien for plundering China. It comes from various sources. The predoment conponent is Jurgen, but it also include signifcant proportion of Mongol, Han and Koreans.

I do not mind what blood manchurians that much. What I mind is whether they regard other Chinese as their conparturs or their hunting object. When one see they present the picture of murders as hero above, talking about super noble blood of the murder and selling books to prove coarseness Han Chinese blood in China, apparrently, the conclusion is that someone still regards other Chinese as their hunting object and is planning another hunting party.

This post has been edited by 赵丰年: 29 August 2006 - 08:14 AM

Posted Image
0

  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Visitors have visited CHF