How much it takes to die?
#1
Posted 29 January 2007 - 12:51 PM
With and without various types of armour, how many sabre cuts or spear thrusts will be required for a soldier to get mortally wounded or dead immediately?
I got slashed once long time ago, across my back. The pain is excruciating, but never life threatening. Some stitches in hospital and i am ok. Heard from a distant friend, he got stabbed in the stomach once while being mugged and he nearly fainted from the pain and blood lost.
So anyone have answers or share something about my questions? Much appreciated.
#2
Posted 29 January 2007 - 01:28 PM
Therefor, its existence is a crime, and the punishment is death - thirdgumi
#3
Posted 29 January 2007 - 03:45 PM
thirdgumi, on Jan 29 2007, 12:28 PM, said:
True, i could shoot somebody 10,000 times in their legs and they still wouldn't die. But if you find the right place, you can kill someone with your finger!!!
#4
Posted 02 February 2007 - 01:54 AM
#5
Posted 02 February 2007 - 06:06 AM
bejean, on Feb 2 2007, 12:54 AM, said:
Some facts:
1650 - Cossaks had a fight with Dahurs in the burg of Prince Guigudar on Amur. Cossaks were in brigandines and attacked defenders with sabers and spears. They lost 4 men and killed 661 Dahurs (non-combatants included). I believe than only about 300 of them were Dahur's warriors.
1651 - Cossaks had a fight with Achans in the burg of Achansk on Amur. Cossaks (206) defeated Achans (more than 1000) by killing more then 300 of them and only 1 Cossak was killed by Achans.
1652 - Cossaks were attacked by Manchu cavalry near the burg of Achansk. 10 Cossaks were killed at the spot. Others escaped and closed in the burg. Then Manchu tried to assault the burg but were defeated. Cossaks fired a big cannon into the opening in the wall of the burg and destroyed the best Manchu warriors. Then they started to fight with sabers and won. Oficially Cossaks lost 10 killed in action and 78 wounded. Oficially (by Russian report) Manchu army lost 676 killed in action.
1686 - Cossaks and regular soldiers (so called Streltsy) were besieged in the wagenburg for 3 days by Mongols. There were about 3000 Mongols and 500 Russians. 17 Russians were killed within 3 days and 250 wounded with arrows. Russian troops had to withdraw. Mongols lost several dozens of killed and heavily wounded by Russian bullets.
1689 - One Cossak was encircled by a group of Mongols who shot him with their bows. They need 12 arrows to kill him.
1871 - Koreans fought with US marines in the fort of Kwangsungjin. Koreans fired their matchlocks, then threw stones and then ised their sabers. US mariners lost 3 killed in action and about a dozen of wounded. Koreans lost 243 killed in action. The first American killed was the Lieutenant Hugh McKee. He climbed the wall, but got a bullet in the groin, then he was thrusted with a spear and slashed with a saber. He was found after the battle alive but he died due to the sepsis. He had 19 wounds from bullet, spears and sabers!
#6
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:57 PM
#7
Posted 04 March 2007 - 03:40 AM
Nearly forgotten about this thread till someone "bumped" it up and I found something in my reading on this subject. Basically there is 2 school of thoughts here, "system shock" hypothesis and "critical wound" theory to summarize my findings that is. And i found an article appended below (lost the link, sorry). It is about bullet ballistics but it gave me a understanding of how it is to kill with a projectile, ie arrows too. Would be asking my family doctor about it when i go for my body checkup.
Mechanics of Projectile Wounding
In order to predict the likelihood of incapacitation with any handgun round, an understanding of the mechanics of wounding is necessary. There are four components of projectile wounding.6 Not all of these components relate to incapacitation, but each of them must be considered. They are:
1. Penetration. The tissue through which the projectile passes, and which it disrupts or destroys.
2. Permanent Cavity. The volume of space once occupied by tissue that has been destroyed by the passage of the projectile. This is a function of penetration and the frontal area of the projectile. Quite simply, it is the hole left by the passage of the bullet.
3. Temporary Cavity. The expansion of the permanent cavity by stretching due to the transfer of kinetic energy during the projectile's passage.
4. Fragmentation. Projectile pieces or secondary fragments of bone which are impelled outward from the permanent cavity and may sever muscle tissues, blood vessels, etc., apart from the permanent cavity.Fragmentation is not necessarily present in every projectile wound. It may, or may not, occur and can be considered a secondary effect.
Projectiles incapacitate by damaging or destroying the central nervous system, or by causing lethal blood loss. To the extent the wound components cause or increase the effects of these two mechanisms, the likelihood of incapacitation increases.
#8
Posted 04 March 2007 - 09:27 PM
BTW, where did you get those infos from Altaica Militarica?
Therefor, its existence is a crime, and the punishment is death - thirdgumi
#9
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:01 PM
#10
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:31 PM
thirdgumi, on Jan 29 2007, 01:28 PM, said:
Yes it would most likely be fatal, but it unless you hit a vital organ or an artery, a stab to the gut/intestines would be rather slow, days and very painful. You would most likely die of peritonitis. It could take a week or more. If you have enough adrenalin in a battle you would be able to continue in the battle. Once the heat of the battle was gone then you would wish that you had died in it.
CHF Newsletter
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=57
Han Lin Journal
http://www.chinahist...hp?showforum=26
Mail box for Letters to the Editor
http://www.chinahist...p...=21509&st=0
#11
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:36 PM
#12
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:45 PM
#13
Posted 04 March 2007 - 10:52 PM
#14
Posted 05 March 2007 - 12:10 AM
#15
Posted 05 March 2007 - 12:17 AM




Help
















