Route of Wala's invasion of China AD 1449? 土木之变, 瓦剌攻北
#1
Posted 31 May 2005 - 11:24 AM
Specifically, how did they break through the defences/passes of the Great Wall and threaten the capital?
[Yun's note: The Walas are better known in English as the Oirat Mongols.]
#2
Posted 01 June 2005 - 02:27 AM
#3
Posted 01 June 2005 - 06:58 AM
http://military.chin...4/12338875.html
The Oirat main body crossed the Great Wall at Datong, defeating the defending garrison of the city in battle and killing its generals. Ming Yingzong's expedition against the Oirats was meant to relieve Datong, but the vanguard suffered a crushing defeat and the retreating army of 500,000 was annihilated by the Oirats, with Yingzong taken prisoner.
Two months later, the Oirats made their move against Beijing. Esen, the Oirat leader, led 100,000 cavalry eastwards from Datong to Baiyangkou, and then south to capture Zijing Pass on the inner line of the Great Wall. From there, the Oirat advance northeast to strike at Beijing.
At the same time, 20,000 Oirats attacked Gubeikou and 50,000 Oirats attacked Juyong Pass in the east, to divert Ming troops from Beijing. However, these points were successfully defended by their Ming garrisons.
#5
Posted 03 June 2005 - 11:50 PM
Basically, after Emperor Yongle, the eunuch started to gain power. By Emperor Ming Yingzong (明英宗)'s time, the eunuch Wang Zhen (王振) became the most powerful eunuch and controlled the military and political power, taking advantage of the fact that Ming Yingzong was only 9 years.
In 1449, Wala (Oirat Mongols) invaded Ming. Under no preparation, Wang Zhen forced Ying Zong to dispatch 500,000 troops to defend Da Tong (大同). But scout reported that Da Tong was captured by Qirat Mongols and Ming troops retreated to Tu Mu Bao 土木堡 (today's Hebei province, western Huai Lei).
The Oirat troops attacked Tu Mu Bao and Ming was forced to fight and encountered much losses in casualities. Some 50 officials were killed and Ying Zong was taken hostage and Wang Zhen was also killed. This historical event is known as "incidence of Tumu" (土木之变)
After this news of Yingzong being taken hostage spreaded to the Ming court, the court was shocked. The empress announced that the emperor throne should be passed to Zhu Qiyu (朱祈钰), Ying Zong's brother. At the same time, they also discussed on how to deal with Qirat's attack.
Yu Qian (于谦), the military commander, proposed repelling Qirat at all effrot and punish all the factions of Wang Zhen (and his eunuch forces). Shortly after, Zhu Qiyu was enthroned as Emperor Daizong and Yingzong became Taishanghuang. The Qirat had attempted threaten the Ming court by taking hostage of Yingzong, after realising that this ploy didn't work, they then released Yingzong.


"夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. - Zhugeliang
#6
Posted 03 June 2005 - 11:56 PM
Quote
Actually, they were already powerful under Yongle - otherwise, why would the treasure-ship fleets all be commanded by eunuchs? What changed is that instead of them being dependent on the emperor, the emperors became dependent on them.
#8
Posted 15 December 2005 - 11:35 PM
ih8eurocentrix, on Dec 16 2005, 11:35 AM, said:
The construction/repair of the ming great wall had already begun before this disaster, if I'm not wrong. I read that it has already begun since Yongle period. In fact, during Yongle period, there are some more military campaigns against the Wala.


"夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. - Zhugeliang
#10
Posted 16 December 2005 - 12:13 AM
ih8eurocentrix, on Dec 16 2005, 04:56 AM, said:
I think the mongol use the captured Emperor to make the Ming general to open the gate. The Ming general has no choice because they will be executed anyway if they disobey the Emperor.
#11
Posted 16 December 2005 - 01:53 AM
Quote
Are you referring to the Zijing Pass? Can someone provide more details of this incident if it did take place?
#12
Posted 16 December 2005 - 01:56 AM
jiangji, on Dec 16 2005, 01:13 PM, said:
That was not how it happened.
As Yun mentioned in post #2, the Oirats had already breached the pass at the Great Wall before the battle of Tumu they captured the emperor.
See the maps I posted in post #4.
AD 1449
7th month
11th day : The Oirat leader Esen defeated the Ming forces at Mao'Er Zhuang (猫儿庄).
15th day : The poorly led and supported Ming garrison at Datong (大同) was routed at YangHe (阳和). The Great Wall was effectively breached.
I suspect at that time, the Great Wall along that particular area was not the most strongly fortified type which enable defenders to resist attackers easily. In any case, that region was traditionally considered as beyond the Passes (塞外). The actual defensive walls were those indicated by the inner lines in the map, with Passes like JuYong Pass (居庸关).
Maps showing unbroken lines of walls along the Great Wall could be quite misleading.
Much of the walls were not intended to keep out invaders like the Maginot Line (people could climb over the wall and it was impossible to guard every section), but to make it more difficult for horse-mounted raiders to cross and return with their loots.
At Datong, the defence relied on the fortress of JùMénBŭ (拒门堡), which was actually one of the four garrisons beyond the Passes (塞外四堡) designed as advanced bulwarks protecting the Great Wall.
#13
Posted 16 December 2005 - 02:09 AM
Yun, on Dec 16 2005, 02:53 PM, said:
I don't think it did.
The ZiJing Pass (紫荆关) was breached when a Ming traitor, the captured eunuch Xi Ning (喜宁) who was familiar with the military deployment at the Pass, showed the Oirats a mountain route which enabled the Pass to be attacked from the front and the rear. Esen arrived on 9th day of the 10th month to take personal command. The defending generals Han Qing (韩青) and Sun Xiang (孙祥) were killed in action.
#14
Posted 16 December 2005 - 02:12 AM
http://www.meet-grea...wcn/egwcn10.htm
I would agree that the Great Wall of that time was not as well fortified and defended as the Ming wall we see today. It was mostly a rammed-earth wall without parapets or towers:
Quote
From http://www.meet-grea...gwcn/egwcn6.htm
The wall was only improved to its present level after Tan Lun and Qi Jiguang were assigned to reinforce it in 1568.
This post has been edited by Yun: 16 December 2005 - 03:46 AM
#15
Posted 16 December 2005 - 03:02 AM
I saw Yun's question in post #11 only after sending in post #12, this type of thing do happen in forums like this ...
[From Yun: No probs, I've edited my Post #14]
This post has been edited by Yun: 16 December 2005 - 03:47 AM




Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote





