China History Forum, Chinese History Forum: Map of Tang - China History Forum, Chinese History Forum

Jump to content

  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Map of Tang Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Karl

  • Prefect (Taishou 太守)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 02-June 05

Posted 02 June 2005 - 06:13 PM

Do you know where I can get a map of Tang at its peak? Thanks.
0

#2 User is offline   Gweilo

  • Grand Mentor (Taishi 太师)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 427
  • Joined: 03-June 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Houston, Texas, USA

  • Interests:Travel, fitness, history, games.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    General Chinese History

Posted 02 June 2005 - 07:02 PM

You need to look in this older thread here.
Explore Chinese history by playing Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom
0

#3 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,632
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 03 June 2005 - 01:34 PM

The height of Tang, promximation here.
http://www.nhyz.org/...n/asia7cen2.jpg

Yrimondi have posted the Zhong Yuan Tu before which has a more detailed version, but somehow the maps aren't working, and I have no time to look into CnYahoo and find it.
0

#4 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,632
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 03 June 2005 - 02:48 PM

Here is a map of the territory of political INFLUENCE of the Tang http://vip.6to23.com...ity8/map/16.jpg
0

#5 User is offline   General_Zhaoyun

  • Grand Valiant General of Imperial Han Army
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 10,958
  • Joined: 24-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore (Taiwanese/Singapore Permanent Resident)

  • Interests:Chinese History, Chinese Philosophy, Chinese languages, Hokkien language, Classical Chinese, General Chinese Culture

  • Languages spoken:Mandarin, Taiwanese Hokkien, English, German, Singlish

  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Taiwanese Hoklo)

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Culture, chinese language and literature, confucianism, buddhism, chinese strategy

Posted 03 June 2005 - 11:19 PM

It's interesting to note that there were 3 large empires at that time:

Tang
Islamic Empire
Byzantine

Tang seemed to be the most powerful at that time, but after the defeat by the Arabs at the battle of Talas in 750s, its strength has decreased.
Posted ImagePosted Image

"夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮

One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. -
Zhugeliang
0

#6 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,632
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 04 June 2005 - 07:09 PM

Yes there was, but Byzantine is not one of them, the other one been the Tubo empire.
And stop bring up Talas again, it was pinprick damage to Tang power.
0

#7 User is offline   Karl

  • Prefect (Taishou 太守)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 02-June 05

Posted 07 June 2005 - 08:00 PM

Thanks. I've located the attached map.
0

#8 User is online   qrasy

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 03-April 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Hong Kong

  • Interests:Physics, Chemistry, Maths, Biology, Languages, Ethnicity, History, etc.

  • Languages spoken:English, Indonesian, Mandarin Chinese, (basic) Cantonese

  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Southern)

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Other Interests

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Linguistics

Posted 29 July 2005 - 04:36 AM

Karl, on Jun 3 2005, 06:13 AM, said:

Do you know where I can get a map of Tang at its peak? Thanks.
View Post

I have a map here:
http://www.allempire...map11chi_sm.jpg
Posted Image

General_Zhaoyun, on Jun 4 2005, 11:19 AM, said:

It's interesting to note that there were 3 large empires at that time:

Tang
Islamic Empire
Byzantine

Tang seemed to be the most powerful at that time, but after the defeat by the Arabs at the battle of Talas in 750s, its strength has decreased.
View Post

So Tang Empire did meet Arabs in war. What is 'battle of Talas'?

This post has been edited by qrasy: 29 July 2005 - 04:37 AM

Posted Image
Every theory is killed sooner or later... But if the theory has good in it, that good is embodied and continued in the next theory — Albert Einstein
0

#9 User is online   Tibet Libre

  • Supreme Censor (Yushi Dafu 御史大夫)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 1,101
  • Joined: 01-March 05

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 29 July 2005 - 06:32 AM

qrasy, on Jul 29 2005, 03:36 AM, said:

So Tang Empire did meet Arabs in war. What is 'battle of Talas'?


Talas is a battle between an Arab army and Tang forces in 751 which ended with a decisive victory of the Arabs. It is controversial discussed on this forum how much effect the battle ultimately had on the geopolitical alignment of Central Asia to the Muslim world.

Both Tang and Umayyad empire share the limelight of that time, but it's hard to see how the Umayyad empire, stretching from the Atlantic to the Indus, could have been second to any contemporary empire in terms of power.
0

#10 User is offline   DaMo

  • Prime Minister (Situ/Chengxiang 司徒/丞相)
  • Icon
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,743
  • Joined: 28-June 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Dubai

  • Interests:History, Philosophy, Law, Political Science, InfoTech

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Asian History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Prehistory, Early Imperial, Samguk

Posted 29 July 2005 - 08:48 AM

warhead, on Jun 3 2005, 06:34 PM, said:

The height of Tang, promximation here.
http://www.nhyz.org/...n/asia7cen2.jpg

Yrimondi have posted the Zhong Yuan Tu before which has a more detailed version, but somehow the maps aren't working, and I have no time to look into CnYahoo and find it.
View Post

What are the red and yellow lines?
"If an archeologist calls something a finial, he usually he has no idea what it is"
"We Vandals get blamed for stuff that was actually done by some errant Lombard or Visigoth"
"Nationalism is much about forgetting as it is about remembering"
0

#11 User is offline   snowybeagle

  • Sentinel of the Southern Star (鎮南星)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 5,197
  • Joined: 09-June 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 31 July 2005 - 09:29 PM

warhead, on Jun 5 2005, 08:09 AM, said:

And stop bring up Talas again, it was pinprick damage to Tang power.

Perhaps, but consider too the potential lost.
Europe and the Far East could have been brought together much closer ...
Talas meant Central Asia would continue to be the profiteering middlemen for centuries to come ... not to mention providing substantial support for the Islamic empires in Central Asia and the Near/Middle East ...
Even without going too far into speculation ... the Tang might be rather indifferent to Talas, but not the Muslims ...
0

#12 User is offline   naruwan

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 2,156
  • Joined: 23-June 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Language

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Taiwanese History and Culture, Taiwanese Holo language, Chinese Pseudo history

Posted 01 August 2005 - 04:43 PM

I miss the Talas thread. Let's bring it back XD
mudanin kata mudanin kata. kata siki-a kata siki-a. muhaiv ludun muhaiv ludun. kanta sipal tas-tas kanta sipal tas-tas. kanta sipal tunuh kanta sipal tunuh. sikavilun vini daingaz sikavilun vini daingaz.

Former hansioux
0

#13 User is offline   naruwan

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 2,156
  • Joined: 23-June 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Language

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Taiwanese History and Culture, Taiwanese Holo language, Chinese Pseudo history

Posted 01 August 2005 - 05:09 PM

It's just so sad to see these maps. Although they are supposed to reflect the historical truth of Tang dynasty, signs of political projections are everywhere.

In one map, the one from 歷史迴廊, draw Tibet as a part of Tang. I'd like to find out what is the basis for this. Tang has never had control over the Tibetan area. Yes Tang conqured the 吐魯蕃 (in some translations 吐谷渾) but that's not Tibet.

If it is based on Tibet paying tribute to Tang, then why aren't Corea, Japan, and the entire Asian steppes painted as part of Tang?

Some of them included Yunan as a part of Tang. Which couldn't be more inaccurate.

And for some maps to include Taiwan as part of Tang dynasty can only be the evidence of political agendas distorting history.
mudanin kata mudanin kata. kata siki-a kata siki-a. muhaiv ludun muhaiv ludun. kanta sipal tas-tas kanta sipal tas-tas. kanta sipal tunuh kanta sipal tunuh. sikavilun vini daingaz sikavilun vini daingaz.

Former hansioux
0

#14 User is offline   Gubook Janggoon

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Joined: 10-August 04

  • Interests:Korean history (Plus Asian history in general), European history, U.S. history, Pretending to speak Spanish, and Pirates

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

Posted 01 August 2005 - 05:12 PM

qrasy, on Jul 29 2005, 01:36 AM, said:



I've said it before, and I'll say it again. This map really bugs me. Were Koreans the only tributary states to Tang? I find this a little crazy.

They also just clump Goguryeo, Baekje, and Shilla into one big mess of a blob and just slap the tributary label on it. ::shakes head::
"Don't be in a hurry to condemn because he doesn't do what you do or think as you think or as fast. There was a time when you didn't know what you know today." -Malcolm X
0

#15 User is offline   naruwan

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Icon
  • Group: CHF Grand Historian Award
  • Posts: 2,156
  • Joined: 23-June 05

  • Gender:Male

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese Language

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Taiwanese History and Culture, Taiwanese Holo language, Chinese Pseudo history

Posted 01 August 2005 - 05:20 PM

Gubook Janggoon, on Aug 1 2005, 03:12 PM, said:

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.  This map really bugs me.  Were Koreans the only tributary states to Tang?  I find this a little crazy. 

They also just clump Goguryeo, Baekje, and Shilla into one big mess of a blob and just slap the tributary label on it.  ::shakes head::
View Post


Every single one of these maps bugs me. Since every single one of them had a political message they want to slip under your eye lids.
mudanin kata mudanin kata. kata siki-a kata siki-a. muhaiv ludun muhaiv ludun. kanta sipal tas-tas kanta sipal tas-tas. kanta sipal tunuh kanta sipal tunuh. sikavilun vini daingaz sikavilun vini daingaz.

Former hansioux
0

  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Visitors have visited CHF