China History Forum, Chinese History Forum: The Beiyang Navy - China History Forum, Chinese History Forum

Jump to content

Loading

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Beiyang Navy China's first modern navy and its defeat, 1894-95 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Yun 

  • Sage-King
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 9,057
  • Joined: 30-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore/USA

  • Interests:Ancient Chinese history, with a focus on the Age of Fragmentation. Chinese ethnicities, religion, philosophy, music, and art and material culture. Military history in general.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Three Kingdoms, Age of Fragmentation, Sui-Tang

Posted 02 August 2004 - 12:23 AM

Just found this good site on the history of the Imperial Chinese Navy, with a focus on the Beiyang Navy that was destroyed in battle by the Japanese in 1894-95: http://www.beiyang.org/index.htm

Especially interesting is news that a project is underway to reconstruct the battleship Dingyuan 定远, flagship of the Beiyang Navy. Photos here: http://www.beiyang.org/dingyuan/bd.htm

Unfortunately, the English version of the site is not ready yet. Those of you who can't read Chinese can check back at a later date.
The dead have passed beyond our power to honour or dishonour them, but not beyond our ability to try and understand.
0

#2 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 02 August 2004 - 04:13 PM

I might present a full detailed account of the sino-japanese naval war later. some of Zhen Yuan's (sister ship of Ding Yuan) parts I believe still exist in Japanese museums after they dismantled it.
0

#3 User is offline   General_Zhaoyun 

  • Grand Valiant General of Imperial Han Army
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 11,597
  • Joined: 24-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore (Taiwanese/Singapore Permanent Resident)

  • Interests:Chinese History, Chinese Philosophy and Religion, Chinese languages, Minnan/Taiwanese language, Classical Chinese, General Chinese Culture

  • Languages spoken:Mandarin, Taiwanese (Hokkien), English, German, Singlish

  • Ethnic Groups or Race:Han Chinese (Taiwanese Hoklo)

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    General Chinese Culture

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese Language, History and Culture

Posted 02 August 2004 - 08:52 PM

It's a great site.. :P Are they an info on the type of warships used?
Posted ImagePosted Image

"夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮

One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. -
Zhugeliang
0

#4 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 03 August 2004 - 09:56 AM

Ding Yuan and Zhen Yuan were large battleships, while others such as Fu Long are torpedo boats. Fast moving ships including Ji Yuan, however the japanese ships by 1890 were faster and was crucial to their victory.

btw did you know that the Bei Yang fleet at its height in the late 1880s is the strongest in Asia and rank 7th in the world even ahead of the United States navy which rank 12th.
0

#5 User is offline   Yun 

  • Sage-King
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 9,057
  • Joined: 30-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore/USA

  • Interests:Ancient Chinese history, with a focus on the Age of Fragmentation. Chinese ethnicities, religion, philosophy, music, and art and material culture. Military history in general.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Three Kingdoms, Age of Fragmentation, Sui-Tang

Posted 03 August 2004 - 01:47 PM

Yes, that makes sense to me. The US only began its naval building programme under President Theodore Roosevelt in the 1890s - this was under the influence of Alfred Thayer Mahan, who had predicted that the US could become a great sea power with the opening of the Panama Canal.

I've always been interested to know who came up with the names for the ships in the Beiyang navy. Dingyuan ("Stabilising distant regions"), Zhenyuan ("Calming distant regions"), Jiyuan ("Bringing help to distant regions"), Jingyuan ("Pacifying distant regions"), Pingyuan ("Subduing distant regions"), etc. are all such meaningful names. But my personal favourite is Chaoyong ("Exceptional Courage"). I think it would be nice if the PRC navy started using warship names that express certain qualities, rather than naming their ships after provinces and cities, which can get really boring.
The dead have passed beyond our power to honour or dishonour them, but not beyond our ability to try and understand.
0

#6 User is offline   Moping4U 

  • Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 225
  • Joined: 01-July 04

Posted 03 August 2004 - 02:28 PM

What ever happen to the Nanyang navy?
0

#7 User is offline   Sephodwyrm 

  • Vanguard of Zhan Guo (战国先锋)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 2,711
  • Joined: 31-May 04

  • Location:Tucson, Arizona, US of A

  • Interests:Upsetting regional imbalances

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Warring States Military, Chinese Sketches and Artwork

Posted 09 August 2004 - 01:50 PM

It was destroyed in the harbor by the French navy after they failed to take Taiwan. In an effort not to escalate the war further, one of the Manchu commanders ordered the Nanyang fleet not to engage the French navy. This is not reciprocated by the French...
Maxim-Ivan Illustrations
Chief Editor and Founder
Our Deviantart Site
0

#8 User is offline   Borjigin Ayurbarwada 

  • Emperor (Huangdi 皇帝)
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Joined: 17-June 04

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Chinese History, Chinese Military History, Qing dynasty history

Posted 09 August 2004 - 04:28 PM

No its not completely destroyed, during the sino japanese war, Ding Ruchang still asked for the nan yang's help but twas refused by the admiral in command.
0

#9 User is offline   Moping4U 

  • Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)
  • Group: Entry Scholar (Xiucai)
  • Posts: 225
  • Joined: 01-July 04

Posted 10 August 2004 - 02:22 AM

I think the fleet that was destroyed by the French was the Fuzhou Fleet or was it also part of the Nayang Fleet as well?
0

#10 User is offline   Yun 

  • Sage-King
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 9,057
  • Joined: 30-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore/USA

  • Interests:Ancient Chinese history, with a focus on the Age of Fragmentation. Chinese ethnicities, religion, philosophy, music, and art and material culture. Military history in general.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Three Kingdoms, Age of Fragmentation, Sui-Tang

Posted 09 August 2005 - 08:00 AM

More on the Beiyang Navy, including a recent reconstruction of the Dingyuan: http://www.chinahist...p?showtopic=543
The dead have passed beyond our power to honour or dishonour them, but not beyond our ability to try and understand.
0

#11 User is offline   astralis 

  • Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 07-July 04

Posted 09 August 2005 - 03:40 PM

from Chu and Liu's "Li Hung-chang and China's Early Modernization,"

"Comprising 65.4 percent of the entire fleet, the seventeen ships were built abroad, thirteen in England and four in Germany. They were either battleships, cruisers, or other warships, except for one...Chen-yuan and Ting-yuan were built by the Vulcan shipyards in Germany and were each 298 feet, 5 inches long; 60 feet, 4 inches wide; and 19 feet, 6 inches in draft. The reinforced middle part of the hull was 144 feet long and 14 inches thick, the shielding of the gun deck was 12 inches thick, and that of the commander's deck, 8 inches thick. Both ships had 6,000 horsepower and a speed of 14.5 nautical miles per hour. They each carried ten cannon, including four heavy ones with a caliber of 12 inches installed front and back. Other artillery on each of these ships including ten five-barrel Gatling guns, 525 breechloading Gatling guns, and torpedoes. The two warships were very powerful and were considered of superior quality by international standards...

The modern navy was an innovation of the nineteenth century...Considering all aspects- industry, science, and technology, personnel, and finance- China at the time was quite unqualified to support a modern navy. It was only through the almost single-handed efforts of Li Hung-chang that the Peiyang Navy even came into existence. With ten years of continuous effort, he had created a fleet of 30 warships, 120 guns, and 4000 officers and men, superior, at least numerically, to Japan's naval forces."

pg. 256-9
0

#12 User is offline   Miborovsky 

  • Grand Tutor (Taifu 太傅)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 353
  • Joined: 01-May 05

  • Location:Olympia, WA

Posted 12 August 2005 - 10:51 AM

Thank you.

edit: wait, 525 gattling guns? Sure or not? :blink:

This post has been edited by mib: 12 August 2005 - 11:19 AM

All characters and events in the above post -- even those based on real people -- are entirely fictional, and as such, should not be taken seriously, except in a fictional way. All facts are fabricated... poorly. This post contains extreme neo-contraantidisestablishmentarian political ideas and due to its contents it should not be viewed by anyone. The author is not responsible for any emotional stress, physical harm, international tensions or global thermonuclear war that may result from viewing this post.
0

#13 User is offline   astralis 

  • Grand Guardian (Taibao 太保)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 07-July 04

Posted 12 August 2005 - 05:10 PM

well, my quote page was off: it's page 253-9, not 256. the source is a good one.

by the way, if you think about it, gatling guns in term of naval warfare of that period was not all that useful...
0

#14 User is offline   Miborovsky 

  • Grand Tutor (Taifu 太傅)
  • Group: CHF Beginner
  • Posts: 353
  • Joined: 01-May 05

  • Location:Olympia, WA

Posted 12 August 2005 - 06:17 PM

astralis, on Aug 12 2005, 03:10 PM, said:

well, my quote page was off: it's page 253-9, not 256. the source is a good one.

by the way, if you think about it, gatling guns in term of naval warfare of that period was not all that useful...
View Post


Is it even possible to fit 525 gattling guns on a ship? :huh:
All characters and events in the above post -- even those based on real people -- are entirely fictional, and as such, should not be taken seriously, except in a fictional way. All facts are fabricated... poorly. This post contains extreme neo-contraantidisestablishmentarian political ideas and due to its contents it should not be viewed by anyone. The author is not responsible for any emotional stress, physical harm, international tensions or global thermonuclear war that may result from viewing this post.
0

#15 User is offline   Yun 

  • Sage-King
  • Group: CHF Han Lin Scholar
  • Posts: 9,057
  • Joined: 30-May 04

  • Gender:Male

  • Location:Singapore/USA

  • Interests:Ancient Chinese history, with a focus on the Age of Fragmentation. Chinese ethnicities, religion, philosophy, music, and art and material culture. Military history in general.

  • Main Interest in CHF:
    Chinese History

  • Specialisation / Expertise:
    Three Kingdoms, Age of Fragmentation, Sui-Tang

Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:19 PM

Read more closely - the source says there were only 10 of thr 5-barrell Gatlings we're familiar with. The other 525 'breech-loading' Gatling guns were probably just rifles.
The dead have passed beyond our power to honour or dishonour them, but not beyond our ability to try and understand.
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Visitors have visited CHF