The Hakka people
#1
Posted 21 June 2004 - 09:47 AM
There've been different theories put forward as to when the Hakka first came to the south - the Qin, the Eastern Jin, and the late Tang have all been identified as times of upheaval in the north that would have caused large southward migrations. The Hakka language, perhaps to a greater extent than Cantonese and Hokkien, preserves many elements of Ancient and Middle Chinese pronunciation that have been lost in north China (due to influences from the languages of northern ethnicities like the Mongols and Manchus). In fact, I have been told jokingly that Hakka was the "national language" of the Eastern Jin - which is not strictly true because the Luoyang dialect of the Jin elite is not totally equivalent to Hakka.
Another strange theory (which I only heard of recently) is that the Hakka are descended from Xiongnu! There is a description of this theory on the following website: http://www.asiawind....y.htm#migration
I encourage you guys to read the rest of the website as well... Lee Siu-leung may not be an academic (although he has a PhD), and his views on some topics (such as Gavin Menzies' Zheng He theory) strike me as rather naive, but the amount of work he has done on Hakka history is truly praiseworthy.
#2
Posted 24 June 2004 - 10:57 AM
Like thousands of others, my wife's mother and father escaped the Communist takeover of the mainland and fled into Hong Kong in the early 1950s. They established a life in HK and from speaking with my wife I get the impression they lost ties with many of their relatives who stayed behind.
My mother-in-law passed away last year, and she was extremely elderly when I first met her. She no longer wore the traditional Hakka bamboo hats, but my wife tells me at one time she did wear those. I think that living in HK for 50 years pulled her away from some of the traditional Hakka ways, which is understandable. My MIL still spoke the Hakka dialect, though, and this was how my wife learned it.
There are still some villages in the HK SAR that are comprised almost entirely of Hakka, and they still follow the traditional customs. They often show them (especially the women wearing the bamboo hats) in travel guides, like Fodor's and Lonely Planet.
#3
Posted 24 June 2004 - 02:53 PM
The wear bamboo hats with black veils to protect them from the sun. I've seen many pictures, and I still see people wearing them at my Ancestral Hometown.
Anyone heard of Qitang?Ancestral Temples?
葉兆峰
andrew.yip@us.army.mil
John 3:16
#4
Posted 28 June 2004 - 02:05 AM
Yes, the Hakka (客家人) people indeed originated from the north China but migrated southwards to south China because of war and famine. Currently, they resided in the eastern part of Guangdong province (some in HongKong) as well as in Taiwan (in Hsinchu, Zhanghua etc.) . There are also Hakka people in Singapore and Malaysia as well as north and south America.


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
#5
Posted 28 June 2004 - 02:39 AM
http://www.i1.net/~a...kka/toihak0.htm .
What do you guys think of this?
#6
Posted 28 June 2004 - 03:12 AM
My gut feeling is that this guy has an agenda that many other Taiwanese seem to share these days - asserting a separate ethnic identity from China, especially from North China. That agenda apparently includes arguing that the Taiwanese Hakka are not really "Chinese" because they were never truly assimilated into a Chinese state.
Another example of such attempts is a Taiwanese theory that the Min Nan (Fujian) people of Taiwan are actually descended from the "Hundred Yue" 百越 of the Fujian area, and not from the Han. In a National Geographic article about the Han dynasty several months ago, the whole Fujian-Zhejiang area was even shown as lying outside Eastern Han control, and still being ruled by the Bai Yue. Such an idea is so strange that I immediately suspected that some Taiwanese scholars were behind it.
#7
Guest_cheapfujianese_*
Posted 28 June 2004 - 10:52 AM
#8
Posted 28 June 2004 - 02:52 PM
That's was my reaction Yun: this research is probably being used to push forward a separtist movement in Taiwan and legitimatising Taiwan's claims to independence.The page that WuTao gave looks at the question from the perspective of genetics research. Another page on the website uses a different perspective - a review of existing scholarship on the origin of the Hakka: http://www.i1.net/~a...ka/toihakka.htm
My gut feeling is that this guy has an agenda that many other Taiwanese seem to share these days - asserting a separate ethnic identity from China, especially from North China. That agenda apparently includes arguing that the Taiwanese Hakka are not really "Chinese" because they were never truly assimilated into a Chinese state.
Another example of such attempts is a Taiwanese theory that the Min Nan (Fujian) people of Taiwan are actually descended from the "Hundred Yue" 百越 of the Fujian area, and not from the Han. In a National Geographic article about the Han dynasty several months ago, the whole Fujian-Zhejiang area was even shown as lying outside Eastern Han control, and still being ruled by the Bai Yue. Such an idea is so strange that I immediately suspected that some Taiwanese scholars were behind it.
At the same time, much of the research cited was came from researchers who were not Chinese (and therefore probably didn't have any political aims), or came from the mainland, so I do believe that it is accurate in portaying those from the south as not being descended from the Han (which in no way means that they are not Chinese, though).
#9
Posted 14 July 2004 - 10:57 AM
I think it was earlier than that, it was during Jin dynasty. That was why hakkan dialect was considered the oldest Chinese dialet.Hakkas originally came from the North and fled to the South mainly after the fall of the Tang dynasty.
Therefor, its existence is a crime, and the punishment is death - thirdgumi
#10
Guest_cheapfujianese_*
Posted 19 July 2004 - 01:55 AM
#11
Posted 19 July 2004 - 04:58 AM


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
#12
Posted 29 July 2004 - 12:47 AM
#13
Posted 29 July 2004 - 01:24 AM
#14
Posted 29 July 2004 - 01:51 AM
#15
Posted 29 July 2004 - 03:17 AM


"夫君子之行:靜以修身,儉以養德;非淡泊無以明志,非寧靜無以致遠。" - 諸葛亮
One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. If you are not simple and frugal, your ambition will not sparkle. If you are not calm and cool, you will not reach far. - Zhugeliang
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











