Ming invasion of Japan?
#1 Guest_Conan the destroyer_*
Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:00 PM
1. Did Yongle actually plan to invade?
2. Do you think he could have been succesful?
3. If Yongle succeeded in conquering Japan, how would it have effected the world?
#3
Posted 10 January 2006 - 11:39 PM
The financial situation at that time has actually turning worse. Money always has been a problem for Ming. Also, Large amount of money has been spent on Zheng He Voyages, Mongol expedition, rebuilding grand canal, improve great wall, horse trading and building forbiden palace. Imperial treasuries was pretty empty and not possible to support the Wars.
Even if Yongle conquer japan, his descendents will not be able to keep it for long. After Yongle died, the mongol defeat Ming army and Annam declare independence in 1427. So, I would says it only be a temporary glory or even can bring down the entire Ming dynasty.
This post has been edited by jiangji: 10 January 2006 - 11:40 PM
#4
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:53 AM
#5
Posted 07 April 2006 - 05:16 AM
Mi Charmel, Mi Charmel, Mi Charmel La Belle
I woke this morning and all seemed peaceful
But oppression still exists.
#6 Guest_Conan the destroyer_*
Posted 07 April 2006 - 07:44 AM
Hoa Phau, on Apr 7 2006, 11:16 AM, said:
We're talking about the late 14th, early 15th centuries. Long before contact with Europeans.
#7
Posted 07 April 2006 - 10:09 AM
Conan the destroyer, on Jan 11 2006, 03:00 AM, said:
Perhaps (had Japan been brought-to-boot) Japan would just have served as another island serving as a temporary home for the Ming once the Manchu/Qing took over in the 17th Century. The Ming on Japan may have survived (1-200 years of integration having taken place) but unlikely that the local clans would have just let an opportunity slip to remove them.
#8
Posted 08 April 2006 - 02:58 AM
Conan the destroyer, on Apr 7 2006, 07:44 AM, said:
ok,
maybe mings would end up defeated for japan's tactics seemed unbeatable to the mings, japanese forces have strong defences like castles built and warriors trained to withstand the invasion.
or these mings might end up like mongols who are shipwrecked after storms and strong waves known as kamkaze before they could capture japan.
Mi Charmel, Mi Charmel, Mi Charmel La Belle
I woke this morning and all seemed peaceful
But oppression still exists.
#9
Posted 08 April 2006 - 05:26 AM
Hoa Phau, on Apr 8 2006, 03:58 PM, said:
maybe mings would end up defeated for japan's tactics seemed unbeatable to the mings, japanese forces have strong defences like castles built and warriors trained to withstand the invasion.
or these mings might end up like mongols who are shipwrecked after storms and strong waves known as kamkaze before they could capture japan.
Are the Janpanese castles "STRONG DEFENCES"? I don't recognize the castles which are not any larger than a Chinese lord's manor would be stronger than any chinese city with stable wall, even I can't imagine the cruel vision that they'are under attack by the cannons, blunderbusses, and trebuchets etc.
Japanese castles are exactly bull, except their appearance.
#11 Guest_Conan the destroyer_*
Posted 08 April 2006 - 08:08 AM
Hoa Phau, on Apr 8 2006, 08:58 AM, said:
maybe mings would end up defeated for japan's tactics seemed unbeatable to the mings, japanese forces have strong defences like castles built and warriors trained to withstand the invasion.
or these mings might end up like mongols who are shipwrecked after storms and strong waves known as kamkaze before they could capture japan.
I don't think 14th-15th century Japanese tactics seemed "unbeatable" to the Ming. Indeed, Ming tactics were much more advanced at this time, with a great emphasis on maneuvre warfare and gunpowder weapons. In the 16th century things were more equal.
This post has been edited by Conan the destroyer: 08 April 2006 - 08:10 AM
#12
Posted 08 April 2006 - 01:59 PM
dinowong, on Apr 8 2006, 05:26 AM, said:
Japanese castles are exactly bull, except their appearance.
I wouldn't be so quick to snub other people's defenses. But to tell the truth, Castles? Whoopee. Everyone has them, it's not something terribly special.
#13
Posted 09 April 2006 - 10:59 PM
Hoa Phau, on Apr 8 2006, 01:58 AM, said:
maybe mings would end up defeated for japan's tactics seemed unbeatable to the mings, japanese forces have strong defences like castles built and warriors trained to withstand the invasion.
or these mings might end up like mongols who are shipwrecked after storms and strong waves known as kamkaze before they could capture japan.
Back up your assertions, elaborate on 'japan's tactics', and how such tactics may fared against the Ming.
Fact was, samurai 'tactics' focused on personal and small-scale combat and rarely operated in a large coordinated scale regardless of quantity of fielded troops. The defeats of samurai pirates by 戚繼光's forces suggests japanese incapacity at handling large-scale maneuvers.
#14
Posted 10 April 2006 - 01:38 AM
Conan the destroyer, on Jan 11 2006, 02:00 AM, said:
1. Did Yongle actually plan to invade?
2. Do you think he could have been succesful?
3. If Yongle succeeded in conquering Japan, how would it have effected the world?
Just a slight correction regarding Yoshimochi. Yoshimochi Ashikaga was the shogun of Japan at that time. Emperor Go-Komatsu (後小松天皇 Go-Komatsu Tennō) (August 1, 1377 - December 1, 1433) was the 100th imperial ruler of Japan. The Shogun, the effective ruler of Japan, still ruled under the Emperor's name.
1. Yongle would not have the energy and time to consider opening so many fronts of war. He was already busy with the Mongols and Annam.
2. Given the technology of the time, perhaps yes, especially with Zheng He's ability to travel in long distance. However, by the vessel by which Zheng He travel were more geared towards to exploration than conquest. Again to take into consideration of Point 1, the Mings are tied up elsewhere.
3. If Japan should come under Ming's rule, it would not make much difference. The Emperor Hongxi who came after Yongle had shut off the travels of Zheng He. Xuande who came after Hongxi, was also busy with Annam and Mongolia, again doubtful either of the Emperors would even consider consolidating their hold over Japan, as long as Japan are willing to pay tribute to the Imperial Ming throne.
#15
Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:15 PM
Strangelove, on Apr 9 2006, 09:59 PM, said:
Fact was, samurai 'tactics' focused on personal and small-scale combat and rarely operated in a large coordinated scale regardless of quantity of fielded troops. The defeats of samurai pirates by 戚繼光's forces suggests japanese incapacity at handling large-scale maneuvers.
Japanese pirates should not be a measure of the Japanese armies' fighting ability anymore then Chinese pirates are of the Ming military strength. Also many of the pirates that Qi Jiguang fought were from many nations including a significant number of Chinese.




Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote





