Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Chinese Sword Questions
China History Forum, Chinese History Forum > Chinese History Topics > Ancient Chinese Arsenal
m707
Hi I've recently learnt that the swords used by samurais evolve from ancient chinese swords.
Since then I have develop an interest in ancient chinese swords.

I would like to learn more about the swords of China, some questions includes;


Did the ancient chinese invent the sword ? If not who influence them.


Besides Dao, Jin, Saber, Dagger, Sha what other names were given to Chinese swords and are
these names only used when refering to Chinese swords ?


The different styles of swordsmanship associated with different chinese swords.


How popular was the sword compare to other weapons used in ancient china ?
(amongst different class of people eg armies, royalty, civilians)



Would appreciate any information given. Hope I'm not asking too much, short one
sentence answer for each question will do if you are short of time.

I have visited Thomas Chen's website, the pictures were amazing. Thanks in advance. charge.gif
Wujiang
QUOTE(m707 @ Aug 30 2006, 07:34 AM) [snapback]4843507[/snapback]
Did the ancient chinese invent the sword ? If not who influence them.

Invented.

QUOTE
Besides Dao, Jin, Saber, Dagger, Sha what other names were given to Chinese swords and are
these names only used when refering to Chinese swords ?
Technically, those are not names. Those are words. But the dao and jian are the most common one. Any more specific and it would be the type of dao or jian in question

QUOTE
The different styles of swordsmanship associated with different chinese swords.

Modern day swordplay are designed primarily for the liuyuedao. Any different 'styles' of swords would be more of a matter of adapting to using different types of swords. For example the wide and heavy podao or the tachi-infludence wodao.

QUOTE
How popular was the sword compare to other weapons used in ancient china ?
(amongst different class of people eg armies, royalty, civilians)

Depends. Since the Han dynasty, it has been taken off the battlefield so soldiers doesn't use it. Even among civilians, most jianghu people don't prefer it either. The Jian was more prefer among the upper-class/educated class as the use of the jian are more complex thus more suited for those who are academics. The principles of swordsmanship could also be reflected onto other facts of life such as metaphysics and ethics. The jian was used as a symbol for both power and education. Most jiangs would carry a jian when commanding an army. The jian is the only weapon within teh chinese arsenal who has no negative image on it at all. Even the qiang can only say it isn't entirely negative.
Kenneth
QUOTE
Did the ancient chinese invent the sword ? If not who influence them.

How popular was the sword compare to other weapons used in ancient china ?
(amongst different class of people eg armies, royalty, civilians)


I would need to clarify a couple of Wujiangs points.
The ancient Chinese did not invent the first sword, although they invented their own types of swords and did so independently. They are sometimes influenced in part by outside cultures on occasion although unique Chinese styles can be found nowhere else. I am not sure what Wujiang meant by 'invented' but it is true Chinese forms such as the jian and some other early blades are independant inventions. Swords exist much earlier in basically similar double edged forms to jian in Europe and the 'near-East', occuring independently. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age_sword
There is no suggested connection between the regions weapons and the development and appearance of early Chinese swords show they come from shorter Chinese weapons like bronze double edged daggers and evolved over centuries into true bronze swords, and then later iron/steel swords.

The sword was a very popular weapon in ancient China from the Warring States period onwards. Earlier it was a self defense weapon but from the 4-5th century BC onwards it is a real battlefield tool.
It was a weapon for close combat since polearms are less useful in close fighting so it was either secondary or primary in application. Some troops were armed with swords and shields for specific battles or assualts. In the Han dynasty swordsmen deployments are mentioned in literature and also found depicted in Han art & artefacts, such as ceramic armies. It must be stressed though that long hafted (spear & halberds) and shorter weapons existed contemporaneously.
The sword was still on occasion used as a primary weapon in battle even after the Han period. Art from the Period of Disunity show battles were the vast majority of troops are armed with the early style dao and shield and polearm warriors are vastly outnumbered by swordsmen. Slightly later style weapons are depicted in other art in 'Weapons in Ancient China' were swordsmen fight halberdiers. The sword was not taken off the battlefield after the Han dynasty. The Han ring pommeled dao is used up untill around 500ad and is shown to be used in battle up untill that time since the swords were excellent weapons after generations of refinement.
The curved dao that occurs in China from about 500ad onwards, and was depicted in Tang art also, is a curving style sabre which is not a Chinese invention. These were adopted from either central Asian or Steppes horseman style blades and after this time the ancient style of dao goes out of use. I expect if I checked there would be seen on the battlefield too when conditions suited it....cavalry in particular.
It is Tang dynasty swords which influence the Japanese. In this way the curving form of sabre cannot be attributed unconditionally to Chinese even if the very high standard of sword making at the time can be.
The standard of steelwork in China was very high even in the earlier Han dynasty and the folded mid-carbon steel blades the Japanese are credited with clearly owe some debt to centuries of Chinese sword making before them.
m707
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Aug 30 2006, 09:10 AM) [snapback]4843535[/snapback]
Technically, those are not names. Those are words. But the dao and jian are the most common one. Any more specific and it would be the type of dao or jian in question


So is it safe to say when the words dao and jian are spoken you immediately associate it with chinese swords ? Can the same be said for saber and daggers, were these words invented only for the chinese swords? eg you would not use saber for arab swords.

QUOTE(Kenneth @ Aug 30 2006, 04:28 PM) [snapback]4843622[/snapback]
I would need to clarify a couple of Wujiangs points.
The ancient Chinese did not invent the first sword, although they invented their own types of swords and did so independently. They are sometimes influenced in part by outside cultures on occasion although unique Chinese styles can be found nowhere else. I am not sure what Wujiang meant by 'invented' but it is true Chinese forms such as the jian and some other early blades are independant inventions. Swords exist much earlier in basically similar double edged forms to jian in Europe and the 'near-East', occuring independently. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age_sword
There is no suggested connection between the regions weapons and the development and appearance of early Chinese swords show they come from shorter Chinese weapons like bronze double edged daggers and evolved over centuries into true bronze swords, and then later iron/steel swords.

The curved dao that occurs in China from about 500ad onwards, and was depicted in Tang art also, is a curving style sabre which is not a Chinese invention. These were adopted from either central Asian or Steppes horseman style blades and after this time the ancient style of dao goes out of use. I expect if I checked there would be seen on the battlefield too when conditions suited it....cavalry in particular.
It is Tang dynasty swords which influence the Japanese. In this way the curving form of sabre cannot be attributed unconditionally to Chinese even if the very high standard of sword making at the time can be.
The standard of steelwork in China was very high even in the earlier Han dynasty and the folded mid-carbon steel blades the Japanese are credited with clearly owe some debt to centuries of Chinese sword making before them.


Its interesting how they occur independently yet are similar in looks if you don't look at it in too much detail. By the way is a dagger more of a knife than a sword ?

I'm very interested in this curved aspect of the sword . What was the function of introducing the curve ?
When you say the curve style were adopted from central aisa , which current day countries are we talking about. Also who are the steppes horseman , are they the descendants of any modern race ?

thanks notworthy.gif
BlueDragonMagik
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Aug 30 2006, 08:10 AM) [snapback]4843535[/snapback]
Invented.
Technically, those are not names. Those are words. But the dao and jian are the most common one. Any more specific and it would be the type of dao or jian in question
Modern day swordplay are designed primarily for the liuyuedao. Any different 'styles' of swords would be more of a matter of adapting to using different types of swords. For example the wide and heavy podao or the tachi-infludence wodao.
Depends. Since the Han dynasty, it has been taken off the battlefield so soldiers doesn't use it. Even among civilians, most jianghu people don't prefer it either. The Jian was more prefer among the upper-class/educated class as the use of the jian are more complex thus more suited for those who are academics. The principles of swordsmanship could also be reflected onto other facts of life such as metaphysics and ethics. The jian was used as a symbol for both power and education. Most jiangs would carry a jian when commanding an army. The jian is the only weapon within teh chinese arsenal who has no negative image on it at all. Even the qiang can only say it isn't entirely negative.


Wujiang, ... I have two questions: What is Liuyuedao? How can the qiang possesses a negative image? ... I mean "what negative image do the qiang possesses?"
TMPikachu
Kenneth, on the curved swords. I've always heard they were probably a steppe nomad invention, but I thought the nature of being a nomad would make ironworking difficult.

Hmmm, actually I don't know much about nomad life. It would seem illogical to think that they did not produce their own metal weapons and had to rely on sedentary civilizations in trade, but how portable is a smithy?
Wujiang
QUOTE(BlueDragonMagik @ Aug 30 2006, 10:06 PM) [snapback]4843751[/snapback]
Wujiang, ... I have two questions: What is Liuyuedao?




QUOTE
How can the qiang possesses a negative image? ... I mean "what negative image do the qiang possesses?"


the qiang doesn't have an negative image. In fact, the qiang has te most positive image second only to the jian. More often than not, the qiang as the king of weapons, was a symbol of leadership. But at the same time, it does, like the rest of the chinese arsenal, have a certain ominous aura to it. The jian is the only weapon that doesn't have this connotation.
Yang Zongbao
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Aug 31 2006, 11:09 AM) [snapback]4843971[/snapback]

the qiang doesn't have an negative image. In fact, the qiang has te most positive image second only to the jian. More often than not, the qiang as the king of weapons, was a symbol of leadership. But at the same time, it does, like the rest of the chinese arsenal, have a certain ominous aura to it. The jian is the only weapon that doesn't have this connotation.


*allowing for discussion room

Although Wujiang's dao is also called by some to be the Niuwei Dao, while a slimmer one with no flare is often called the Liuye Dao.
Kenneth
QUOTE
m707 Posted Yesterday, 09:43 PM ;
I'm very interested in this curved aspect of the sword . What was the function of introducing the curve ?
When you say the curve style were adopted from central aisa , which current day countries are we talking about. Also who are the steppes horseman , are they the descendants of any modern race ?
A curved blade in a cutting action is improved over a straight blade since the blade naturally drags at the cut even with a simple swing. The mechanics of this can be felt but handling sabres and katana (and cutting with them). The curved blade is also suited to a horseman since it can thrust and not be stuck in the body the same way as a straight sword if used from a mounted position. In this way it has been associated with steppes horsemen originally although Turkic origins are possible. Thomas Chen (who isnt often here much anymore it seems) could give more specifics or a final answer. The development of weapons after the Han dynasty is not an area I have put much attention on and these curved swords I tend to associate more with comparitively 'late' dynasties. By the Song times most of the types of 'modern' style Chinese swords and weapons that are used have already appeared but naming them and identifying each is more for a modern martial artist or broader sword historians area.


QUOTE(TMPikachu @ Aug 31 2006, 12:16 AM) [snapback]4843786[/snapback]

Kenneth, on the curved swords. I've always heard they were probably a steppe nomad invention, but I thought the nature of being a nomad would make ironworking difficult.

Hmmm, actually I don't know much about nomad life. It would seem illogical to think that they did not produce their own metal weapons and had to rely on sedentary civilizations in trade, but how portable is a smithy?

The life of a nomad was not as backwards as might be thought. Although Sima Qian has been praised for being the 'first' anthropological account of another peoples by his writings on the Xiongnu it seems aspects of what he wrote must rely on hearsay and bias of the times. On specific aspects he has been found to be actually wrong. It just goes to show that such ancient histories are no more credible than many modern histories (if not more so) and should not be taken alone as a final word or complete. Even sites in East Zhou and Han times included true settlements. Settlements as focuses of production existed even in ancient China so the later steppes people would also have centres to produce weapons if need be.
http://xiongnu.boom.ru/review.htm
QUOTE
ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE XIONGNU: NEW DISCOVERIES IN RUSSIA
Dr. Sergey Minyaev
Institute of the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.

The Xiongnu (Huns of Asia) headed a powerful alliance of cattle-breeding tribes during the late 3rd-early 2nd century B.C., and dominated the eastern part of Central Asia for two centuries, laying the foundations for the emergence of tribal alliances there in the Middle Ages. The military and political history of the Xiongnu has been well documented in Chinese texts, but their civilization, culture, and art have remained relatively obscure. Chinese written sources testified: "The Xiongnu had no towns, no settlements, no agriculture, they could not sow, and they were only hunters." The first Xiongnu sites were discovered in 1896 by the anthropologist J. D. Talko-Grinzevich in the area around Kyachta, now in the Buryatia Republic, Russian Federation. A subsequent expedition led by P. K. Kozlov excavated several barrows in the Noin-Ula area of Outer Mongolia between 1924 and 1925. These tombs held a rich hoard of silver vessels, carpets and jade objects. Repeatedly studied and published, these finds have until recently defined the typical forms of Xiongnu art. Only in recent years have some Xiongnu sites in the Trans-Baikal area been thoroughly excavated.
The most detailed information comes from the lvolga complex, composed of a large fortress, a small fortification and a cemetery, all excavated by Prof. A. Davydova. The complex is situated 16 km from Ulan-Ude, in the Selenga Valley. The size of the large fortress is 350 m. from north to south and 200 m. from east to west. The fortress was surrounded by defence ramparts, which were between 35 and 38 m. in width. In the southern part of the space enclosed by the ramparts, an area of 7.000 sq. m. was revealed, yielding 51 dwellings, mostly semi-subterranean, and 600 pits. Each house featured a fireplace of stone slabs in the north-eastern corner. Trie only surface building ("a house of a chief') was situated in the centre of the site. The site was built according to a plan, with dwellings arranged in rows, organized in blocks and separated by long ditch-like pits. Several finds from dwellings and pits suggested that the inhabitants of the site were engaged in agriculture, cattle-breeding, minting and fishing, and that their occupations included metalwork in iron, bronze, and precious metals. Various art objects with animal patterns and geometrical designs were found in the fortress. At the lvolga burial ground, 216 graves were excavated. Remains of clothing were preserved, and bronze plates made in the so-called "Ordos style" and unique types or beads were found.
Large-scale excavations have also been conducted on the Dureny-1 settlement (led by Prof. A. Davydova), where Ivolga-type dwellings and artefacts were found, demonstrating that their inhabitants were agriculturists, herdsmen, and craftsmen. This extended settlement spreads for II km along the Chikoy River. About 5 000 sq. m. were excavated. Besides ornaments of various types, a unique bronze seal with a representation of a mountain goat was found.

&
QUOTE
The discovery of fortresses and settlements of the Xiongnu reveals a complex economic structure. The Ivolga fortress, the Dureny settlement and the other fortresses and settlements of the Xiongnu constitute incipient forms of town, or "proto-towns", whose inhabitants were engaged for the first time in agriculture and metallurgy. Chinese written sources also refer to these Xiongnu towns. Sima Qian refers to tnem in passing as, "Xiongnu constructed a town for keeping the grain". But Ban Gu describes in more detail. In the Han shu, chapter 70, there is the description of the capital of the Zizi shanyu (chief). This description matches the construction of the lvolga fortress.
Here lie two contradictions: first, between the archaeological evidence and the written sources, i.e., between the existence of the Ivolga fortress and the sentence, "the Xiongnu had no towns"; and second, between the written sources themselves wherein the the same phrase reads, "the Xiongnu had no towns" from the Shi Ji and the description of the capital of Zizi shanyu in the Han Shu. The archaeological evidence obviously demands a re-examination of the written source. The 110th chapter of Shi Ji by Sima Qian entitled Xiongnu Liezhuan is the main source for Xiongnu history. This chapter could be divided into two parts. The first part focuses on the nomads, predecessors (not ancestors) of the Xiongnu in Central Asia, from ancient times until the end of the third century B.C, who "had no the towns". The second part of chapter 110 is the history of the Xiongnu tribes themselves. It is in this part that Sima Qian comments: "Xiongnu constructed a town for keeping the grain."
As such, the period when the Xiongnu empire existed in Central Asia represented the first step of the urbanization of areas previously characterized by nomadism............The causes for the urbanization of the Xiongnu were complex but apart from military strategy, the principal cause might have been economic necessity. The great nomadic empire in fact occupied a vast territory and cattle breeding alone, the principal nomadic economic mainstay, could not provide the empire with the necessary products. The empire needed the balance of several kinds of production.
BlueDragonMagik
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Aug 31 2006, 09:09 AM) [snapback]4843971[/snapback]

the qiang doesn't have an negative image. In fact, the qiang has te most positive image second only to the jian. More often than not, the qiang as the king of weapons, was a symbol of leadership. But at the same time, it does, like the rest of the chinese arsenal, have a certain ominous aura to it. The jian is the only weapon that doesn't have this connotation.


Thanks a lot ... I like that photo. ... Now, it makes sense. ... After surfing the site, I am going to spend a lot of my spare time learning more about the history of Chinese weapons. ...
Kenneth
This is from Thomas's website;
This type of saber was used by Mongol cavalry in the Yuan army and was the ancestor of the Ming and Qing dynasties' willow leaf and goosequill sabers (liuyedao and yanmaodao).

QUOTE
Turko-Mongol saber; http://thomaschen.freewebspace.com/catalog.html
Originating from Central Asia around the 8th century, these sabers were widely used by the Turkic peoples of the Central Asian region and by the Mongols. It was to become the ancestor of the saber styles of the Arab/Islamic world, Persia, India and Eastern Europe as well, spreading to these regions as a consequence of Mongol-initated wars, conquests and rule.


The influence of this sword spread with the Mongol conquests and was adopted by cultures in the near East and the Far East (i.e http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talwar). Curving swords did exist earlier although Chinese dao of even the Tang era were not curved in the style we might consider as one characteristic of a sabre (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabre). The existence of sabre-like weapons from around the 8th century is noted by Thomas. In Muslim motifs the 'sword of the prophet' is often shown as a true scimitar and such a dating makes this 8th century date possible although later Muslim swords which commerorate this are modern representations only.
That the Tang would be influenced by central Asian or nomadic peoples swords is likely as it was a very cosmopolitian time where representations of foreigners and foreign animals and the movement of traders and merchants (inc. Persians & Arabs) were all features of the age. http://www.silk-road.com/artl/tang.shtml
&
QUOTE
Foreign envoys were regular visitors to the Tang court, carrying gifts and tribute of Türkic, Uighur, Tocharian,Sogdian and Iranian origin
http://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/exhib...ang/essay1.html
With the success of Mongol warriors it seems the influence of the sword style was spread across the Eurasian contenient.
m707
QUOTE(Kenneth @ Aug 31 2006, 04:32 PM) [snapback]4844014[/snapback]
A curved blade in a cutting action is improved over a straight blade since the blade naturally drags at the cut even with a simple swing. The mechanics of this can be felt but handling sabres and katana (and cutting with them). The curved blade is also suited to a horseman since it can thrust and not be stuck in the body the same way as a straight sword if used from a mounted position. http://xiongnu.boom.ru/review.htm

&



Yep that makes a lot of sense, the slicing and jabbing action works better with a
curved blade. One more question in regards to wearing a sword. Most of the time
I've seen illustrations of it being worn around the waist , but sometimes I've seen it
strap to the back. Are there any particular reasons for the different styles. Does it have
to do with preference of the swordsman or more with the size/weight/built of the sword ? g.gif
Yun
QUOTE
Can the same be said for saber and daggers, were these words invented only for the chinese swords? eg you would not use saber for arab swords.
Saber and dagger are not Chinese words at all. The Chinese word for a saber is dao 刀 (although a saber is usually curved while a dao need not be), and the word for dagger is bishou 匕首. Saber derives from a French word, which derives from a German word, which derives from a Hungarian word. Dagger derives from an Old French word which may derive from Vulgar Latin. This is according to the Online Etymology Dictionary http://www.etymonline.com/index.php :

QUOTE
"single-edged sword," 1680, from Fr. sabre "heavy, curved sword" (17c.), alteration of sable (1640), from Ger. Sabel, probably ult. from Hung. szablya "saber," lit. "tool to cut with," from szabni "to cut." The Slavic words (cf. Rus. sablya, Polish szabla "sword, saber") are perhaps also from Ger. It. sciabla seems to be directly from Hungarian.


QUOTE
1375, apparently from O.Fr. dague "dagger," from O.Prov. dague, of uncertain origin, perhaps from V.L. *daca "Dacian knife," from the Roman province in modern Romania. The ending is possibly the faintly pejorative -ard suffix.
Arab curved swords are usually called scimitars, but that word is not Arab or Turkish, and seems to have appeared in French and Italian out of nowhere. It may come from the Persian word for a sword, shamshir/shimshir:

QUOTE
1548, from M.Fr. cimeterre (15c.) or It. scimitarra, of uncertain origin. Turkish would be the expected source, but no such word has been found there. Perhaps from Pers. shimshir (pronounced "shamsher," cf. Gk. sampsera "a barbarian sword," from this source), but OED finds this "unsatisfactory as to form." Many early variations; the modern spelling is from influence of the It. form of the word.


To add to the confusion, the ancient Persian word shamshir eventually became synonymous with the scimitar-type curved saber after the Persians switched to using such sabers, even though the original Persian shamshir was straight and double-edged.

The real Arab word for sword is Sayf or Saif, and early Arab swords were (contrary to stereotype) straight-bladed and double-edged like a jian. The curved 'scimitar' weapon charge.gif was introduced by Turkic nomads around the late 8th century, roughly at the time it also appears in one case in Tang China (namely a figurine from the tomb of eunuch-general Yang Sixu, mid-8th century). But Arabs actually continued to use mainly straight swords for several centuries after that, and it was only with increasing Turkish influence in the Middle East that they gradually switched.

[This means my Syed character in the RPG would be quite unusual for using a 'scimitar' in AD 753.]
TMPikachu
I know that Tang dynasty had a great influence on Japanese sword making, but I've read that the curved katana was something the Japanese developed independently.

Is it possible that, through trade with the Tang, central asian style curved swords reached Japan?
m707
QUOTE(Yun @ Sep 1 2006, 08:51 AM) [snapback]4844299[/snapback]
Saber and dagger are not Chinese words at all. The Chinese word for a saber is dao 刀 (although a saber is usually curved while a dao need not be), and the word for dagger is bishou 匕首. Saber derives from a French word, which derives from a German word, which derives from a Hungarian word. Dagger derives from an Old French word which may derive from Vulgar Latin. This is according to the Online Etymology Dictionary http://www.etymonline.com/index.php :
Arab curved swords are usually called scimitars, but that word is not Arab or Turkish, and seems to have appeared in French and Italian out of nowhere. It may come from the Persian word for a sword, shamshir/shimshir:
To add to the confusion, the ancient Persian word shamshir eventually became synonymous with the scimitar-type curved saber after the Persians switched to using such sabers, even though the original Persian shamshir was straight and double-edged.

The real Arab word for sword is Sayf or Saif, and early Arab swords were (contrary to stereotype) straight-bladed and double-edged like a jian. The curved 'scimitar' weapon charge.gif was introduced by Turkic nomads around the late 8th century, roughly at the time it also appears in one case in Tang China (namely a figurine from the tomb of eunuch-general Yang Sixu, mid-8th century). But Arabs actually continued to use mainly straight swords for several centuries after that, and it was only with increasing Turkish influence in the Middle East that they gradually switched.

[This means my Syed character in the RPG would be quite unusual for using a 'scimitar' in AD 753.]


Thanks for the interesting /complicated history of the word saber.
Moping4U
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Aug 31 2006, 04:09 PM) [snapback]4843971[/snapback]



According to Thomas Chen's site, this niuwei dao is only used by militia and civilians.

The Liuye and yanmao dao were used by the military.
Wujiang
No, the Liuyuedao as shown was never employed my the military.

The yaodao and peidao were the most common of military swords
urofpersia
QUOTE(Yun @ Sep 1 2006, 10:51 PM) [snapback]4844299[/snapback]
[This means my Syed character in the RPG would be quite unusual for using a 'scimitar' in AD 753.]


And in my description of Shah to the GM, I mentioned he used 2 straight shortswords of Persian design. ;-)
Moping4U
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Sep 10 2006, 10:56 AM) [snapback]4846791[/snapback]
No, the Liuyuedao as shown was never employed my the military.

The yaodao and peidao were the most common of military swords


But that isn't a liuyedao. It's a niuweidao, is it not?
Wujiang
Not by my findings it isn't
Yang Zongbao
Perhaps an agreement to disagree between Thomas Chen and Wujiang's beliefs should be enacted.
CARDINAL009
QUOTE(WangEnlai @ Sep 10 2006, 11:35 AM) [snapback]4846841[/snapback]
Using a jian or dao how do you break a jian or dao?


q: Pls. define what do you mean by breaking a jian or a dao?
WangEnlai
From snapping/dulling the blade and/or seperating the blade from handle & hilt.

(Practical & Impractical [aka. Freak accident])
CARDINAL009
Had a brain freeze when asking that question.
TMPikachu
QUOTE(Wujiang @ Sep 10 2006, 06:56 AM) [snapback]4846791[/snapback]
No, the Liuyuedao as shown was never employed my the military.

The yaodao and peidao were the most common of military swords



Wujiang, did you ever make a thread that just has a big list with images of all these sword types?
Yun
Yes, the thread is here: http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php...c=8538&st=0

However, it was controversial because not everyone agreed with Wujiang's identifications. A lot of it revolved around the difference between liuyedao and niuweidao.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.