QUOTE(Boarhuntr @ Oct 13 2005, 12:56 AM) [snapback]4764834[/snapback]
Many American Hmong are rather clueless as to their Chinese origins. In fact, on many Hmong boards they are continually asking where they're from. Some day from the Yellow River area; some actually say they're Mongolian in origin. I used to question their claims about Mongolian roots, but after reading Ming dynasty history I found out it's very plausible that many of the Hmong have Mongolian blood. When Zhu Yuan Zhang overthrew the Mongol dynasty a remanant of Mongolian forces holed up in the mountains of Yunnan. ZYZ son Zhu Dhi, (the future Yongle Emperor) was given the task of fighting the Mongols and ridding China of their remnants. Zhu Dhi and his generals massacred a lot of Mongols, along with many mountain tribes, including the Miao. Assuming this annihilation campagin took several decades, it is logical to deduce that the Mongol soldiers may very well have taken local women as their wives, hence the claim on the part of the Hmong concerning their Mongol roots.
Never knew that.. But that may be spurious claim just beacuse
Hmong and
Mongol are similar in sound (and both Asian).
QUOTE
In fact, when one sees a lot of Hmong at their New Year's festivals, you will notice that some of their men are big bodied and tall, unlike most of the Hmong who are short and wiry. I'm not talking just about height, but also girth. The big bodied Hmong also have northern Chinese or Mongolian features, long bony faces, single eyelids (mongolian eyefold), and generally have smaller looking eyes than the typical SE Asian.
Big bodied/tall/fat all are affected by diet.

Also what 'Northern Chinese/Mongolian' features are you talking about? Most Mongolians I saw don't look like North Chinese.
QUOTE
I think all Chinese play Mahjong, not just Cantonese. In Taiwan my aunts and uncles often play MJ, often all night long, and they are Hunanese, not Cantonese.
I never saw Chinese playing Mahjong in front of me before I came to Hong Kong, so I agree with Ed Ziomek. Non-Europeans can also play poker cards everyday, so it's not strange that non-Cantonese also play it.
QUOTE(xng @ Oct 13 2005, 08:40 AM) [snapback]4764905[/snapback]
For me, as long as two languages have a lot of things in common, ethnically similar (eg. north mongoloid which come from related group of tribes ages ago), they should be classified in the same language family.
How about Turkey's Turk, Kazakh and Mongolian? They are in the same Altaic family.
QUOTE
The characteristics of sino-tibetan are:
1. Tonal and monosyllabic
2. Classifier
3. Significant amount of shared vocabulary
4. Similar sounds (chen, chan, tan, tran)
5. Simple grammar (no past/present tense, gender nouns, verb changes like in indo-european languages)
6. Ethnically similar ?
The russian language and english are much more different than the difference between miao and sino languages and yet those two belongs to indo-european.
Do you ever know how Miao language is? Many basic words cannot be found in Chinese, just a lot of loanwords. From a few examples it's not enough but you see this is similar: English 'brother' Russian 'брат'('brat') , just because Russian have different script does not mean they are very different. Also, one can say complex grammar, ethnically similar, no classifier, non-tonal and only few words are monosyllabic etc. are the characteristics of both Russian and English.