Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Buddhist Caves
China History Forum, Chinese History Forum > CHF Activities Center > CHF Gallery and Museum
Publius
Buddhist caves are archeological clues that help to sort though the merge from Indian Mahayana Buddhism to a more Chinese Mahayana Buddhism. The other obvious trail that helps identify this trend is the translations of the various sutras where we can read how certain questions were debated and how the solutions to those questions were ascertained. I find the caves very interesting and will present some of the information and pictures available, but I will refrain from drawing any conclusions until I have a better grasp of the subject. Please feel free to contribute to the topic to help me gain a better understanding.

There are several motives behind cave carvings. First off, Mahayana cosmology is directly related to Buddha representations and the caves that house them. Reza wrote that “In this cosmology, an imaginary central axis runs through a Buddha as he sits in a cave within mythological Mount Meru, whose four sides are gold, lapis, silver, and crystal. There are an infinite number of these world systems, each with its own Buddha and Mount Meru. Highly evolved spiritual beings live on the mountain’s four terraces. A progression of 16 heavens starts at the pinnacle of Meru, while at its base are mountains of gold and the continents, including Jambudvipa, the everyday human realm. Below are the eight hot hells and eight cold hells; their residents have a chance to escape in their next incarnation if they have a chance to escape in their next incarnation if they have advanced toward enlightenment. NO one is irredeemable. Once a being achieves enlightenment, there is no need to be reborn” (National Geographic, April 1996, p58).

And particularly in China, Buddhism, under the Pure Land traditions, allowed people to reach Nirvana through meritorious deeds. Constructing images of the Buddha and temple building was one such deed.

Cave Temples


Yungang Caves

Hanging Monastery
Publius
The Yungang, which means “Cloud Hill,” caves were etched into the Wuzhoushan sandstone escarpment between 460 AD (some say 453 AD), during Wen Cheng’s reign, and 524, during Xiao Ming’s reign. The caves are 16 km west of Datong and already had a predecessor in Dunhuang, where Buddhists had already established a strong presence.

The people who worked on the Yungang caves were not limited by class or status. Groups of villagers carved, nuns and monks, and even the Imperial Household sponsored worked. China.org notes that over 40,000 people, some from Sri Lanka, worked on the caves.

China.org also describes the artistic content of Yungang:
QUOTE
The 53 grottoes in Yungang Grottos include some 1,000 niches with about 51,000 statues – a treasure-trove of cave art that combines traditional Chinese art forms with foreign influence, particularly Greek and Indian.


These caves are numbered 1 through 20 based on their east to west orientation. James O. Caswell differentiates two “major cave building phases at Yungang: the imperial caves (Caves 16-20), ca. 460-467, and after a hiatus of some 16 years nonimperial caves (Caves 5-13), from ca. 483 to no later than 494” (Archeology, September/October 1996).

The caves have been charted and have been assigned numbers: 1 – 20.

Caves 16 – 20 were the first caves to be excavated after Tanyao, the head of the Buddhist church in the court of the Northern Wei Dynasty, petitioned the emperor Wencheng to “open up five caves and carve a Buddha image in each of them, the tallest to be 70 feet high, the next tallest 60 feet high, with superb carvings and decorations, a crowning glory to the world” (Treatise on Buddhism and Daoism, History of the Northern Wei, p. 63). Some speculate that Wencheng built the caves to atone for the Buddhist persecutions under Taiwu (423-452). Kenneth Chen notes that the “five Buddhas in these caves represented the five previous Emperors”: Taizu, Taizong, Shizu, Gongzong, and Gaozong, though some believe that the large Buddha in Cave 20 represents Wencheng.

Japanese scholars Mizuno and Nagahira believed that these large Buddhas were modeled after the Bamiyan Buddhas. Chen gives the example that the Buddhas “in Cave 18 are clothed in thin robes which cling to the body—a feature also found in the Bamiyan Buddhas” (169). Caswell notes that the Buddha in Cave 18 is clothed in the Chinese scholar’s dress. Also, the Buddha’s hair style in Cave 16 is similar to the Gandharan Buddha’s wavy hair. The colossal Buddha figure is of the Udayana type, with “extended earlobes (indicative of his princely heritage when he wore heavy earrings) and the usina, a protuberance on the top of his head suggesting his extraordinary intelligence” in Cave 20 has a 13 feet high head (Caswell 2).

Cave 16


Cave 16


Cave 16 North Wall


Cave 16 North Wall


Cave 16 Sayamuni


Cave 16 Sayamuni


Cave 16: Sakyamuni Buddha


Cave 16: Worshipper’s images on the exterior wall of auxiliary cave



Cave 17


Cave 17 North Wall Ceiling


Cave 17 North Wall


Cave 17 West Wall Niche

[img]http://img15.imagevenue.com/loc475/th_21373_C7248YungangCave17Maitr_122_475lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 17

Cave 18

[img]http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc574/th_21408_C7258YungangCve18NWaESiGrp_122_574lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 18 North Wall

[img]http://img107.imagevenue.com/loc359/th_21423_C7264aYungngCve18Entrnce_122_359lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 18 Entrance

[img]http://img160.imagevenue.com/loc537/th_24434_Cave_18,_figure_of_Sayamuni_122_537lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 18 Sayamuni

[img]http://img21.imagevenue.com/loc578/th_22720_Cave_18,_figure_of_Sayamuni_122_578lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 18: Figure of Sakyamuni

Cave 19
No images yet



Cave 20

[img]http://img37.imagevenue.com/loc368/th_23684_C7329YungangCave20Overview_122_368lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 Overview

[img]http://img162.imagevenue.com/loc489/th_23689_C7330YungangCave20CBudhDtHd_122_489lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 Buddha

[img]http://img162.imagevenue.com/loc544/th_23720_C7332YungangCave20CBudhDtRb_122_544lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 Buddha

[img]http://img34.imagevenue.com/loc448/th_23756_C7343Yungang20EWallFigure_122_448lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 East Wall Figure

[img]http://img120.imagevenue.com/loc366/th_23761_C7348Yungang20EWallVwTp_122_366lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 East Wall

[img]http://img144.imagevenue.com/loc504/th_24499_C7549LYg20HeadBuddhaNwall_122_504lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 Buddha

[img]http://img133.imagevenue.com/loc390/th_24529_C7555LYg20CelestialNwall_122_390lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20 Celestial

[img]http://img154.imagevenue.com/loc347/th_22732_caves20_22_figure_seated_in_the_dhyana_position_122_347lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 20: Fourteen meter high Buddha seated in the dhyana position
Publius
Caves 5-13 were carved with a different style. Caswell remarks that “They were the work of nonimperial patrons who dug cave-temples for religious rather than political reasons” (65). Here, many Buddhas, bodhisattvas, musicians, devas, apsaras and even donors were carved into the walls. The art from these caves are more Chinese in nature. Some of the iconography are more Chinese, e.g. dragons and phoenixes, and some of the Buddha’s have more Chinese characteristics. They have longer topknots and wear Chinese garb, especially in Cave 6. The scenes of Caves 9 and 10 illustrate the contents of two sutras translated by Daoyao and Kekaya. Chen describes that “one of these sutras describes the persecution of Buddhism by a king of Kashmir and the subsequent revival of the religion; it served to remind the Chinese Buddhists of their experiences suffered under Emperor Wu” (167)

The figure with five heads and six arms and is perched on a bird on the jambs of Cave 8 is a style probably derived from South Asia. Its counterpart on the opposing jamb has three heads and probably six arms and is seated side saddle on a bull. Caswell states “They may be Visnu and Siva respectively, though the iconography is by no means orthodox by Indian standards” (20). Similar, though stylistically different, figures have been found at Longmen. Collectively, these findings merit the question, was Verdic iconography purposely drawn into the Buddhist iconography, or was this incorporation merely accidental based on the observations from travelers to India?

Cave 5 and 6 are the most elaborately carved, depicting the entire Buddha legend: Buddha’s birth, the seven steps and the shout of victory, the nine dragons spitting water, the tests of strength with the Magadhan youths, the life of ease and the luxury in the palaces, the trips to the pleasure garden and the four signs, the great renunciation, the ride out of the city on his horse, the separation from Kanthaka, the life of asceticism in the forest, and the enlightenment.
Picture from this travel blog http://www.travelblog.org/Photos/584952.html

In cave 11, an inscription was sponsored by a whole group. They asked for “peace and prosperity for the realm, also prosperity, honor, and longevity for the ruling house. [. . .] the group prayed that their deceased ancestors and their teachers and all their relatives might be reborn in the Pure Land, and live there without blemish and be nurtured by the lotus. If these ancestors or teachers should be reborn again, may they become a deity or a human being with all their needs fulfilled. [. . .] the group prayed that all people in the village might from that time on be more faithful and sincere in their devotion to the Buddha, that they might be more diligent in spreading the religion, and that they might practice the career of the bodhisattva, thus to convert all sentient beings” (Chen 168). These sentiments were probably influenced by the Suvarnaprabhasa sutra.

Cave 5
No images yet

Cave 6


Cave 6 Stupa Uprights


Cave 7

Cave 7: Buddha meditating

Cave 8


Cave 8 Ceiling


Cave 8 Eastern Wall

Cave 8 North Wall Upper Niche



Cave 9


Cave 9 Antechamber


Cave 9 Antechamber


Cave 9 Antechamber


Cave 9 Antechamber


Cave 9 Shrine

[img]http://img13.imagevenue.com/loc474/th_16846_C7189Yungang9ShrinSWaESiMid_122_474lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 9 Shrine East Wall

[img]http://img136.imagevenue.com/loc405/th_16896_C7191Yungang9ShrinSWaDorTop_122_405lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 9 Shrine South Wall

[img]http://img128.imagevenue.com/loc589/th_16901_C7193Yungang9AChambNWaDrTop_122_589lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 9 Antechamber North Wall

[img]http://img105.imagevenue.com/loc371/th_24838_caves_9s_ceiling_122_371lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 9 Ceiling

[img]http://img120.imagevenue.com/loc446/th_22966_caves_9s_ceiling_122_446lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 9: Ceiling



Cave 10

[img]http://img21.imagevenue.com/loc350/th_17698_C7202Yungang10Entrance_122_350lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Entrance

[img]http://img14.imagevenue.com/loc429/th_17715_C7203Yungang10AChambNWaDetl_122_429lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Antechamber North Wall

[img]http://img21.imagevenue.com/loc574/th_17763_C7204Yungang10AChambNWaDrTp_122_574lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Antechamber North Wall Door Top

[img]http://img131.imagevenue.com/loc485/th_17773_C7202Yungang10Entrance_122_485lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Entrance

[img]http://img140.imagevenue.com/loc403/th_18734_C7203Yungang10AChambNWaDetl_122_403lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Antechamber North Wall

[img]http://img159.imagevenue.com/loc479/th_18740_C7204Yungang10AChambNWaDrTp_122_479lo.jpg[/img]
Cave 10 Antechamber North Wall
Publius
Cave 10 Continued:


Cave 10 Eight Celestials around Lotus Medallion

Cave 11

Cave 11 Façade

Cave 12


Cave 12 Worshippers’ images on the exterior wall


Cave 12

Cave 13


Cave 13 Mairteya
Publius
Other caves:


Yungang

Cave 1
No images yet

Cave 2
No images yet

Cave 3
No images yet

Cave 4
No images yet

Cave 14
No images yet

Cave 15

Cave 15

The images are from the Berger Foundation’s Yungang website, from Kaladarshan Arts at the Ohio State University, ]Scholarsresource.com, and from this blog. If any of these groups does not want their images posted on CHF, please contact me and I'll promptly remove them.

As of 2001, the Yungang caves are a World Heritage Site.
Publius
Caswell, Joseph. “The Significance of Local Styles in Northern Wei Buddhist Cave-Temples.” Oriental Art Volume 44, Issue 4 (1998): 19 – 29



Celli, N. “Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia, vol 1, Later Han, Three Kingdoms and Western Chin in China and Bactria to Shan-shan in Central Asia.” Central Asiatic Journal, Vol. 46, Number 1. 1955.



Ch’en, Kenneth. “Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey.” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.



Fong, MH. “Buddhist Cave Sculpture at Lung-Men.” Arts of Asia,Vol. 10, Issue 4 (1980): 82 – 88



James, Jean, M. “Some Iconographic Problems in Early Daoist-Buddhist Sculptures in China.” Archives of Asian Art Volume 42, (1989): 71 – 76



Reza. “Pilgrimage to China’s Buddhist Caves.” National Geographic April (1996): 58

poseph
You have some of your cave pic references wrong.

The most famous and photographed of the Yungang caves, the one you identified variously as as cave 1 & 2 in your 6:10 post, is actually cave 20.

Cave 3 is also famous, but not for its history. It houses 3 statues of a 10 meter Amitaba Buddha and 2 6 meter tall statues of 2 boddhisattvas. These statues dates from the Tang period. It is quite interesing to compare the more fuller figured style of these Tang period statuts against the Northern Wei styles.

For another, but very rarely visited site, try to look up Bingling Temple (1000 Buddhas in the Tibetan language). It is located close by Lanzhou in Gansu Province. It is one the earliest cave complex in China east of Xinjiang (dating from ~420AD). Its most famous cave is a 27 meter Maitreya Buddha. It is also the most closely resembling existing statues to the ones destroyed by the Taliban at Bamiyan.

The 27 meter Maitreya Buddha.



Another rarely visited site is Maijishan Grottoes (wheatstack mountain) outside of Tianshui, Gansu. This site dates from the late 4th century during the Later Qin period.
Publius
Sorry about that poseph. Error fixed.
naruwan
QUOTE(poseph @ Dec 9 2006, 04:29 AM) [snapback]4866534[/snapback]
You have some of your cave pic references wrong.

The most famous and photographed of the Yungang caves, the one you identified variously as as cave 1 & 2 in your 6:10 post, is actually cave 20.

Cave 3 is also famous, but not for its history. It houses 3 statues of a 10 meter Amitaba Buddha and 2 6 meter tall statues of 2 boddhisattvas. These statues dates from the Tang period. It is quite interesing to compare the more fuller figured style of these Tang period statuts against the Northern Wei styles.

For another, but very rarely visited site, try to look up Bingling Temple (1000 Buddhas in the Tibetan language). It is located close by Lanzhou in Gansu Province. It is one the earliest cave complex in China east of Xinjiang (dating from ~420AD). Its most famous cave is a 27 meter Maitreya Buddha. It is also the most closely resembling existing statues to the ones destroyed by the Taliban at Bamiyan.

The 27 meter Maitreya Buddha.



Another rarely visited site is Maijishan Grottoes (wheatstack mountain) outside of Tianshui, Gansu. This site dates from the late 4th century during the Later Qin period.


When i was young i was exposed to studies of these caves. Since back in my youth these caves weren't properly protected or regarded, some Taiwanese buddhist tried to take as many pictures as they could.

One thing about Mijisan, which was focused by this group of scholars, is that soon after they left, some construction flooded the area.

I am not sure if this is still true today. But from what I recall, the site is very impressive.

By the way, what signs are there to show your picture of Bingling temple that it's a Maitreya statue???

from it's appearance I'd guess build sometime around the 北齊 BeiQi or 北周 BeiZhou period?
poseph
The Maijishan Grottoes are quite a sight. The Tianshui area is the dry yellow earth area, but the surrounding hills are green. The mountain is especially nice as it is topped by a hair-like growth of green vegetation. It is also quote a climb to get to the grottoes and you basically climb up staircases attached to the side of the mountain.



I think the area is quite well protected now since it is the major tourist attraction in the area. But there is always the problem of water seppage at the site. The 2 largest buddhas there are made of compacted clay (as opposed to being hewn out of the rocks like Yungang, Longmen, Bingling). You should be able to pick out the 2 clay buddha complexes at the center and to the very left edge of the picture.

The picture of the Maitreya Buddha at Bingling actually dates from the Tang dynasty. I have not been to the site, so I don't know what is the basis for scientists to identify it as the Maitreya Buddha. But the Maitreya Budddha (the future buddha) is commonly depicted in the sitting position to signify that he has not yet attained full enlightenment.

The 420 AD site consists of the Mahasthamaprapta (?????) and Avalokitsevara (????) Bodhisattvas and the Amitayus Buddha (????). Most importantly its exact date is known because there is an inscription stating that it was made on the first year of Jian Hong in the Western Qin dynasty. As I said before, this inscripton is the earliest dated buddhist grottoe in China.

Here is a photo of the Amitayus Buddha.





naruwan
QUOTE(poseph @ Dec 10 2006, 08:36 AM) [snapback]4866691[/snapback]
The Maijishan Grottoes are quite a sight. The Tianshui area is the dry yellow earth area, but the surrounding hills are green. The mountain is especially nice as it is topped by a hair-like growth of green vegetation. It is also quote a climb to get to the grottoes and you basically climb up staircases attached to the side of the mountain.



I think the area is quite well protected now since it is the major tourist attraction in the area. But there is always the problem of water seppage at the site. The 2 largest buddhas there are made of compacted clay (as opposed to being hewn out of the rocks like Yungang, Longmen, Bingling). You should be able to pick out the 2 clay buddha complexes at the center and to the very left edge of the picture.

The picture of the Maitreya Buddha at Bingling actually dates from the Tang dynasty. I have not been to the site, so I don't know what is the basis for scientists to identify it as the Maitreya Buddha. But the Maitreya Budddha (the future buddha) is commonly depicted in the sitting position to signify that he has not yet attained full enlightenment.

The 420 AD site consists of the Mahasthamaprapta (?????) and Avalokitsevara (????) Bodhisattvas and the Amitayus Buddha (????). Most importantly its exact date is known because there is an inscription stating that it was made on the first year of Jian Hong in the Western Qin dynasty. As I said before, this inscripton is the earliest dated buddhist grottoe in China.

Here is a photo of the Amitayus Buddha.



ic, the face of the Bingling site is of Tang features, but judging from the cloth I thought it's an earlier piece. I guess it's just a retro-styled Tang sculpture. Perhaps to fit in with the surrounding statues?

Mahasthamaprapta is 大勢至 Da-Shi-Zhi Buddha

Avalokitsevara is 觀世音 Guan-Shi-Yin Bodhisattcas

Amitayus is the Tibetan written version of Amithaba Buddha?

Even though it might be the earliest Buddha Grottoe in china, however, if the Amitayus statue is from the grottoe, it's a very late addition to the grottoe. That style of Buddha statue (tibetan) didn't exist in China until early 15th century.
Publius
Here's some information and pictures of the famous Longmen Caves. http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/luoyang/longmenindex.htm

The Longmen Caves were being chisled throughout the Northern Wei Dynasty, beginning with Emperor Xuanwu. Similar to the Yungang caves, "Emperors, officials, monks, and laymen, all participated in the project [. . .]" (Chen 170). Though, Caswell believes that "no imperial caves were completed at Longmen" because the aesthetics are different, e.g. the Yungang figures are more rounded (18-19). Work was continued through the Sui and Tang dynasties until Emperor Xuantong's reign (713-755) and maybe in the Song.

The Japanese scholar Tsukamoto Zenryu drew a table showing when and how many images were carved:

Date.............................Images...................Date.........................Images.......................Date.........Images
495-500........................7............................570-580....................11...............................650-660...141
500-510........................59..........................580-590.....................1................................660-670...93
510-520........................51..........................590-600.....................1................................670-680...59
520-530........................65..........................600-610.....................0................................680-690...77
530-540........................40..........................610-620.....................3................................690-700...45
540-550........................6............................620-630.....................0................................700-710...61
550-560........................6............................630-640.....................5................................710-720...24
560-570........................6............................640-650.....................66..............................720-730....6

and created two other charts using inscriptions that recorded the deity carved:

Deity........................Dated............Undated ..................Total
Amitabha..................133...............89...........................222
Avalokitesvara...........82................115.........................197
Sakyamuni................61.................33...........................94
Maitreya....................49.................13...........................62
Kshitigarbha...............11.................22...........................33
Bhaishajyaguru...........3..................12...........................15
Mahasthamaprapta......2...................3............................5

Date.......Sakyamuni....Maitreya...Amitabha...Avalokitesvara
.................................(Mile)........(Amituo)....(Guanyin)
500.........---................3.............---..............---
510.........14................10............---...............1
520.........11................11.............1................3
530.........11................8...............6................10
540.........7..................3...............1................8
650.........---................2..............11...............6
660.........5..................4...............40..............18
670.........---................1...............26..............5
680.........---................3...............11..............7
690.........3..................1...............15..............8
700.........---................1...............9................8
710.........2..................---.............6................4
720.........---................---.............2................4


I believe that this information is VERY interesting and could elucidate varying ideologies between specific Emperor reigns and Dynastic changes, e.g. Sakyamuni and Maitreya were popular during the Northern Wei while Amitabha and Avalokitesvara were popular during the Tang. The popularity of Maitreya is in accordance with the large number of Maitreya sutras available and because of influential monks, such as Daoan. I will leave further conjecture to others or for a later time…

Kenneth Chen divides the inscriptions in the Longmen caves into three groups:
1. Those set by the ruling class, e.g. the imperial family, officials, or the literati
2. By religious societies under the leadership of some Buddhist monk
3. By monks and nuns who were leaders of the Luoyang Buddhist community (173)

And he further summarized the motives behind the inscriptions: "(1) to acquire merits leading to rebirth in the Pure Land of Amitabha or the Tushita Heaven of Maitreya; (2) to attain bodhi or enlightenment; (3) to thank the Buddha for the fulfillment of certain wishes; (4) to obtain certain material benefits, such as wealth, position, longevity, et cetera; (5) to express gratitude for recovery from illness; (6) to assure success in a military campaign" (176).

Longmen Cave 19, Faxian Si, Tang Dynasty, Reign of Emperor Gaozong, Second Year of Shangyuan Era, AD 675:


South View







Overview of West Wall


Overview of North Wall

Longmen Cave 3, Binyang Zhongdong(Middle Cave), Northern Wei Dynasty, First Quarter of the 6th Century

Entrance to cave 3, Binyang Zhongdong:







Binyang Zhongdong Middle Cave
Publius
more from Cave 19:






Binyang Zhongdong Middle Cave


Middle Register of Entrance to Interior of the East Wall
Publius
Guyang and Binyang are two of the most known Longmen caves.

Guyang is believed to be the first cave and contains inscriptions from seven members of the ruling family, eleven by monks, seven by nuns, and six by religious societies. Corresponding to the aforementioned chart, Sakyamuni and Maitreya were the deities most often sculpted.

The Binyang cave has many sculptures sponsored by the imperial family with “images of emperors and empresses advancing to pay their respects to the Buddha, presented in a sitting posture flanked by two bodhisattvas, Maitreya and Prabhutaratna, and by two monks, Ananda and Kasyapa” (Chen 176).

Cave 3, Binyang, North Wall of Interior:

North Group Overview


Group at the Interior of the North Wall


Bodhisattva at the Interior of the North Wall


Bodhisattva Head at the Interior of the North Wall


Left Attendant Bodhisattva

Cave 3, Binyang, South Wall of Interior:

Overview of the South Group with Standing Buddha and Attendant Figures


In Middle Cave


Central Buddha in Middle Cave


Right Middle Cave Attendant Group


View of the South Group, Left Attendant Figures
Publius
Cave 3, Binyang, West Wall of Interior:

Central Buddha


Detail of the Buddha in the Interior West Wall


Detail of Lion to the Right of Buddha’s Throne


Detail of Altar Table in the Interior of West Wall


Detail of Right Attendant Bodhisattva and Monk Ananda


Detail of Right Attendant Bodhisattva


Detail of Right attendant Monk Ananda


Detail of Right Attendant Monk Ananda
Publius
Cave 3, Binyang, West Wall of Interior continued:


Detail of Left Attendant Bodhisattva and Monk Kasyapa


Detail of Left Attendant Bodhisattva’s Left Hand


Detail of Left Attendant Bodhisattva’s Right Hand


Detail of Left Attendant Monk Kasyapa


Lotus Ceiling

Publius
What I've learned through Yungang and Longmen Buddhist art:

Though both the Yungang and Longmen caves most often portrayed Sakyamuni and Maitreya during the Northern Wei, they had their differences. Yungang carvings were more concerned with biographical details describing an earthly sage; in contrast, the Longmen carvings were more concerned with the Buddha’s enlightenment by means of merits. In Yungang, the Buddha and the emperor were closely linked, following the belief that the ruler was the Tathagata, while the Longmen caves portrayed the Buddha as the savior of all mankind and as a source of exemplary dharma. This explains why so many inscriptions were concerned with the well-being of the emperor and the ruling house. Under the influence of Maitreya Buddhism, they believed that there was a close relationship between the emperor, a peaceful future, salvation, and even the earthly return of Buddha.

The inscriptions also emphasize Mahayana Buddhism in that compassion and virtue were paramount. Also, there were no class divisions or exclusion between the worshippers. The Mahayana beliefs allowed for “selfish” prayers to guiltlessly be inscribed and for elements of filial piety to pervade Chinese, Buddhist thought. Hinayana was too individualistic and strict to allow for such benevolence or social constructs. Chen wrote that during the “Northern Wei Dynasty Buddhism was finally able to reach large numbers of common people and to hold their attention. For the previous Wei Chin [Qin] era, there is an adequate amount of information about the acceptance of the religion among the educated circles, the gentry, and the nobility, but very little about its reception among the masses of people” (179). Essentially, the upper class, the literati, needed to translate and disseminate different Buddhist ideologies before the masses could embrace Buddhism.

Please me know what you think.

Caswell, Joseph. “The Significance of Local Styles in Northern Wei Buddhist Cave-Temples.” Oriental Art Volume 44, Issue 4 (1998): 19 – 29

Celli, N. “Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia, vol 1, Later Han, Three Kingdoms and Western Chin in China and Bactria to Shan-shan in Central Asia.” Central Asiatic Journal, Vol. 46, Number 1. 1955.

Ch’en, Kenneth. “Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey.” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.

Fong, MH. “Buddhist Cave Sculpture at Lung-Men.” Arts of Asia,Vol. 10, Issue 4 (1980): 82 – 88

James, Jean, M. “Some Iconographic Problems in Early Daoist-Buddhist Sculptures in China.” Archives of Asian Art Volume 42, (1989): 71 – 76

Reza. “Pilgrimage to China’s Buddhist Caves.” National Geographic April (1996): 58
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.