QUOTE
The Japanese had problems with the aboriginals because they tried to change them. Forbidding head hunting was done by the Japanese. Then they met further resistance when they tried start chopping down the Cypress forests. Without the Japanese doing all these work, I think KMT would be in for big a** whopping and shocked when they try to venture into the mountains and rip the resources like they did during the entire 50s to 80s.
I.E.
Without the prior Japanese massacres, displacement, establishment of resource extraction infrastructures and displays of force the KMT would have a more difficult time. But the KMT would succeed, regardless, in displacing the natives. It would just take a longer time. They have no qualms shooting people in the street, and they would have no qualms killing people in other places.
And the blame would lie squarely on the KMT waishengren again for destroying Taiwanese culture.
But no, history didn't go that way.
But IMO, taking advantage of the aborigines is more of an ingrained notion of innate superiority over natives.
The very pragmatic theory that city builders would prevail over hunter gatherers.
And the fact that these people have chosen to resign to their fates to guard their cultural distinctiveness.
Over time, perhaps within the next half a century, all we know would be on books, photographs and videos.
Its already an irreversible decline. We keep them as we keep pets.
We allow a group of people to live their indigenous way of lives, and keep them as a cultural exhibit.
Just as how the CCP maintain a body of lamas to pray in their temples.
To be pragmatic, they'll never have their land back, nor their original way of life, nor any design of improvement.
They're relics of human cultures, stuck in history for our own amusement, the city builders.