QUOTE
Some of the Yue people were sinificised and mixed with the Han-chinese. Some of the Yue people became the ancestors of today's "Gao Shan" ethnic
(高山族) in Taiwan. Another Yue faction became today's "Dai" ethnic (傣族) in southern China. Others became today's "Zhuang" ethnic (壮族), "Bu Yi" ethnic (布依族), "Tong" ethnic (侗族), "Shui" ethnic (水族) in Southern China.
Basically, today's "Zhuang" ethnic (壮族) and "Tong" ethnic (侗族) in South China were related to the polynesian people in south-east asia.
GZ. have you heard of the Austronesians, who were also mentioned by Cheapfujianese? They're the prehistoric inhabitants of south China and Taiwan, who spread throughout Southeast Asia and are now mainly represented by the Taiwanese aboriginal peoples, the Malays and the Filipinos. When you said "Polynesian", I think what you actually meant is "Austronesian".
Here's an introduction to the Austronesians from the lecture notes of the history course "China and Southeast Asia" that I took last semester. After reading it, I'd like to ask you guys a question that has been on my mind for a while: Are the Austronesians the same as the Bai Yue? Or a different people who were displaced from south China by the Bai Yue?
The Austronesians
• Today, Austronesian peoples comprise the majority of the indigenous populations in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Madagascar. Some in Burma, some on Hainan, along the coast of Papua and through Melanesia, to all of the Pacific islands.
• The debate continues as to whether there are any biological links between all these people who are linked by the same language family, but generally accepted that the spread of the language was by migration, by colonizing speakers not by borrowing.
• The general consensus is that Austronesian peoples and societies are all linked by branching, but not sealed lines of common ancestry going back 6,000 years.
• So why does such a family exist??
• Two aspects of studying the past of Austronesians: Linguistic and archaeological. No texts extend back that far.
Austronesian Linguistics
• The Austronesian languages form a single and close-knit family, similar in terms of internal diversity with language families such as Indo-European. It is possibly the largest language in the world, comprising some 1200 languages.
• The discovery of the language family goes back to the 17th century. Today, after having recorded the majority of the languages, they have reconstructed a proto-Austronesian through systematic comparison of sound correspondences between the various languages, to give some idea of the lexicon of the earliest ancestor of these languages.
• Linguistics claims that the Austronesian languages derive from a single parent language spoken on Taiwan 5,000 years ago. There are four subgroups of Austronesian. Three of these are only spoken on Taiwan and the fourth is those Austronesian languages spoken in all areas outside Taiwan. Spread of languages shown on map.
• Based on the linguistic evidence, the first Austronesians are believed to have originated somewhere in what is today Southern China before moving to Taiwan 5000-6000 years ago. They remained there for some time before some moved southwards into the northern Philippines
• Based on linguistic analysis, claims about the early societies have been made. It is suggested that, after the first seafarers moved from Taiwan to the Philippines, major developments in their culture occurred. We are only able to reconstruct a few words relating to sailing technology at the highest levels of the Austronesian family tree. But at the next level down, the level ancestral to all those people who left their Taiwan homeland, we find terms for outriggers, sails, paddles, rudders, and a whole range of new developments in seafaring. New kinds of plants became available, and new species of fauna were encountered.
• The claims that the Austronesian maritime expansion moved in a northerly direction as well as southwards derives from both archaeological correlations and linguistic claims of an Austronesian substratum in the Japanese languages. One of the proponents of this idea was Murayama Shichiro (1908-1995), who claimed links between Austronesian and Ainu languages. The claim remains contested.
Austronesian Archaeology
• The other aspect is archaeological. And one of the key figures in this is Peter Bellwood of the ANU. He argues that the Neolithic revolutions in China—new polished stone technologies and introduction of agriculture -- sparked population growth and that the food supply provided by the new technology allowed a “continuous generation-by-generation ‘budding off’ of new families into new terrain”, which was supported by “the inherent transportability and reproducibility of the agricultural economy” and “a developing tradition of sailing-canoe construction and navigation”.
• Their technologies were marked by polished stone tools and by agriculture. Jared Diamond notes that they did not settle on islands which did not support their agricultural 'package' (e.g., New Guinea and Australia) because they had no advantage. These people maintained links with the islands from whence they came and thereby created a wide-ranging trade network.
• As people moved south from Taiwan, into the Philippines, Borneo, Sulawesi and the Moluccas, their vocabulary changed with new terms relating to breadfruit, banana, yam, sago and coconut. Reflects a movement away from rice to greater dependence on tubers and fruits in the tropics.
• Spread associated with pottery. 3000-4000 BC, the appearance of pottery on Taiwan
• Between 2500 and 1500 BC, the pottery assemblages appear through coastal Indonesia and by 1500 BC, they extended from Taiwan to western Melanesia.
• Reasons for spread:
1. Continuous population growth as a result of food provided by agriculture, allowing generation-by-generation “budding-off”
2. Inherent transportability and reproducibility of the agricultural economy.
3. Presence of a deep and absorbent “frontier zone” adjacent to the early areas of agricultural development. Populations sparse
4. A developing tradition of sailing canoe construction and navigation
5. A preference for rapid coastal movement, initially for fishing but followed later by the agriculturalists.
• Neolithic populations covered the whole of Mainland Southeast Asia by 2000 BC. However, these were likely Austroasiatic speakers, not the sea-faring Austronesians, who settled on the peninsula much later.