
According to Yun, the rider wears a kind of lamellar cuirass. Yet it seems to me that this cuirass only protect the front of his body. Each of its component is fastened to his arms, his legs.
QUOTE
Hello Yun!
I have heard a lot about you. I just have a question to ask if you don't mind. Hum.., hopefully I did not disturb you.
It is like this. I saw this Mongol armour in totalwarcenter. I remember I saw it somewhere but cannot remember and I intend to post a thread to introduce this Chinese style armour. But I am really sure so I only want to ask whether or not it is a Chinese armour or not. If not, then do you know its term, where does this come from. I just need for sure so I don't spread "disinformation" upon this forum.
Thanks
I have heard a lot about you. I just have a question to ask if you don't mind. Hum.., hopefully I did not disturb you.
It is like this. I saw this Mongol armour in totalwarcenter. I remember I saw it somewhere but cannot remember and I intend to post a thread to introduce this Chinese style armour. But I am really sure so I only want to ask whether or not it is a Chinese armour or not. If not, then do you know its term, where does this come from. I just need for sure so I don't spread "disinformation" upon this forum.
Thanks
Hi Boleslaw,
That is a largely accurate depiction of horse armour used by the Jurchen (Jin) and Song armies, and later also by the Mongols. The sources for it are Song-period art and military manuals.
As for the rider's armour, that is a standard lamellar style that had remained essentially unchanged for centuries.
regards,
Yun
