Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: China's Terracotta Army Covered in Egg?
China History Forum, Chinese History Forum > Chinese History Topics > Chinese Archaeology
galvatron
China's Terracotta Army Covered in Egg g.gif

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/04/18/t...a-army-egg.html

April 18, 2008 -- China's terracotta army, a collection of 7,000 soldier and horse figures in the mausoleum of the country's first emperor, was entirely covered with beaten egg when it was constructed, according to German and Italian chemists who have analyzed samples from several of the figurines.

According to the research team, the egg served as a binder for colorful paints, which went over a layer of lacquer.

Co-author Catharina Blaensdorf, a scientist at the Technical University of Munich in Germay, explained to Discovery News that "egg paint is normally very stable, and not soluble in water...This makes [it] less sensitive to humidity and moisture."

Egg proteins would have also ensured the adhesion of the paint to the lacquer, while also giving the paint thickness and texture, added Blaensdorf's colleague Ilaria Bonaduce, of the University of Pisa in Italy.

For the study, which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Cultural Heritage, the researchers took samples from warrior figurine faces, kneeling archers, swans and paint fragments found on the ground inside the 210 B.C. mausoleum. They chemically separated the flakes to isolate the ingredients, and then inserted them into a machine that determined their composition.

The researchers thought animal glue might have served as a binder, but all of the data pointed to egg instead. The pigments, they found, were bone white, lead white, cerussite (which sparkles), quartz, cinnabar, malachite, charcoal black, copper salts, Chinese purple and azurite. wink.gif
Pattie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempera

kaiselin
QUOTE (galvatron @ Apr 25 2008, 12:18 AM) *
China's Terracotta Army Covered in Egg g.gif

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/04/18/t...a-army-egg.html

April 18, 2008 -- China's terracotta army, a collection of 7,000 soldier and horse figures in the mausoleum of the country's first emperor, was entirely covered with beaten egg when it was constructed, according to German and Italian chemists who have analyzed samples from several of the figurines.

According to the research team, the egg served as a binder for colorful paints, which went over a layer of lacquer.

Co-author Catharina Blaensdorf, a scientist at the Technical University of Munich in Germay, explained to Discovery News that "egg paint is normally very stable, and not soluble in water...This makes [it] less sensitive to humidity and moisture."

Egg proteins would have also ensured the adhesion of the paint to the lacquer, while also giving the paint thickness and texture, added Blaensdorf's colleague Ilaria Bonaduce, of the University of Pisa in Italy.

For the study, which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Cultural Heritage, the researchers took samples from warrior figurine faces, kneeling archers, swans and paint fragments found on the ground inside the 210 B.C. mausoleum. They chemically separated the flakes to isolate the ingredients, and then inserted them into a machine that determined their composition.

The researchers thought animal glue might have served as a binder, but all of the data pointed to egg instead. The pigments, they found, were bone white, lead white, cerussite (which sparkles), quartz, cinnabar, malachite, charcoal black, copper salts, Chinese purple and azurite. wink.gif



Who would have thought it would be as simple of an ingredient as egg whites!!! but what amazes me is that it is still there enough after all these years to find traces of it -- amazing ! ! !
Richard Lim
Don't kids still use paints with eggwhite (or synthetic version thereoff) binder today for craft projects? I seem to recall seeing egg tempera kid paints for sale in a crafts store.

Indeed using egg tempera as the main base for painting seems to have been the norm in the earlier period whereas oil painting, which now we generally tend to regard as the method of "old masters," was a relative newcomer in the grand scheme of things. In western Europe it came into use really around the 16th century whereas it was adopted much earlier for fresco painting (e.g., Buddhist sites in Central Asia) elsewhere. There was a BBC news feed about this regarding Buddhist cave paintings (near Bamiyan) not a couple of days ago.
Publius
Isn't Da Vinci's The Last Supper also egg tempera?
Pattie
QUOTE (Publius @ Apr 25 2008, 09:48 AM) *
Isn't Da Vinci's The Last Supper also egg tempera?


Yes. More's the pity as tempera, being protein and pigment, dries and flakes as you'd expect egg yolk to do when not varnished.
kaiselin
This brings a whole new meaning to the expression " face was covered in egg" implying being embarrassed. Sort of the opposite of saving face.
Publius
This would explain why the figures' vibrant colors corroded, but why did the colors fade more quickly than other egg tempera (like The Last Supper) paints? Was the age of the paint and the rapid humidity change to blame?
Pattie
QUOTE (Publius @ Apr 28 2008, 10:39 AM) *
This would explain why the figures' vibrant colors corroded, but why did the colors fade more quickly than other egg tempera (like The Last Supper) paints? Was the age of the paint and the rapid humidity change to blame?


I would go with the porous work surface and apparent lack of varnish. Terracotta breathes, sweats and is generally 'dirt' like. I've painted many a pot and watched my work peel and flake due to exposure to the elements. However, if you want cheap blanks, there's nothing better!

I will say that I think the person who decided to not glaze and fire the army deserves a metal! Can you imagine the deforestation that would have resulted had the army been glazed?! However! What an awesome kiln that would have been! ^__^ I can imagine a massive walk-in closet sort of set up with piles of exploded body parts that didn't take well to the heat.

Speaking of which...have any molds ever been found? I actually know next to nothing about the army. cool.gif

Publius
I have been browsing through the book “The Terra Cotta Army: China’s First Emperor and the Birth of a Nation." Surprisingly (at least to me), it says that the warriors were fired and lacquered, though it didn't say anything about extant molds that were used to form the original army. Is this accurate, were the warriors lacquered and fired?

Here's some paraphrased bits about the production of the army:

Why were there so many terra cotta soldiers (roughly 8000)? No army could be called an army unless it was a wan, 10,000 strong (wan really means “large” and not literally 10,000) (128). Attaining this sense of realism also drove Qin Shihuang to arm the infantry, archers, and charioteers.

What were the soldiers made of? Thankfully, he didn’t choose human sacrifices, and, instead, opted for clay. Clay is cheap (could you imagine a bronze, jade, or gold army?) and wouldn’t deplete the military’s strength (such as using humans). Also, clay was easy to manipulate and quickly produced. (129)

How was the army manufactured? There are no historical sources, i.e. Sima Qian, that account for the production, but many elements needed for an assembly-line like production were already in place: clay (beds were all over northern China), furnaces (bronze production was well established and used molds for interchangeable parts), artistry, and laborers.

Since history is silent on this subject, the author of “Beyond the Grave,” visited a modern, replica terra cotta army ceramics factory, which claims to use the original techniques. First, the artist takes the raw clay and pummel it to get the bubbles out, then they squeeze it into the right molds (analysis of the warriors reveals some 80 different molds). The Qin sculptors did not use molds to make the heavy legs, or many of the torsos. Instead, they rolled clay into long, thin cylinders, coiling these on top of each other and then smoothing out the dents and bumps, the same way as potters make a pot freehand (143). Once assembled, the clat is hardened for a few days (in a sunless, windless environment), and, finally, the artist takes the molds off and makes the finishing touches, such as using a stylus to define the hair. The clay soldier is then fired in a coal-fired kiln dug into cliffs. The firing takes a week on low temperatures to ensure regular heating, then a couple of days at high temperatures, up to 1000 Celcius. The whole process takes about 20 days (140). The height of the rank-and-file soldiers range between 1.66 meters and 1.87 meters, with an average of 1.77 meters (5’10.5”). Officers were taller, averaging 1.9 meters, while a general is 1.96 meters.

Hairstyle was also of importance. Most infantrymen had the top-knot on the right. Those without top-knots presumably wore helmets. Officers, cavalrymen and charioteers favored flat knots on the back of the head. Facial hair is attributed to beauty and status. Beards could be worn as side-whiskers, three-drop beards, half-shaved, divided, full (one warrior has a beard down to his chest) or residual. Mustaches could be upturned crescents, down-turned, arrow-headed or flat. (147 – 148)

Lastly, the warriors were painted. The warriors were lacquered to serve as a foundation layer for the paint. Each statue would have been sealed using the sap from up to 25 trees (Chistina Thieme’s “East Asian Lacquer). The colors used were red (cinnabar from a cinnabar mine 200 KM south of Xian owned by the Widow Qing), white, green, black, brown, blue, and purple (Han Purple, made from barium, copper, quartz, and lead melted together at 900 – 1100C, was the most extravagant).

The author asked the plant manager “why are the heads done separately?”

“Because when you make a life-size warrior, you have 1.8 meters of clay, so you have to consider how to keep it balanced. It was the same 2,000 years ago. There are three ways. One is to make a base, which is what some of them have. Another way is to make them kneeling, like the kneeling archers. The third way is to make sure the legs are heavy and the rest of the body is light, so you give them solid legs and a hollow chest. That’s how most of them are made.”

“And if the statue has a hollow chest, what happens when you put it in the kiln with the head on?”

“The air expands and it would blow up. So we leave a big hole for the neck and add the head afterwards.” (133 – 134)

Also, here's some things kenneth mentioned on the Qin Shi Huang's tomb thread:

QUOTE
The process is now better understood, the # people working on the buried army, the names of supervisors (such as found inscribed on some of the figures) and the construction of the figures now has decades of analysis. The teams of artisans that made them were quite small & specialised with expert overseers. The output in figures per year has been calculated (the work unfinished when QSH died).
There are actually only a limited variety of head types, base templates, from which final minor adjustments were made to give the individual appearances such as the way the hair was shaped or the particular facial hair.
Think of a really refined version of the 'Mr Potato head' toy, but with world class artists making different additional features. After the many hundreds & hundreds of reconstructions made from fragments the assembly line manufacturing is not so mysterious as it was 20 years ago even though it is still rightfully impressive. The idea they were modelled on real soldiers who gave portrait sittings was entirely speculation in the early days when there was a lot of excitement over their realism, but they have been studied quite closely and for a long time now so more up-to-date books will describe the construction in more realistic terms.
Naturally it does not lessen the impact or realism of the figures if we don't have to accept thousands of soldiers lined up to be immortalised but it does go to show how many myths about the buried armies die hard.


Source: Man, John. 2008. “The Terra Cotta Army: China’s First Emperor and the Birth of a Nation.” Decopo Press, Cambridge
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.