Historically the Solons offered one of the fiercest resistment towards Nurhaqi and Abahai as they attempted to unify the various Tungus tribes of North East Asia. The Solons and other Evenkis are linguistically classified as Northern Tungus, while their cousins such as the Manchu and Xibe are the South-Western Tungus. The Solons, out of all the Tungus ethnicities, are the most Mongol-influenced, especially in their clothing, pastoral activities w/ horses (most Tungus tribes practice hunting/fishing/ or deer herding), and the use of long vowels similar to that in Mongol languages (Manchu and Nanai do not use long vowels)
from Henry G Schwarz (The Minorities of Northern China: A Survey, 1984)
QUOTE
P. 177:
During the first half of the seventeenth century, the original Evenks moved east and spread along several tributaries of the upper and middle Amur river. Qing documents referred to them as Solonbu and Kamnikan/Khamnigan. At that time the Evenks already were in frequent contact with Manchus with whom they exchanged furs for cloth, silk and iron goods. Some Evenks who already lived a settled life and practiced small-scale herding began to wear Manchu dress.
In 1633-34 the Manchus adopted the Ming name Solonbu for the Evenks, and in 1639-40 they forced the Evenks into the eight-banner system. Soon thereafter the Qing government prodded the Evenks to settle down in the Nonni river region, specifically along the banks of the Gan, Nuomin, Arun, Jiqin, Yalu, and Nemor rivers, where some of the Evenks took up herding and farming. In 1732 more than 1,000 Evenk officers and soldiers in the Butha region and their relatives were dispatched to Hulunbuir to guard the frontier where they gradually developed into the present-day population of the Evenk Autonomous banner. The Evenks evidently acquitted themselves rather well as border guards there so that, along with the Daurs and Oroqens, more Evenk banner troops were sent to many other border assignments, especially in the North east and the far-away Northwest
-----During the first half of the seventeenth century, the original Evenks moved east and spread along several tributaries of the upper and middle Amur river. Qing documents referred to them as Solonbu and Kamnikan/Khamnigan. At that time the Evenks already were in frequent contact with Manchus with whom they exchanged furs for cloth, silk and iron goods. Some Evenks who already lived a settled life and practiced small-scale herding began to wear Manchu dress.
In 1633-34 the Manchus adopted the Ming name Solonbu for the Evenks, and in 1639-40 they forced the Evenks into the eight-banner system. Soon thereafter the Qing government prodded the Evenks to settle down in the Nonni river region, specifically along the banks of the Gan, Nuomin, Arun, Jiqin, Yalu, and Nemor rivers, where some of the Evenks took up herding and farming. In 1732 more than 1,000 Evenk officers and soldiers in the Butha region and their relatives were dispatched to Hulunbuir to guard the frontier where they gradually developed into the present-day population of the Evenk Autonomous banner. The Evenks evidently acquitted themselves rather well as border guards there so that, along with the Daurs and Oroqens, more Evenk banner troops were sent to many other border assignments, especially in the North east and the far-away Northwest
There's been some issues over ethnic classifications as the Evenks are a broad group, over 30,000 in China, and another 30,000 in Russia. The area they inhabit ranges from the northern half of Heilongjiang, all the way to the Arctic fringes in Siberia and the Russian Far East. Many of these groups don't have much linguistical intelligibility with each other, and for some, major cultural differences (the Solons for example are very Mongol influenced while the others are similar to paleo-siberians).
Within China, another group, the Oroqen are pretty close with the two main Evenk groups (Solon & Khamnigan), but yet received their own recognized nationality. As to why, no one really knows, or at least there's no documented reasoning behind all of this. During the late Qing era, the Daurs were mistakingly called Solons as well.
-------
Manchu campaigns against the Solons
compiled from "Manzhou Rule in China, 1983" USSR Academy of Sciences
------------------
QUOTE
p.82-83
During this period the Manchus were locked in struggle with the Solons.
General Samshika, who had won distinction in the struggle against other Amur tribes, was sent against the Solon chief Bomboguoer in December 1638. This must have been a not very successful campaign. The Solons resisted staunchly.
For the Manchus, the war against Bamboguoer acquired growing significance. In December 1639, Abahai sent another large force against him. This force penetrated deep into Solon territory, reaching the river Humar (Kumara).
In May 1640, the Manchus launched several assaults and after a blody seige captured four fortresses - Duochen, Asajin, Yakesa, and Duojin -- taking many prisoners and a large number of cattle, horses, and pelts.
Although they suffered heavy losses, the Solons went on resisting. However, the Manchu numerical and armaments superiority made itself felt. Individual Solons began going over to the side of the enemy. In July 1640, for instance, 337 families of that tribe joined the Manchus. These were immediately resettled in the Mongolian steppe aimak of Guoerluos. Enough new settlers arrived to form eight niurhus.
In August 1640 Abahai sent the general Xiteku against Bomboguoer. The latter fled to Mongolia, but Xiteku caught up with him in the vicinity of Qiluotai, capturing his baggage train, wives and children. Another 1,470 Solons went over to the Manchus in June 1641.
In parallel, the Manchus warred against the Huerha tribe.
During this period the Manchus were locked in struggle with the Solons.
General Samshika, who had won distinction in the struggle against other Amur tribes, was sent against the Solon chief Bomboguoer in December 1638. This must have been a not very successful campaign. The Solons resisted staunchly.
For the Manchus, the war against Bamboguoer acquired growing significance. In December 1639, Abahai sent another large force against him. This force penetrated deep into Solon territory, reaching the river Humar (Kumara).
In May 1640, the Manchus launched several assaults and after a blody seige captured four fortresses - Duochen, Asajin, Yakesa, and Duojin -- taking many prisoners and a large number of cattle, horses, and pelts.
Although they suffered heavy losses, the Solons went on resisting. However, the Manchu numerical and armaments superiority made itself felt. Individual Solons began going over to the side of the enemy. In July 1640, for instance, 337 families of that tribe joined the Manchus. These were immediately resettled in the Mongolian steppe aimak of Guoerluos. Enough new settlers arrived to form eight niurhus.
In August 1640 Abahai sent the general Xiteku against Bomboguoer. The latter fled to Mongolia, but Xiteku caught up with him in the vicinity of Qiluotai, capturing his baggage train, wives and children. Another 1,470 Solons went over to the Manchus in June 1641.
In parallel, the Manchus warred against the Huerha tribe.
then goes on for 2-3 pages of Manchu campaigns against other Tungus tribes until page 85 they are mentioned again
QUOTE
p.85
For the Manchus the campaigns against the Solons were the most arduous, and they were extremely costly to both sides in terms of casualties. All the Manchus got from the Solons after these long wars was the payment of a "tribute", but this hardly compensated for the gifts that had to be made. No Manchu viceroy or governor was ever appointed to the Solon lands. Up until 1684 the Manchus built no populated localities or fortifications on these lands. Only a small number of Solons were enlisted into the Manchu banner forces. Later, when the Manchus began the conquest of China they ceased all contacts with the Solons (with the exception of irregular receipt of "tribute" and the giving of givts in exchange). There is no information in sources about the life of the Solons following their nominal subjugation by the Manchus.
For the Manchus the campaigns against the Solons were the most arduous, and they were extremely costly to both sides in terms of casualties. All the Manchus got from the Solons after these long wars was the payment of a "tribute", but this hardly compensated for the gifts that had to be made. No Manchu viceroy or governor was ever appointed to the Solon lands. Up until 1684 the Manchus built no populated localities or fortifications on these lands. Only a small number of Solons were enlisted into the Manchu banner forces. Later, when the Manchus began the conquest of China they ceased all contacts with the Solons (with the exception of irregular receipt of "tribute" and the giving of givts in exchange). There is no information in sources about the life of the Solons following their nominal subjugation by the Manchus.
Much of this information is compiled from B.O. Dolgikh, Taizong Shilu, Y.P Lebedeva "Ucheniye zapiski Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta).
----
Linguistic comparisons between Solon and Manchu language
----
(S) = Solon dialect of Evenk (M) = Manchu
river - bira (S) bira (M)
iron - sala (S) sele (M)
yellow - singaring (S) suwayan (M)
mountain - ura (S) alin (M)
meat - ulta (S) yali (M)
Comparisons between Solon and Jurchen
hand - naal (S) gala (J)
tongue - iengi (S) ilengu (J)
mouth - angma (S) amga (J)
autunm - bol (S) bolo erin (J)
fire - tog (S) tuwe (J)
-----
pictures of modern day Solons, note the heavy Mongol influence










