Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Solons, the northern horsemen
China History Forum, Chinese History Forum > Chinese History Topics > Chinese Ethnic Groups and Peoples > Ethnic Minorities of China
Karakhan
For those who are unaware, the Solons are now re-classified as the Evenki, 鄂温克(Ewenke), which is a broad definition. To put things in perspective.. all Solons are Evenki, but not all Evenks are Solon.

Historically the Solons offered one of the fiercest resistment towards Nurhaqi and Abahai as they attempted to unify the various Tungus tribes of North East Asia. The Solons and other Evenkis are linguistically classified as Northern Tungus, while their cousins such as the Manchu and Xibe are the South-Western Tungus. The Solons, out of all the Tungus ethnicities, are the most Mongol-influenced, especially in their clothing, pastoral activities w/ horses (most Tungus tribes practice hunting/fishing/ or deer herding), and the use of long vowels similar to that in Mongol languages (Manchu and Nanai do not use long vowels)

from Henry G Schwarz (The Minorities of Northern China: A Survey, 1984)

QUOTE
P. 177:
During the first half of the seventeenth century, the original Evenks moved east and spread along several tributaries of the upper and middle Amur river.  Qing documents referred to them as Solonbu and Kamnikan/Khamnigan.  At that time the Evenks already were in frequent contact with Manchus with whom they exchanged furs for cloth, silk and iron goods.  Some Evenks who already lived a settled life and practiced small-scale herding began to wear Manchu dress.

In 1633-34 the Manchus adopted the Ming name Solonbu for the Evenks, and in 1639-40 they forced the Evenks into the eight-banner system.  Soon thereafter the Qing government prodded the Evenks to settle down in the Nonni river region, specifically along the banks of the Gan, Nuomin, Arun, Jiqin, Yalu, and Nemor rivers, where some of the Evenks took up herding and farming.  In 1732 more than 1,000 Evenk officers and soldiers in the Butha region and their relatives were dispatched to Hulunbuir to guard the frontier where they gradually developed into  the present-day population of the Evenk Autonomous banner.  The Evenks evidently acquitted themselves rather well as border guards there so that, along with the Daurs and Oroqens, more Evenk banner troops were sent to many other border assignments, especially in the North east and the far-away Northwest
-----
There's been some issues over ethnic classifications as the Evenks are a broad group, over 30,000 in China, and another 30,000 in Russia. The area they inhabit ranges from the northern half of Heilongjiang, all the way to the Arctic fringes in Siberia and the Russian Far East. Many of these groups don't have much linguistical intelligibility with each other, and for some, major cultural differences (the Solons for example are very Mongol influenced while the others are similar to paleo-siberians).

Within China, another group, the Oroqen are pretty close with the two main Evenk groups (Solon & Khamnigan), but yet received their own recognized nationality. As to why, no one really knows, or at least there's no documented reasoning behind all of this. During the late Qing era, the Daurs were mistakingly called Solons as well.
-------

Manchu campaigns against the Solons
compiled from "Manzhou Rule in China, 1983" USSR Academy of Sciences
------------------
QUOTE
p.82-83

During this period the Manchus were locked in struggle with the Solons.

General Samshika, who had won distinction in the struggle against other Amur tribes, was sent against the Solon chief Bomboguoer in December 1638.  This must have been a not very successful campaign.  The Solons resisted staunchly.

For the Manchus, the war against Bamboguoer acquired growing significance.  In December 1639, Abahai sent another large force against him.  This force penetrated deep into Solon territory, reaching the river Humar (Kumara).

In May 1640, the Manchus launched several assaults and after a blody seige captured four fortresses - Duochen, Asajin, Yakesa, and Duojin -- taking many prisoners and a large number of cattle, horses, and pelts.

Although they suffered heavy losses, the Solons went on resisting.  However, the Manchu numerical and armaments superiority made itself felt.  Individual Solons began going over to the side of the enemy.  In July 1640, for instance, 337 families of that tribe joined the Manchus.  These were immediately resettled in the Mongolian steppe aimak of Guoerluos.  Enough new settlers arrived to form eight niurhus.

In August 1640 Abahai sent the general Xiteku against Bomboguoer.  The latter fled to Mongolia, but Xiteku caught up with him in the vicinity of Qiluotai, capturing his baggage train, wives and children.  Another 1,470 Solons went over to the Manchus in June 1641.

In parallel, the Manchus warred against the Huerha tribe. 

then goes on for 2-3 pages of Manchu campaigns against other Tungus tribes until page 85 they are mentioned again

QUOTE
p.85
For the Manchus the campaigns against the Solons were the most arduous, and they were extremely costly to both sides in terms of casualties.  All the Manchus got from the Solons after these long wars was the payment of a "tribute", but this hardly compensated for the gifts that had to be made.  No Manchu viceroy or governor was ever appointed to the Solon lands.  Up until 1684 the Manchus built no populated localities or fortifications on these lands.  Only a small number of Solons were  enlisted into the Manchu banner forces.  Later, when the Manchus began the conquest of China they ceased all contacts with the Solons (with the exception of irregular receipt of "tribute" and the giving of givts in exchange).  There is no information in sources about the life of the Solons following their nominal subjugation by the Manchus.


Much of this information is compiled from B.O. Dolgikh, Taizong Shilu, Y.P Lebedeva "Ucheniye zapiski Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta).

----
Linguistic comparisons between Solon and Manchu language
----
(S) = Solon dialect of Evenk (M) = Manchu

river - bira (S) bira (M)
iron - sala (S) sele (M)
yellow - singaring (S) suwayan (M)
mountain - ura (S) alin (M)
meat - ulta (S) yali (M)

Comparisons between Solon and Jurchen

hand - naal (S) gala (J)
tongue - iengi (S) ilengu (J)
mouth - angma (S) amga (J)
autunm - bol (S) bolo erin (J)
fire - tog (S) tuwe (J)
-----

pictures of modern day Solons, note the heavy Mongol influence











Karakhan








MING-LOYALIST
Are these pictures taken from Hulunbeir plains in Inner Mongol? Thats where they live right?
Karakhan
QUOTE(MING-LOYALIST @ May 5 2005, 05:08 AM)
Are these pictures taken from Hulunbeir plains in Inner Mongol? Thats where they live right?
[snapback]4718228[/snapback]


Yes, they are mostly there although there are also many in Heilongjiang too.

There is also an equal amount in Russia where they are distributed over a wider territory such as shown here
tianzhuwoye
QUOTE(Karakhan @ May 3 2005, 10:15 AM)
For those who are unaware, the Solons are now re-classified as the Evenki, 鄂温克(Ewenke), which is a broad definition.  To put things in perspective.. all Solons are Evenki, but not all Evenks are Solon.

There's been some issues over ethnic classifications as the Evenks are a broad group, over 30,000 in China, and another 30,000 in Russia.  The area they inhabit ranges from the northern half of Heilongjiang, all the way to the Arctic fringes in Siberia and the Russian Far East.  Many of these groups don't have much linguistical intelligibility with each other, and for some, major cultural differences (the Solons for example are very Mongol influenced while the others are similar to paleo-siberians).

Within China, another group, the Oroqen are pretty close with the two main Evenk groups (Solon & Khamnigan), but yet received their own recognized nationality.  As to why, no one really knows, or at least there's no documented reasoning behind all of this.  During the late Qing era, the Daurs were mistakingly called Solons as well.

Can I trouble you to help out a bit more with how these classifications and reclassifications happened? My understanding was that 'Solon' was an early Manchu word basically meaning "not us/barbarian," in a vague "Hu" or "Yi" kind of sense where a bunch of peoples who could have been broken down further by the writers of history weren't. This is probably how the Daur sometimes got lumped together with the Solon. Is the also vague term 'Evenki' just the new (less offensive?) way of referring to people in the area not co-opted into Manchuness? And does Russian make the same distinctions?

Also, I haven't seen the names of any of today's official Heilongjiang ethnicities mentioned in pre-Qing records, if they're out there let me know. Oroqen settlements were 'discovered' soon enough by Qing-era Sinophone exiles to the northeast so their eventual officialness probably 'benefitted' from this relatively early contact. But is there anything to the possible connection between the 'wild' 野人 Jurchen and the people later referred to as the Solon?
Karakhan
^no problem. However because I move, i do not have access to the sources i derive the info from (a university library).

But from what I recall, most Tungus ethnicities usually name themselves after, or refer to something very local for a name.. such as a mountain, river, etc. As a result, you got alot of various groups if you were to follow such a type of designation, which is why I think many governments tried to adopt a more broader definition.

I think the Solons did call themselves Solons, and they were almost the only Northern Tungusic ethnicity that practiced horse ridings and had clothing similar to Mongolians.

Alot of people do wonder why the PRC made the Oroqen a seperate "nationality" when they are much closer to the Ewenke (in language, culture and life style), than the Solons are.

No idea where the name Evenki came either, just that it was adopted in 1931. Before that the Russians used the name Tungus (even more ambiguous) and the Chinese groups just went by their local designation "Birachen, Orochen, Khamnigan, etc".
naruwan
great info. Thanks.

Perhaps, the solon word was later adapted to have the meaning of barbarians. Much like how the word 胡 was how the nomad referred to themselves.
kaixin
Some of their females have quite attractive features.
tianzhuwoye
QUOTE(Karakhan @ Jul 12 2005, 06:30 AM)
But from what I recall, most Tungus ethnicities usually name themselves after, or refer to something very local for a name..  such as a mountain, river, etc.  As a result, you got alot of various groups if you were to follow such a type of designation, which is why I think many governments tried to adopt a more broader definition.

This is an important point, applying to the 'Jurchens' for a good part of their history. Thanks for bringing it up!

QUOTE
Alot of people do wonder why the PRC made the Oroqen a seperate "nationality" when they are much closer to the Ewenke (in language, culture and life style), than the Solons are.

I'm gonna throw out this pretty goofy idea: not knowing how old the term 'Evenki' is (where does that 'v' come from?), the transcribed terms 鄂温克 Ewenke and 鄂伦春 Elunchun are similar enough given the general lack of possible lingusitic stability at the time- maybe it's the same thing, or something similar? The first records of these peoples written in Chinese were produced by people from various locations throughout the south, writing in a time when 'standard Mandarin' was shifting from the Nanjing pronunciation (standard through even after the relocation of the Ming capital) to the "Tartar-Chinese dialect" of Beijing that finally became widespread later on in the 19th century. The earliest records (late Shunzhi/early Kangxi) were hardly official, government ordered surveys, being not much more than jottings by the first Sinophone visitors to this area who basically had free reign to come up with whatever names they wanted for all the new things they were seeing. Maybe the term Elunchun just got picked up and through its relative frequency in Chinese records took on a sense of uniqueness that, looking back with new standards, may not have been 'warranted.'
Karakhan
^I'm guessing the word "Evenki" was created out of Evenki words since they have the V sound in their language (or at least in the language of those living on the Russian side).. and Ewenke is basically the Chinese version of the name.

In Russia, there's another Tungusic minority called the Evens, who are similar but "different" than the Evenkis. This is probably the only Tungusic group that has no association with China in terms of history or counterparts on the other side.
tianzhuwoye
Yeah, what was up with the Even was the next question, did Even and Evenk appear at about the same time?

And what's going on with Oroqen (isn't this just a nativization of a Chinese term?), Oroch, Orok and Ulch? There's no official recognition of groups like the Nivkh and the Negidal in the PRC but I wouldn't know if they don't exist here or if they fall into some other official ethnic barrel.



Extremely unofficially, Chinese has the term 鞑子 Dazi, which is like a corruption of the term 'Tartar' and started out as an insult and today is less than pleasant sounding. The later Hezhe (or potentially anybody else) were referred to as 鱼皮鞑子 'Fish skin (wearing) Tartars.'

Leading to the last question for now, regarding the Gold/i, which I've seen is supposed to have referred to the Nanai/Hezhe/Hejen (on Sakhalin?) but has this word fallen out of use recently, and what's the argument for all these terms being used for the 'same' people?

Also, is 'Khamnigan' used to refer to more than one language?

Man, it's time to dust off those old Russian textbooks, huh.
Karakhan
QUOTE
Man, it's time to dust off those old Russian textbooks, huh.
If I only had access to them again, I would sad.gif


QUOTE
Yeah, what was up with the Even was the next question, did Even and Evenk appear at about the same time?


Russian sources, most of them at least, claim they were the same group (probably from some Jurchen group) at one point, but moved to different directions. Their habits were slightly different. the Evenki were reindeer herders (with some doing animal husbandry like the Solons). the Evens lived on the coast and did both fishing and herding reindeers.. the Evenks had a different name for the Evens (forgot what it was, but they were known as the Lamuts before). the Language between the two is dissimilar enough to warrant a seperate classification.



a basic map and by no means an accurate or detailed map..but good enough to show the distribution of the different Tungusic groups. As you can see, the Evens are the farthest north, with some even on Kamchatka. Their clothing and life style are very similar to Paleo-siberians. however physically they still retain the typical Tungusic features.. will post some pics of them in the near future when I can find it.

QUOTE
And what's going on with Oroqen (isn't this just a nativization of a Chinese term?), Oroch, Orok and Ulch? There's no official recognition of groups like the Nivkh and the Negidal in the PRC but I wouldn't know if they don't exist here or if they fall into some other official ethnic barrel.
Oro means reindeer in most Tungusic language.. so if one was Oroqen, it could be applied to virtually every northern Tungusic group, including the Evenki and Even. So it's still puzzling why the Chinese government decided to seperate them from the Ewenke.. one theory is perhaps they wanted to show the world they could recognize miniscule minorities. But then again, we'll probably never know why they differentiate two very similar groups, yet combine two very different groups (like the Mosuo and Naxi). The Soviets did the same thing.

the Amur groups, the Hezhe, the Nanai, Oroch, Orok, and Ulch are virtually the same and form the South-Eastern Tungus group (the Even, Evenks, and Oroqen are Northern Tungus). Unlike them, they were usually stationary along different regions on the Amur and sometimes travel to Sakhalin (where the Oroks settled but became reindeer herders instead). While they do usually go by their local name, all these groups do refer to themselves as "Nani" meaning people. Furthermore, their languages are very similar to each other and intelligible. Thus the Soviets could've easily classified these groups as the same group.. but they usually prefer to divide groups up. The Nanai are the biggest and are the same as the Hezhe in China. I made a seperate thread about them here..
http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php...&st=0&p=4717559
you can find some pics and some linguistic comparisons between Nanai, Jurchen and Manchu. the South-Eastern group are clearly descended from the Jurchens and the vocabulary and grammar is very similar to Jurchen and Manchu. the Northern Tungus (Evenki, etc) have several distinct differences.. one major difference is that the northern group has long vowels like Mongolian, infact sometimes much more. They also have more instances of vocabulary that's totally different from other Tungusic languages.


QUOTE
Extremely unofficially, Chinese has the term 鞑子 Dazi, which is like a corruption of the term 'Tartar' and started out as an insult and today is less than pleasant sounding. The later Hezhe (or potentially anybody else) were referred to as 鱼皮鞑子 'Fish skin (wearing) Tartars.'


While it is true that the Nanai/Hezhe wore fishskins, so did the Nivkhs (aka Gilyaks). I personally think that they were referring to the Nivkhs. the Chinese had contact with both.. but the Nanai were long associated as a Jurchen sub group, that I think they were probably referring to the Nivkhs who lived at the end of the Amur and on Sakhalin. The Nivkhs are considered paleo-siberian, not Tungus, and have no known linguistic relative anywhere in the world. They're pretty unique in that regard.. one Korean linguist claims that Koreans came from Nivkhs..but that's disputable. Culturally they are similar to the Amur groups.

QUOTE
Leading to the last question for now, regarding the Gold/i, which I've seen is supposed to have referred to the Nanai/Hezhe/Hejen (on Sakhalin?) but has this word fallen out of use recently, and what's the argument for all these terms being used for the 'same' people?
like stated earlier, the Amur groups generally labled each other as "Nani" and then went into their local designation such as "Birar", etc. (sorry no exact names at the moment as no access to books). Nanai is probably derived from Nani.. no idea where the Chinese got Hezhe from. Goldi is a foreign word that the Russians used. The other Amur groups also had other designations

QUOTE
Also, is 'Khamnigan' used to refer to more than one language?


Khamnigan is a mountain in N.E China, and as such, the Ewenke's there are referred as Khamnigan Ewenke. However because they are large in number and have a distinct dialect, they're usually seperated from the Solons, etc when doing detailed linguistical studies.

hope this helps smile.gif
tianzhuwoye
Thank you so much for your help! Sorry to put you through all this blush.gif
kaixin
These people should not be occupied by the white Russians. They are the same race as us Chinese. I think the Chinese should migrate up to Siberia and help these people. The rulers of Yakutia and Tuva actually welcome the Chinese presence and say that intermarriage helps strengthen their people (I guess they direct this remark at Russians).
tianzhuwoye
QUOTE(kaixin @ Aug 1 2005, 12:12 PM)
These people should not be occupied by the white Russians.
There's an argument there.

QUOTE
They are the same race as us Chinese.
What does this mean? Also, what does something as scientifically unsound as race have to do with political borders here in the 21st century? These peoples culturally and politically had next to zero association with the central plains empires previous to the Qing takeover of the old Ming territory.

QUOTE
I think the Chinese should migrate up to Siberia and help these people.
Thank you, yellow man's burden. What would 'helping out' past the Amur look like? Similar to the degrading ethnomuseum exhibitions we have today? Would you carry forceful assimilation policies and the destruction of these people's identities past the current borders of the PRC? The watered-down official version of these peoples' 'culture,' the closely monitored parade of funny hats and dance numbers either playing up to urban China's fantasies of these faraway lands or singing the praises of the CCP is maintained just enough to bring in income for the tourist industry. These people are invited to the party, as it were, long enough to justify the settlement, takeover and transformation of the area by 'other Chinese people' from the central plains which, as is clearly evident, has been enormously 'successful' as it's extremely difficult to realize how newly incorporated into the Sinocentric orbit these areas are.

There's again obviously an argument that these areas are politically Russian as a legacy of imperialism. Replacing this situation with a new imperialist occupation does not solve the problem, it just shifts the focus. For people who are obsessed with race and ethnicity to the point that it's developed into a literal fetish it might make sense that occupation by 'other Asians' should be preferred to "white Russian" administration, but how pumped up about Manchukuo were you?

Sinocentrism is not a viable answer to Eurocentrism. It's about as effective as replacing an oppressive ruling class with another oppressive ruling class and calling it a revolution. If you’re saying that these people deserve access to the pride that could come with a strong sense of identity, that’s fine to a degree, but forcing them into a new mold from the outside would contradict these goals. You’re just advancing the idea that some kinds of colonization, based here on an irrelevant myth, are better than others. If you really want to help your littler yellow brothers, take a step back and figure out what would actually be beneficial to them, and not what's going to help out with your self-perpetuating inferiority complex.
Karakhan
QUOTE(kaixin @ Aug 1 2005, 04:12 AM)
These people should not be occupied by the white Russians.  They are the same race as us Chinese.  I think the Chinese should migrate up to Siberia and help these people.  The rulers of Yakutia and Tuva actually welcome the Chinese presence and say that intermarriage helps strengthen their people (I guess they direct this remark at Russians).
[snapback]4743620[/snapback]


apart from the Yakuts and Tyvans, all the other mongoloid Russian minorities are too few in numbers to have their own country. Their populace never was that big, which is how they were absorbed into the Russian empire easily.

One could argue why should these people be occupied by the Chinese. In any case, several of them, such as the Yakuts, have very little history with China..if at all. As some one who's actually been to Russia, I can tell you that despite some rivalries, they have no intention of leaving the Russian Federation.
MING-LOYALIST
Just a unrelated question.

If say Sakha republic decides to secede from the federation would it succed or would russia respond with force.

I got this from a yakut site.

QUOTE
1655-1675 the effect of the Manchu Empire upon Yakutia

At the same time that Tygyn was conquering the tribes of Yakutia, Manchuria, on his south-eastern borders was also expanding once more under its leader Aisin-Gioro Nurhachi.

In 1644, the Manchu occupied Beijing and founded the Qing dynasty which was to be the last Imperial dynasty of China, with Manchurian ruler Aisin-Gioro Fulin as Emperor of China.

The Tungus-Manchurian tribes and clans in Siberia, now could claim the protection of an overlord more powerful in that part of the world than the Russians, with large well equipped armies (Jesuits had helped update their guns) guarding their borders. Sakha and even Cossacks also escaped to Manchurian territory to escape Russian rule.

By 1670 Manchurian sovereignty had been reinstated over the Lamuts (Evens) on the Pacific coast around Okhotsk (Yakutia's east corner). And also collected tribute from Lamut clans on the Maya river who had been subjected to the Russians. Yakuts were encouraged to move south where Manchu armies had cleared out the Russian troops and mercenaries.

The Cossacks were independent mercenaries employed by the Russian government. In 1655 local Cossacks in Yakutia rebelled against the Russian officials at Yakutsk. They banded together and swore an oath to be free of their Russian oppressors.

Having had enough of Yakutia, they planned to emigrate south to a better climate. They raided warehouses in Yakutsk and pirated boats. Some three hundred of them with their (mostly Yakut) wives and children under their ataman Sorokin, set off down the rivers until they reached the Amur region in Manchurian territory where they settled in Albazin.

A Tungus tribe whose leader was called "Petrushka-Olyeni" by the Russians (Reindeer-Pete) escaped from the Lena where they had lived, fighting and killing Cossacks to get away to Dahuria a Manchurian province which Russia claimed.

The Albazin Cossacks found them and extorted tribute from Reindeer Pete of fifty sable skins. Reindeer Pete appealed to Beijing and was supported by Chinese governors in the region as they and others also molested by Albazin were Chinese subjects. Several complaint s about the behaviour of Cossacks on the Manchurian frontiers were sent to Beijing. The Russians and Cossacks were called bandits.

Fifty Sakha (Yakut) men (referred to by the Russian ambassador as deserters) escaped from Yakutsk with their wives and children. The governor sent a boyarson with Cossacks in pursuit of them. When they caught up with them, there was a fight. Many of the Cossacks were wounded and the Yakuts escaped. They settled amongst the Birars, a Tungus tribe tributary to the Manchus, but who were also exploited for tribute by Albazin.

Two of the Sakha leaders were taken by Manchu government officials to Beijing to the Emperor's Court. Their clothes were thought unusual, in the "German" fashion. (The traditional Yakut coat did look much like 17th century European dress). The Sakha representatives said that they had been sent by the Yakut princes to the Manchurian Emperor to offer their subjection to their rule, as the Russians oppressed them grievously, exacting tribute beyond their skill to furnish. Officials escorted them back to their companions and new Manchurian home.

The Russian government was furious at these defections by people who found the - not notably tolerant Manchu government preferable to Russian rule. The threat was immense. The Russian Empire stood to lose most of its eastern territory and with it a possible overland passage to America, access to the Pacific and above all friendly relations and profitable trade with China. They kept a close check on all defectors.

A report in 1670 from the Russian ambassador in Beijing, Milovanov stated "And after that came to the same Embassy compound a traitor, by race a Crim-Tatar Anashka Urusmanov who had belonged to the former voevoda (governor) of the Lena Dmitriev Fransbekov, but had fled from Dahuria from the Amur river into China some years back...And in the Chinese capital they saw a traitor a Russian, who had belonged to the Lena boyarson Thedorov Pushchin, Takhomka by name who had fled from Dahuria from Niki fort Cherigov in former years. And those traitors Anashko and Takhomka have taken wives unto themselves in the Chinese capital; and they follow the Chinese customs and receive food from the Bogdikhan (Manchu Emperor) and they dwell in houses of their own."

The Tsar sent a new ambassador to Beijing, Sparthary. Sparthary's Chinese interpreter was so useless he had him flogged. He then relied on Ferdinand Verbiest, the Jesuit astronomer from what is now Belgium, who in 1670 impressed the young Kangxi emperor by defeating the Chinese Muslim astronomer Yang Guang Xian who had written a book against the Jesuits, in a challenge held at court.

Sparthary requested that Kangxi hand over the Yakut refugees. But Kangxi refused. The traffic had not been all one way. The Tungus Solon Prince Gantimur had crossed the border into the Russian side. Kangxi refused to hand over the Yakuts except in exchange for Gantimur. It was stalemate.

In a letter to the Tsar, Kangxi also said "Now I am told that the people called Sakha belong to the Russian jurisdiction...but whether truly or not I cannot say." The Yakuts remained in Manchuria but they were not able to persuade the Emperor to send his troops as far north as Yakutsk to help them expel the Russians from their country.


http://homepage.ntlworld.com/heather.hobden1/Yakutia16c.htm
Peter S
QUOTE(kaixin @ Aug 1 2005, 12:12 AM) *
These people should not be occupied by the white Russians. They are the same race as us Chinese. I think the Chinese should migrate up to Siberia and help these people. The rulers of Yakutia and Tuva actually welcome the Chinese presence and say that intermarriage helps strengthen their people (I guess they direct this remark at Russians).


The Russians are withdrawing from their East Siberian settlements because the climate there is too severely cold and heating is difficult and very costly. Russia will probably want to keep East Siberia for strategic reasons.

As I see it, the only part of Russia PRC is worth taking is the Russian Maritime Province (South of the Amur river). The climate there is relatively warmer and the soil is fertile. Also, there is the Pearl of the East - Vladivostok.
Karakhan
QUOTE(MING-LOYALIST @ Jul 11 2007, 01:35 AM) *
Just a unrelated question.

If say Sakha republic decides to secede from the federation would it succed or would russia respond with force.

I got this from a yakut site.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/heather.hobden1/Yakutia16c.htm



Interesting link! thanks.

as for your question, it depends who's leading Russia. If it was Yeltsin, hey may respond with force, but he may also grant de-facto independence like in Chechnya where he refused to acknowledge the Chechens, but in effect, let them do what they want. It was only until Putin that the Chechen problem was dealt with as Yeltsin tended to not want to deal with anything difficult.

Putin is the opposite of Yeltsin, he wants a more centralized Russia and he has been cracking down on the ethnic republics. In fact some autonomous regions like Evenkia (named after the Tungusic people) no longer exist. for Yakutia (Sakha), they have much more political influence than the Evenkis, but even here they've been feeling Putin's political muscle as he's strongly supporting pro-Moscow politicians in that republic.

Should Sakha declare independence, Putin would most likely respond with force as territorial integrity of Russia is one of his priorities. He refuses to give up several small islands with Japan, let alone the largest ethnic Republic which is rich in resources.

But even if Sakha does become independence, it would be very difficult for them to survive with out Russian assistance. their entire international border will be only with Russia. While they do have a coast line, it is in the Arctic circle and frozen most of the year.. most ships will be unable to access Sakha's ports to make year round trade feasible. The infrastructure is lacking.. there are no railways or roads that connect Yakutsk (the capitol of Sakha) to the outside world, everything is either flown in, or sent up the Lena river (which is driven on during the times its frozen). There is one rail line that connects a remote southern Sakha city to the Trans-Siberian railway, which is pretty much their only direct line to the world markets..but since it is mostly in Russian territory, Sakha would rely heavily on Russia.

While the republic is surely rich in resources, most of the refineries are located outside of Sakha as they have little ability to do anything other than extract these resources, which get developed and sold elsewhere. The Republic has fought hard to develop their own refining capabilities and keeping a greater share of the profits but its been difficult for them to gain concessions from Putin.

As far as population patterns in Eastern Russia goes.. its divided into Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East, two distinct regions. the maritime province (Primorskiye) and Khabarovsk Krai are both located in the Russian Far East and face the Pacific Ocean. It is here where most of the Russian population is and Putin has been very protective of this region. Historically, all of Primorskiye and half of Khabarovsk Krai are the areas in dispute between the Qing and the Russians. Although prior to any Chinese Dynasty claims or Russian claims, the area is home to a variety of Tungusic peoples, some who joined their Manchu cousins, others who didn't and remained separate from them (like the Udeghe).

Interestingly, I would argue that Primorskiye would have a greater chance of becoming independent even though its population is mostly ethnic Russians rather than some native minority. Historically that has happened in the past, and even today, many Russians in Primorskiye feel that Moscow's economy is too oriented to Europe, and that they would be better off doing their own thing and integrate themselves with the Asian economies.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.