QUOTE(jiangji @ Dec 18 2005, 09:59 AM) [snapback]4777221[/snapback]
I saw somewhere saying that Yongle recongnize the costly navy expedition and scaled down its sixth navy expedition and remitted large taxes back to the farmers. During Yongle reign, he has significantly exhausted the Empire resources. His son and grandson, Hongxi and xuande Emperor have to clear up his mess by reducing taxes and cut gov't spending. This could explain why there isn't a lot of extra fund going to north by stopping the navy expedition.
Sea Trade was Ban after Yongle died. His son Hongxi follow the advice of the conservatives and introduce the Ban. I would imagine during the sixth navy expedition, some of the money from trade was making its way back to the Ming dynasty. But the Ban on Trade made sure that money will never came back.
QUOTE
The Ming did ban the trade but the trade continue to boom around 15-16th century. So, its really make no differeneces whether there is a ban or not.
Basically there was a large Black market trade in the 15-16th century, since trade was ban. This may had help contribute to the corruption of the Ming dynasty.
QUOTE
Before 1449, Emperor Xuande maintain a good relation with the mongol and have a reasonable strong defence set up. It is only the loss of 500,000 army in tumu that the wala were able to penetrate the great wall.
Wasn't Emperor Xuande the one that depend on eunuchs too much.
If there was still trade then the Ming Dynasty would have the Cash needed to improve the defense of the Great Wall, but this didn't happen because trade was ban.
EDIT: OK, I watch the show on the great wall. I appears that the Ming use really a lot of money to maintain, improve and expand the Great Wall. They use so much tax money that the peasants revolted, signaling the end of the Ming Dynasty.
Quite a pity, if they had not ban sea trading, then maybe the Ming would have more money for the Walls and there would not be a revolt ?