QUOTE(BlueNote @ Dec 9 2005, 08:51 PM) [snapback]4775375[/snapback]
Wow....this thread really got heated !
Unfortunately, yeah.
QUOTE
I'm not sure if Bruce chose the name Way of the Intercepting Fist (JKD) mainly because of Fencing. I feel Fencing def played a big part in the footwork......but it's not the main idea of JKD just a part. All the handwork and ideas of Fencing is already evident in Wing Chun.
Certainly, there's a fair amount of overlap there. QUOTE
I have Robert Smith's book Martial Musings where he said Wing Chun was a "minor" art. He def used it in a belittling way.....not because Wing Chun is not widely practiced outside of Southern China in the Mainland. I remember he said Hong Kong didn't have many "masters" either........strong words.
Again, whether Wing Chun is a major or minor art depends on the practictioner and his preferences. Smith focused mainly on the internal arts of Tai Chi/Bagua/Hsing Yi......I would say most practictioners of those styles would not "get" Wing Chun.
Again, whether Wing Chun is a major or minor art depends on the practictioner and his preferences. Smith focused mainly on the internal arts of Tai Chi/Bagua/Hsing Yi......I would say most practictioners of those styles would not "get" Wing Chun.
Why do you feel they wouldn't "get" WC?
QUOTE
Do you feel Wing Chun is a "minor" art Centurion ? If you do not then it's gonna cause a lot of misunderstanding if you post statements like Smith's. If you do, that is fine too. That is why there are 100's of styles of martial arts.......
To be honest, I don't know how to rate Wing Chun, one way or the other.Being originally from a fencing background myself, I find the concepts of WC very appealing. The efficient use of movement which seems so characteristic of Wing Chun, for example, is something that Western fencers have also cultivated to a great degree.
In addition, Wing Chun was Lee's base style, and, being a fan of Lee and his ideas, I'll admit to being intrigued by Wing Chun because of that. Lee was a smart guy, and he clearly saw merit in the method.
But then, I see things like Steve Falkner's loss to Sambo/Judo man Igor Zinoviev, at Extreme Fighting Battlecade 2. Falkner gave a WC demo before the fight, and his Wing Chun looked pretty sharp. Then, he ended up succumbing to a textbook rear naked choke.
I also recall the time when a young Emin Boztepe jumped William Cheung at the latter's seminar. Here we had two WC exponents trying to prove to each other who had better Wing Chun, and neither one even ended up using Wing Chun! All they did was roll around on the floor, and it was evident that they had little knowledge of effective groundwork.
So again, I'm not so sure how I feel about it. I guess you could say that there hasn't been much in terms of Wing Chun that I've actually seen work.
QUOTE
RE: Bill Paul. An Olympic level judoka will give EVERY stand up style major problems once into clinching range. A Brazilian JJ stylist would submit most Judoka on the ground, A Muay Thai stylist would put most Judoka to sleep at kicking range.....so what ?
So what?
You asked who Bill Paul was, and I told you.
Paul, like Smith, apparently wasn't impressed with Wing Chun. His experience and opinions on the matter are interesting.
As for your disclaimer ("An Olympic level judoka will give EVERY stand up style major problems once into clinching range..."), I have to ask--what, then, is WC's answer to grappling?