QUOTE(BowlingforIllidan @ Nov 19 2005, 08:37 AM) [snapback]4771130[/snapback]
a lot of Japanese woodblock prints from the war depict Chinese soldiers, but I'm not sure how far you can trust them...
for starters, the Japanese look like Europeans, while the Chinese look like goblins...
Click to view attachmentYes, exactly so. That time Qing army was not a real military power. Some reorganized troops trained by German officers proved to be low-moralled in battles.
The most part of Chinese army stuck to their traditional uniform and even to traditional weapon.
In the same time in Pamir Mountain Russian detachement had to clash with Chinese troops in order to protect the state border from the intrusion of Chinese outposts. In a battle where a Chinese soldier was killed in action and 29 were captured, Chinese troops were dressed like in XVIII century and wielded mostly matchlocks and only several men were equipped with American rifles.
In 1860-s Russian traveller Vasily V. Radlov travelled in Sinjiang and said that Chinese border troops were dressed like hangry ghosts in the Hell in ragged and torn cloths and wielded bows.
In the end of XIX century before the Boxer's Rebellion Manchu government tried to organize local Nanai people to serve in the Army along the River of Amur. Russian documents depicted nanai soldiers as tall and strong youngmen in white traditional clothes with old matchlocks which were in the very bad order.
It is not to offence anybody but the Army of the Qing Empire was corrupted and not able to protect the Empire. So after the Sino-Japanese war and after the Bxers Rebellion the traditional military organization was abandoned and the building of the New Army begin.
Frankly speaking in cases when Chinese new army wanted to fight and possesed well-trained personnell and weapon it was really strong enemy. In WWII in Burma Chinese troops re-eqiupped with modern English and American weapon were the best troops of anti-Japanese coalition.
Best regards,
Alexey.