QUOTE
Most Filipinos are not related to the Aetas. The Aetas were some of the first immigrants to the Philippines many thousands of years ago. Most modern Filipinos now are believed to come from an Austronesian group who came later.
True but that wasn't my point. My point is, with how Filipinos were taught by the society to be racist to people who have darker skin, I doubt anyone will be brave enough to proudly say I'm Aeta. Sadly, the Aeta minority suffer from this stigma. How many people who have aeta blood have proudly said that their are Aetas? None that I hard of, even amoth those who are obviously Aetas(by phyisical appearnces). Zambales and Quirino has a healthy number if Aeta but many people there, even though it is obvious with their physical apperace won't even admit that they have Aeta blood. Can't blame them. GENERALLY, Filipinos don't have a good impression on dark skinned people. The Ilocanos themselves are already discriminated as 'baluga', what more with the Aetas?
QUOTE
I made no such mistake. It is obvious to me that Filipinos trace their ancestry to some sort of immigrants, most likely the Austronesian settlers from Southern China or Taiwan. Where else could we have come from? The air?
It's a fact that a higher percentage of Filipinos can speak English than any other Asian country save MAYBE Singapore. The interchange between f's and p's and v with b's is just the accent because our native languages do not contain those sounds. As for the native languages, most Filipinos are fluent in their native language and Tagalog. In fact, this is true more so now than it would have been 30 years ago. What are you going on about?
What am I going about? Many, not all, think too highly of themselves to the point of bringing down other countries. Many Filipinos have the habit of poking at one's accent(The tagalogs are famous for this!) without realizing that they themselves have accents and mispronunciations. In accents alone, a lot of Filipinos already discriminate other people, Filipinos or not yet when people comment on their accent, they take it to the personal level.
And from what I remember in your last post, you were mentioning about Filipino ancestry being from the Malays of Indonesia and Malaysia, not the Austronesians from Taiwan/Southern China.
QUOTE
Do you have a problem reading? When did I ever say that? In fact, if you check my post history, you'll find that I've said quite the opposite! What you're doing is deliberately taking my post out of context. I said you won't find the racism that happens in MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA in the Philippines. How many race riots have happened in the Philippines? There have been several in Indonesia against the Chinese. in the past 50 years. The racism in Malaysia by the muslim Malay majority is MUCH more blatant than in the Philippines especially nowadays.
Riots, maybe none. But remember the interval massacres back then. And no, it wasn't only by the Spaniards. The ideas were participants too. Of course, the Indios would always blame the Spaniards.
Racism/Discrimination does not have to include race riots. A growing practice in the Philippine is the discrimination of the migrating muslims in Luzon and Visayas. Their religion plays a factor here. Even if they have the qualifications, just because they are followers of Islams, they will not be hired at all. Discrimination at its finest. One reason why a lot of migrating muslims usually end up as cellphone traders(second hand) and pirated DVD vendors. They are hardly left with any choice. In addition to that, several Catholic institutions, primarily in Mega Manila do not accept muslim students. That only University I know that accepts people from different religious background is SLU in the north. But most Catholic/Christians schools don't.
In addition to that, the riots in Indonesia and Malaysia is much more economic that actually racial. And just because hardly were there riots in the Philippines does not necessarily mean Filipinos are more tolerant than Indonesians nor Malaysians. None-Chinese love targeting the Chinese for their KFR businesses - a sign of anti-Chinese sentiment. They always kidnap the Chinese but they never kidnap the Ayalas who don't even arm themselves with bodyguards.
Filipinos are more creative that their Malaysian and Indonesian counterparts when it comes to discrimination. In riots, you don't get money; in kidnapping the ethnic Chinese, you get money... Not only do they scare the Chinese, they make money out of them. A more 'brilliant' strategy than Malaysia's affirmative action.
QUOTE
They are Indian and Arab influence only since the early middle ages when Arab and Indian traders came to those countries. They did not start out that way. Most of this influence either never got to the Philippines or was mostly wiped out by the Spaniards. Most Arab influence can still be found on Mindanao.
Because the Spaniards never intended to wipe out native cultures for that matter in addition to the fact that the Spanish culture itself
IS PART Arab. So, in that case, the Arab influence will hard be erased because teh culture that influenced the local cultures most is PART ARAB.
QUOTE
Look at the patterns of Islam in other countries. There have been many times where Islam had faced some sort or opposition opposition by the local rulers but kept on spreading anyway. Muhammad wasn't even initially accepted in his own country at first until he defeated his enemies in battle. There's no reason to think that Islam wouldn't have kept spreading in the Philippines had the Catholic Spaniards not arrived.
Islam will not really be the primary religion in the Philippines. Islam failed to fully Islamized Mindanao within the 200 years, what more with the whole archipelago. Historically, only SW Mindanao was Islam. Only small portion of Maynilad was Islamized. It was never proven that Islam ever unified the Islands nor will it ever be. It failed to actually unify Mindanaoan tribes, what more with the philippines. The Arab language did not unify them. Muslims in Minadanao still identify themselves according to their ethnic group, not religion just as much as most Christian Filipinos do - Cebuano, Tagalog, Ilocano.
My point here is that most pre-Hispanic people most likely did not find Islam that appealing or it's either they were too loyal toward their Animistic culture.
it really pisses me of when people make a big deal about Islam in the philippines to the point that people say that ancient Filipinos were mostly muslims which is just a farce. Islam, even until the 1500's was limited to a few places - even in Mindanao.
The Christians 'unconsciously' know more Arab words than the Muslims in the south. Of course that's via Spanish and 20% of Tagalog vocabulary are of Spanish original(25% in Cebuano).
It's funny how some people 'romanticize' the huanas.