The Sling as a Weapon of War
Posted 21 July 2009 - 05:05 PM
There is an excellent article by Dohrenwend on its role in and impact on ancient warfare. It is interesting to note that slingers outdid archers in terms of effective range. The evidence seems to date back as far as the ancient Near East, when slingers were depicted on Assyrian reliefs behind archers assaulting cities. Roman authors like Vegetius (4th century AD) seem to corrobate this, as do modern investigations and calculations.
Their high impact effect also made them suitable weapons against mailed cavalry, used by the Romans effectively against Parthian cataphracts as early as the 1st century BC. A breakthrough occurred in the 5th century BC when Greek slingers began to use much more effective lead projectiles which also had a longer range.
Dohrenwend, Robert, "The Sling. Forgotten Firepower of Antiquity", Journal of Asian Martial Arts, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2002), pp. 28-49:
More information at: http://www.slinging.org/
Posted 23 July 2009 - 01:50 AM
Posted 01 September 2009 - 01:37 AM
First their origin. they were mainly used to bring down small animals and birds from a distance or in flight, and since their ammo can be found pretty much every were even the poorest goat herder could have one and practice with it.
Their Con's is very well known.
1) They demand even more practice for good use than the Longbow. IE Balearic Slingers which were used by all sides from the Peloponnese's wars (400BCE) to the late republic/Early Imperial area in Rome (80AD) literally grew up with a sling in their hands, children were expected to contribute to the household by hunting birds.
2) Militarized Slinger's used more specialized ammo than just stones, and had two slings a *Heavy* (Short ranged heavy stones/projectiles weighing up to a kg) and a *Light* (Equivalent to what the civilians used), they used heavy stones cut and formed into a oval shape, or under the Romans lead, which were both heavy and easily formed.
This means that their origin by itself makes it very unlikely to emerge outside societies were slings would be used by everyman.
We all should look for the truth, no matter how painful or obnoxious it might be. but we always have to keep in mind that any truth we find will be coloured by both our self as well as those that createt it. an absolute truth is always impossible to reach since we as species by nature is falible. the greatest danger is when we convinces our self that the truth we know is the only truth that counts.
Worth remembering that truth is not the same as law of reality. IE the law of gravity no matter how it is describet is always as law that counts, likewise all other natural laws, it is only our incomplete grasp of them that can make them seem inconsistent or untruthfull.
40K - where the genocidal, xenocidal, fascist, ultraconservative zealots with a morbid fear of technology and an unhealthy fondness for burning things... are the good guys.
Posted 05 September 2009 - 05:35 AM
Xenaphon's statement about range is for lead slingshot vs sort self bows (covered in numerous articles). The Assyrians are spearmen using slings to assist in seiges.
Posted 10 September 2009 - 09:35 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users